open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 0376-4672
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the dental radiography status and radiation risk of children and adolescents for 5 years in Yonsei University Dental Hospital. Materials and Methods: The dental radiography database of individuals under the age of 18 years was provided by the electronic medical records (EMR) from Yonsei University Dental Hospital from 2015 to 2019. The type of dental radiography included pan oramic radiography, periapical radiography, bitewing radiography, cephalometric radiography, cone-beam computed tomography and computed tomography. The number of dental radiographies and the effective dose per person was investigated. Results: For 5 years, panoramic and periapical radiography were taken the most. Panoramic radiography, periapical radiography, bitewing radiography, cephalometric radiography, cone-beam computed tomography and computed tomography were taken the most at the age of 5 – 7 years, 4 years, 18 years, 18 years, 18, 7 years and 10, 11 years respectively. As analyzed by department, the radiographs were taken the most in order of pediatric dentistry, orthodontic, conservative dentistry. The annual average of effective dose per person increased with age, and it was highest at the age of 18 years. But it was lower than 1.0 mSv, the annual standard of defense in the general public. The effective dose of over 80% of patients are under 0.1 mSv. But there were 2 patients whose effective dose was over 1.0 mSv. The annual average effective dose per person by dental radiography type was highest at the age of 0 – 3 years for periapical radiography and at the age of over 4 years for panoramic radiography. Conclusion: This investigation into the status of number of dental radiography and effective dose for individuals of children and adolescents will contribute to maximizing the benefits of dental radiography and minimizing the radiation dose.
1. Madan K, Baliga S, Thosar N, Rathi N. Recent advances in dental radiography for pediatric patients: A review. J med radiol pathol surg 2015;1(2):21-25. https://doi:10.15713/ins.jmrps.11.
2. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Achievements of the Past 50 Years and Addressing the Needs of the Future [Internet]. 2014. [cited 2022 August 10]. Available from:https://ncrponline.org/publications/annual-meeting-proceedings-and-presentations/.
3. Cousins C, Miller D, Bernardi G, Rehani M, Schofield P, VañóE, et al. International commission on radiological protection. Ann ICRP 2011; 120: 1-125.
4. Khong P, Ringertz H, Donoghue V, Frush D, Rehani M, Appelgate K, et al. ICRP publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology. Ann ICRP 2013;42(2): 1-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2012.10.001.
5. Enforcement Decree of the Nuclear Safety Act. Dose Limit [Internet]. [cited 2022 August 10]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=228965#0000.
6. Preston D, Ron E, Tokuoka S, Funamoto S, Nishi N, Soda M, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat Res 2007; 168(1): 1-64. https://doi.org/10.1667/RR0763.1.
7. Claus EB, Calvocoressi L, Bondy ML, Schildkraut JM, Wiemels JL, Wrensch M. Dental x-rays and risk of meningioma. Cancer 2012; 118(18): 4530-4537. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26625.
8. Memon A, Godward S, Williams D, Siddique I, Al-Saleh K. Dental x-rays and the risk of thyroid cancer: a case-control study. Acta Oncol 2010; 49(4): 447-453. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841861003705778.
9. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Assessment of radiation exposure of korean population by medical radiation [Internet]. [cited 2022 August 10]. Available from:https://kdca.go.kr/filepath/boardDownload.es?bid=0003&list_no=712580&seq=1.
10. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Guideline for diagnostic reference level(dental radiography) [Internet]. [cited 2022 August 10]. Available from: https://www.kdca.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20305050000&bid=0003&act=view&list_no=364869.
11. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. CT radiation exposure dose evaluation program(ALARA-CT) [internet]. [cited 2022 August 10]. Available from: https://www.kdca.go.kr/board/board.es?mid=a20305050000&bid=0003.
12. Kühnisch J, Anttonen V, Duggal M, Spyridonos ML, Rajasekharan S, Sobczak M, et al. Best clinical practice guidance for prescribing dental radiographs in children and adolescents:an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2020; 21(4):375-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00493-x.
13. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Statistics of frequent disease [Internet]. [cited 2022 August 10]. Available from: http://opendata.hira.or.kr/op/opc/olapHifrqSickInfo.do.
14. 대한소아치과학회. 소아청소년치과학. 제5판. 서울: 덴탈위스덤;2014. p. 281, 289, 566, 567.
15. Taylor GK, Macpherson LMD. An investigation into the use of bitewing radiography in children in Greater Glasgow. British dental journal 2004; 196(9): 563-568. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811228.
16. Go GJ. Precautions for radiography and photography of children. J Kor Dent Assoc 1991; 29(12): 921-924.
17. 전국 치과교정학 교수협의회. 치과교정학. 제3판. 서울: 지성출판사;2014. p. 237.
18. Huddleston Slater JJ, Lobbezoo F, Onland-Moret NC, Naeije M. Anterior disc displacement with reduction and symptomatic hypermobility in the human temporomandibular joint: prevalence rates and risk factors in children and teenagers. J Orofac Pain 2007; 21(1): 55-6.
19. Nilsson IM, List T, Drangsholt M. Incidence and temporal patterns of temporomandibular disorder pain among Swedish adolescents. J Orofac Pain 2007; 21(2): 127-3.
20. Miracle AC, Mukherji SK : Cone-beam CT of the head and neck, part 2 : clinical applications. Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30:1285-1292. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1654.
21. Silveira LFM, Silveira CF, Martos J, Piovesan EM, Neto JBC. Clinical technique for invasive cervical root resorption. J Conserv Dent 2011; 14: 440-444. . https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.87225.
22. Song JS, Lee JH, Choi HJ, Son HK, Kim SO. Consideration of anesthetic method of deep impacted mesiodens. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2012; 39: 1. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2012.39.1.90.
23. Jung YH, Cho BH. Radiographic evaluation of third molar development in 6-to 24-year-olds. Imaging Sci Dent 2014; 44(3):185-191. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2014.44.3.185.
24. Fontana M, Yepes JF, Eckert GJ, Hale KJ, Benavides E. Patterns of radiograph use in a population of commercially insured children. J Am Dent Assoc 2022; 153(5): 405-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2021.09.014.
25. Menaker NH, Yepes JF, Vinson LA, Jones JE, Downey T, Tang Q, et al. Prescription of bitewing and panoramic radiographs in pediatric dental patients: An assessment of current trends and provider compliance. J Am Dent Assoc 2022; 153(1): 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2021.07.001.
26. Muzzin KB, Flint DJ, Schneiderman E. Dental radiography prescribing practices: a nationwide survey of dental hygienists. Gen Dent 2019; 67(2): 38-53.
27. Shin HS, Nam KC, Park H, Choi HU, Kim HY, Park CS. Effective doses from panoramic radiography and CBCT(cone beam CT) using dose area product (DAP)95 in dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43(5): 20130439. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20130439.