바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

(사)한국터널지하공간학회

Flow and smoke behavior of a longitudinal ventilation tunnel with various velocities using computational fluid dynamics

(사)한국터널지하공간학회 / (사)한국터널지하공간학회, (P)2233-8292; (E)2287-4747
2014, v.16 no.1, pp.103-113



Abstract

A numerical analysis on the smoke behavior and evacuee safety has been performed with computational fluid dynamics. The purpose of this study is to build computational processes for an evacuation and prevention of a fire disaster of the 3km-length tunnel in Korea. To save computational cost, 1.5km of the tunnel that can include a few cross-passing tunnels is considered. We are going to assess the fire safety in a road tunnel according to the smoke level, which consists of the smoke density and the height from the floor. The smoke density is obtained in detail from three-dimensional unsteady CFD analysis. To obtain proper temperature distributions on the tunnel wall, one-dimensional conduction equation is considered instead of an adiabatic wall boundary or a constant heat flux. The tunnel considered in this study equips the cross passing tunnels for evacuees every 250 m. The distance is critical in both safety and economy. The more cross passing tunnels, the more safe but the more expensive. Three different jet fan operations can be considered in this study; under- and over-critical velocities for normal traffic condition and 0-velocoty operation for the traffic congestion. The SE (smoke environment) level maps show a smoke environment and an evacuating behavior every moment.

keywords
임계풍속, 대피터널, 대피자, 수치해석, 제트팬, Critical wind velocity, Cross passing tunnel, Evacuee, Numerical method, Jet fan

Reference

1.

1. Kunikane, Y., Kawabata, N., Ishikawa, T., TAkekuni, K., Shimoda, A. (2002), Thermal Fummes and Smoke Induced by Bus Fire Accident in Large Cross Sectional Tunnel, The fifth JSME-KSME Fluids Engineering Conference, Nov. 17-21, 2002, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 1-6.

2.

2. Kunikane, Y., Kawabata, N., Takekunni, K., Shimoda, A. (2003), Heat Release Rate Induced by Gasoline Pool Fire in a Large-Cross-Section Tunnel, Tunnel Management International, Vol. 6(1), pp. 22-29.

3.

3. Hwang, C.C., Edwards, J.C. (2005), The Critical Ventilation Velocity in Tunnel Fires – a Computer Simulation, Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 40, pp. 213-244.

4.

4. Launder, B.E., Spalding, D.B. (1974), The numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 3, pp. 269-289.

5.

5. STAR-CCM+, (2008), User Guide, Computational Dynamics, Co., London. U. K.

6.

6. Se, C.M.K., Lee, E.W.M., Lai, A. C.K. (2012)“Impact of location of jet fan on airflow structure in tunnel fire,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 27, pp. 30-40.

7.

7. Seike, M, Kawabata, N, Hasegawa, M. (2011), Study about Assessment of Fire Safety in a Road Tunnel by Evacuee’s Behavior Based on Smoke Behavior by 3-D CFD Analysis, Advanced Research Workshop: Evacuation and Human Behavior in Emergency Situations, pp. 111-124.

8.

8. Wang, F., Wang, M., He, S., Zhang J., Deng, Y. (2010) “Computational study of effects of jet fans on the ventilation of a highway curved tunnel,”Tunnelling and underground space technology Vol. 25, pp. 382-390.

(사)한국터널지하공간학회