바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.28 No.4

Citation Share

오픈액세스출판에 대한 학술지 편집인의 인식 연구

Editor's Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Open Access Publishing

정보관리학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2011, v.28 no.4, pp.183-200
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.183
정경희 (한성대학교)
정경희. (2011). 오픈액세스출판에 대한 학술지 편집인의 인식 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(4), 183-200, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.183

초록

본 연구는 국내 학술지 중 상용DB를 통하여 원문서비스를 제공하지 않고 무료로 원문을 공개하는 309종의 학술지들이 어떤 이유로 무료서비스를 선택하였는지를 파악하기 위하여 학술지 편집인들을 대상으로 조사하였다. 또한 이들 무료 오픈액세스 학술지 편집인의 오픈액세스에 대한 인식과 지지도 및 지지이유에 대해서도 파악해보고자 하였다. 연구결과 오픈액세스를 선택한 이유는 학술논문의 무료이용 확대와 인용 확대의지, 해당 학문분야의 국제적 분위기 때문인 것으로 나타났다. 학술지 편집인들은 오픈액세스에 대하여 알고 있는 경우가 약 65%, 지지하는 응답자가 약 75%였다. 지지 이유로는 학술연구성과 공유, 동료연구자의 이용가능성 확대, 학술지 인지도 향상 등을 제시하였다.

keywords
gratis open access journal, editors perceptions, attitudes, field differences, approval rating, gratis open access journal, editors perceptions, attitudes, field differences, approval rating, 무료 오픈액세스 학술지, 편집인 인식, 태도, 분야별 차이, 지지도

Abstract

This study surveyed editors of 309 gratis open access journals in Korea in order to examine the reason why they decided to open their journals to the public on the Web. Also this study examined their perceptions and attitudes toward open access publishing. The main reasons of open access publishing in Korea were expansion of free use, increasing citation, and international trends regarding open access in their scholarly fields. Also, 65% of all respondents were aware of the concepts of open access, and 75% supported open access. The reasons of supporting open access were sharing of research results with the public, increasing the availability of peer researchers, and enhancing journal reputations.

keywords
gratis open access journal, editors perceptions, attitudes, field differences, approval rating, gratis open access journal, editors perceptions, attitudes, field differences, approval rating, 무료 오픈액세스 학술지, 편집인 인식, 태도, 분야별 차이, 지지도

참고문헌

1.

조종민. (2007). 오픈액세스 학술 커뮤니케이션에 대한 연구자의 태도에 관한 연구.

2.

Austin, Anthony. (2008). Academic Authorship, Publishing Agreements and Open Access: Survey Results. Queensland University of Technology. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/13623/1/13623_3.pdf.

3.

Berchum, Marnix van. (2011). Results of the SOAP Survey: A First Overview of the Dutch Situation. http://www.openaccess.nl/images/pdf/soap_nl.pdf.

4.

Brown, Sheridan. (2007). Researchers' Use of Academic Libraries and their Services: A Report Commissioned by the Research Information Network and the Consortium of Research Libraries. Key Perspectives Ltd. http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/13868/.

5.

Creaser, Claire. (2010). Authors' Awareness and Attitudes Toward Open Access Repositories. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(Supplement 1), 145-161.

6.

Dallmeier-Tiessen, Suenje. (2011). from the SOAP Project Survey. What Scientists Think about Open Access Publishing. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1101/1101.5260.pdf.

7.

Hess, Thomas. (2007). pen Access & Science Publishing: Results of a Survey on Researchers' Acceptance and Use of Open Access Publishing. Ludwig-Maximilians- Universitat Munich. http://openaccess-study.com/Hess_Wigand_Mann_Walter_2007_Open_Access_Management_Report.pdf.

8.

Kennan, Mary Anne. (2007). Academic Authors, Scholarly Publishing, and Open Access in Australia. Learned Publishing, 20(2), 138-146.

9.

Kennan, Mary Anne. (2007). Scholarly publishing and open access: Searching for understanding of an emerging is phenomenon. ECIS 2007 - The 15th European Conference on Information Systems, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland, 7-9 June 2007. http://eprints.rclis..org/bitstream/10760/11652/1/ECIS2007.schol.pub.reviewed.pdf.

10.

Key Perspectives Ltd. (2004). JISC/OSI Journal Authors Survey Report. Truro. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/JISCOAreport1.pdf.

11.

Kling, R. (1999). Scholarly Communication and the Continuum of Electronic Publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 890-906.

12.

Morris, Sally. (2009). Learned Society Members and Open Access. Learned Publishing, 22(3), 221-239.

13.

Morrison, Heather. (2009). Scholarly Communication for Librarians:Chandos Publishing.

14.

(2007). Exploring the willingness of scholars to accept open access: A grounded theory approach. JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, 38(2), 55-84.

15.

Park, Ji-Hong. (2007). Factors Influencing the Adoption of Open Access Publishing.

16.

Rowlands, Ian. (2005). New Journal Publishing Models: An International Survey of Senior Researchers. A CIBER report for the Publishers Association and the International Association of STM Publishers. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ciber/ciber_2005_survey_final.pdf.

17.

Rowlands, Ian. (2004). Scholarly Communication in the Digital Environment: What Do Authors Want? London: Ciber. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ciber/ciber-pa-report.pdf.

18.

Schroter, Sare. (2005). Perceptions of Open Access Publishing: Interviews with Journal Authors. British Medical Journal, 330, 756-759.

19.

Swan, Alma. (2004). Authors and Open Access Publishing. Learned Publishing, 17, 219-224.

20.

Swan, Alma. (2005). Open Access Self-archiving: an Author Study. Key Perspectives Limited. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.112.5048&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

21.

Warlick, Stefanie E. (2007). Factors Influencing Publication Choice: Why Faculty Choose Open Access. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 2007(4), -.

22.

Xia, Jingfeng. (2010). Longitudinal Study of Scholars Attitudes and Behaviors Toward Open-Access Journal Publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 615-624.

정보관리학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책