바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

영상치의학에서 초음파영상의 진단과 유용성

Application and usefulness of Ultrasound sonography in dentistry

Abstract

Ultrasound sonography(US) is used to evaluate various diseases of oral and maxillofacial region including salivary glands, soft tissue and jaw lesions because of easy accessibility and no hazard of ionizing radiation. Also, US can offer dynamic study showing real-time images during diagnostic or surgical procedure. US images provide accurate information about the internal features of lesions on the jaw prior to surgical treatment. Doppler images are used to visualize the vascular distribution of the lesions and to provide additional information to enhance diagnostic value. It is necessary to evaluate the diagnostic value of US and evaluate its usefulness by looking at clinical cases using US images. Therefore, US imaging may be recommended as an assistant image in evaluating jaw lesions. US images provided accurate information about the internal structure of lesions on the jaw prior to surgical treatment, and diagnostic value was enhanced by visualizing the vascular distribution of the lesion using doppler imaging. We report the protocol and suggest the effectiveness of US for various lesions and US-guided sialography.

keywords
ultrasound, sonography, diagnosis, jaws, salivary gland

참고문헌

1.

1. Vivekanandh RG, Rajshekar P, Ramlal G, Jithender R. Ultrasonographic (USG) imaging in orofacial diseases-A review. Ann Essence Dent 2011;3:100-4.

2.

2. Gritzmann N, Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Hubner E Sonography of the salivary glands. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13 : 964-75.

3.

3. Martinoli C, Derchi LE, Solbiati L, Rizzatto G, Silvestri E, Giannoni M Color Doppler sonography of salivary glands. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994; 163: 933-41.

4.

4. Satiroglu F, Arun T, Isik F. Comparative data on facial morphology and muscle thickness using ultrasonography. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27 : 562-7.

5.

5. Ariji Y, Kimura Y, Gotoh M, Sakuma S, Zhao YP, Ariji E.Blood flow in and around the masseter muscle: normal and pathologic features demonstrated by color Doppler sonography.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 91 : 472-82.

6.

6. Gold L, Nazarian LN, Johar AS, Rao VM.Characterization of maxillofacial soft tissue vascular anomalies by ultrasound and color Doppler imaging: an adjuvant to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61 : 19-31.

7.

7. Lauria DL, Marcos M. US evaluation of bony lesions of the jaw. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 ; 82:351-7.

8.

8. Yasumoto M, Nakagawa T. Ultrasonography of the sublingual space. J Ultrasound Med 1993 ;12:723-9.

9.

9. Tovi F, Barki Y, Hertzanu Y Ultrasound detection of anaerobic neck infection. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993 ; 102:157-8.

10.

10. Arijii E, Arijii Y. Ultrasonographic evaluation of inflammatory changes in masseter muscle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994 ; 78:797-801.

11.

11. Toranzo JM, Martinez JMM US guided percut aneous drainage of cervicofacial infections. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999 ; 28:256-8.

12.

12. Cotti E, Campisi G, Ambu R, Dettori C. Ultrasound real-time imaging in the differential diagnosis of periapical lesions. Int Endod J. 2003 ; 36:556-63.

13.

13. Cotti E, Campisi G, Garau V, Puddu G. A new technique for the study of periapical bone lesions:ultrasound real time imaging. Int Endod J. 2002;35:148-52.

14.

14. Gundappa M, Ng SY, Whaites EJ. Comparison of ultrasound, digital and conventional radiography in differentiating periapical lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 ; 35:326-33.

15.

15. Sumer AP, Danaci M, Ozen Sandikci E, Sumer M, Celenk P. Ultrasonography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of intraosseous lesions of the jaws. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38:23-7.

16.

16. Bertram S, Emshoff R. Sonography of periimplant buccal bone defects in periodontitis patients: A pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 ;105:99-103.

17.

17. Mukai-Higashihori K, Baba Y, Tetsumura A, Tsuji M, Ishizaki T, Higashihori N, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T, Suzuki S, Ohyama K. Ultrasonographic assessment of new bone formation in maxillary distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 ;66:1750-3.

18.

18. Bruno C, Minniti S, Buttura-da-Prato E, Albanese M, Nocini PF, Pozzi-Mucelli R. Gray-scale ultrasonography in the evaluation of bone callus in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: initial findings. Eur Radiol. 2008 ;18:1012-7.

19.

19. Poul JHK, Brown JE , Davies J. Retrospective study of the effectiveness of high-resolution ultrasound compared with sialography in the diagnosis of Sjogren’s syndrome. Dentomaxillofac Radiology 2008 ;37:392-7.

20.

20. Urban W. Geisthoff, Maune S. Ultrasound-guided mechanical fragmentation of sialoliths (sonoguided forceps). Head Neck 2010 ;32:1641-7.

21.

21. Drage NA, McAuliffe NJ. Ultrasound-guided basket retrieval of salivary stones: a new technique. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 ;43:246-8.

22.

22. Bozzato A, Hertel V, Bumm K, Iro H, Zenk J. Salivary stimulation with ascorbic acid enhances sonographic diagnosis of obstructive sialadenitis. J Clin Utrasound 2009 ;37:329-32.

23.

23. Berridge and Winter. Saline Infusion Sonohysterography Technique, Indications, and Imaging Findings. (J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23:97-112.

24.

24. Venkataraman SS, Aravind RJ, Kavin T. The role of diagnostic ultrasound as a new diagnostic aid in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2012 ;4:S121-4.

logo