바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.34 No.3
Citation Share

An Analysis of the Digital Library Research Trends in Korea

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2017, v.34 no.3, pp.49-66
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.3.049


& (2017). An Analysis of the Digital Library Research Trends in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(3), 49-66, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.3.049
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the research trends on the digital libraries in Korea. To achieve this objective, a total of 578 author-assigned English keywords were collected from the 272 major LIS journal articles published in Korea during last ten years-period, i.e., 2007-2016. The collected data were analyzed using NetMiner V.4 to discover their ‘degree centrality’ and ‘betweenness centrality’. As the results, ‘Academic Library’, ‘Reference Service’, ‘Public Library’, ‘E Resource’, and ‘E Book’ showed the most frequently conducted research topics, and ‘Academic Library’, ‘Reference Service’, ‘Information Behavior’, and ‘E Resource’ were the most influencing research topics. Finally, ‘Academic Library’, ‘Metadata’, ‘Information Behavior’, ‘E Resource’, and ‘Librarian’ seemed the most widely intervening research topics in this research.

keywords
디지털 도서관, 연구 동향, 네트워크 분석, 연결중심성, 매개중심성, digital libraries, research trends, network analysis, degree centrality, betweenness centrality

Reference

1.

곽기영. (2017). 소셜네트워크분석:청람.

2.

김정환. (2011). 디지털 환경에서 학술연구자들의 정보요구 및 이용행태에 관한 연구 - 인문사회분야와 과학기술분야의 비교를 중심으로 -. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 42(3), 189-208.

3.

서은경. (2013). Detecting Research Trends in Korean Information Science Research, 2000-2011. 정보관리학회지, 30(4), 215-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.215.

4.

이기헌. (2015). 문헌정보학 분야 핵심 학술지들의 가중 주제 - 방법 네트워크 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 49(3), 457-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.3.457.

5.

이성신. (2016). 키워드 네트워크 분석을 통한 도서관마케팅 연구 경향 분석 - 우리나라와 국외연구의 비교분석 -. 한국문헌정보학회지, 50(3), 383-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.3.383.

6.

이수상. (2012). 네트워크 분석 방법론:논형.

7.

이재윤. (2006). 계량서지적 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 척도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(3), 191-214.

8.

임종균. (1994). 가상 사전 편찬 작업을 통한 멀티미디어 디지털도서관 구현 (651-659). 1994년 대한산업공학회 추계학술대회 논문집.

9.

장령령. (2014). 학술지 중요도와 키워드 순서를 고려한 단어동시출현 분석을 이용한 독서분야의 지적구조 분석. 한국비블리아학회지, 25(1), 295-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.1.295.

10.

장윤금. (2014). 국립디지털도서관 정보광장 이용자의 만족도 및 이용행태에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 48(2), 201-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.2.201.

11.

정우성. (2013). 과학계량학 연구동향 및 과학기술정책 분야 응용가능성. 한국과학기술기획평가원.

12.

정재영. (2012). 대학도서관 공간활용 방안 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 43(3), 333-352.

13.

정재영. (2011). 한국 문헌정보학의 현장연구 현황 분석. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 42(2), 171-191.

14.

조재인. (2011). 네트워크 텍스트 분석을 통한 문헌정보학 최근 연구 경향 분석. 정보관리학회지, 28(4), 65-83.

15.

Muhammad Arif. (2012). The changing role of librarians in the digital world: Adoption of Web 2.0 technologies by Pakistani librarians. The Electronic Library, 30(4), 469-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02640471211252184.

16.

Borgman, C. L.. (1999). What are digital libraries? Competing visions. Information Processing and Management, 35(3), 227-243.

17.

Borgman, C. L.. (2000). From Gutenberg to the global information infrastructure: Access to information in the networked world:MIT Press.

18.

G.G. Chowdhury. (1999). Digital library research: major issues and trends. Journal of Documentation, 55(4), 409-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000007154.

19.

Chowdhury, G.. (2003). Introduction to digital libraries:Facet Publishing.

20.

Digital Library Federation. (2016). 2016 Digital Library Federation forum. https://osf.io/view/dlf2016/.

21.

Frosio, G.. (2011). Google books rejected: Taking the orphans to the digital public library of Alexandria. Santa Clara Computer and High - Technology Law Journal, 28(1), 81-141.

22.

Stuart Hamilton. (2003). Freedom of access to information and freedom of expression: the Internet as a tool for global social inclusion. Library Management, 24(8/9), 407-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01435120310501086.

23.

Jae Yun Lee. (2010). Domain analysis with text mining: Analysis of digital library research trends using profiling methods. Journal of Information Science, 36(2), 144-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551509353251.

24.

Gao-Yong Liu. (2012). A co-word analysis of digital library field in China. Scientometrics, 91(1), 203-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0586-4.

25.

Ali Shiri. (2003). Digital library research: current developments and trends. Library Review, 52(5), 198-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530310476689.

26.

Paul Sturges. (2001). The Library and Freedom of Information: Agent or Icon?. Alexandria: The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues, 13(1), 3-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095574900101300102.

27.

Theng, Y.. (2009). Handbook of research on digital libraries: Design, development, and impact:IGI Global.

28.

Lu Xiao. (2016). Exploring the topic hierarchy of digital library research in China using keyword networks: a K-core decomposition approach. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1085-1101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2051-x.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy