바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 2233-8292

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.21 No.1
Citation Share

기본 계획 단계에서의 공동구 수용시설물결정 기법

Decision technique for accommodation facilities of multi-utility tunnel in basic planning phase

(사)한국터널지하공간학회 / (사)한국터널지하공간학회, (P)2233-8292; (E)2287-4747
2019, v.21 no.1, pp.79-92
https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2019.21.1.079
오원준 (한국토지주택공사 토지주택연구원 건설기술연구실 연구원)
진규남 (한국토지공사)
강영구 (한국시설안전공단)
조중연 ((주)유니콘스)
심영종 (한국토지주택공사 토지주택연구원)
오원준, 진규남, 강영구, 조중연, & 심영종. (2019). 기본 계획 단계에서의 공동구 수용시설물결정 기법. (사)한국터널지하공간학회, 21(1), 79-92, https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2019.21.1.079
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

본 논문에서는 공동구 도입과 관련하여 초기 기본 계획 단계에서 보다 효율적으로 수용시설물의 설치여부를 결정하기위한 기법을 제시하였다. 이를 위해 수용시설물의 구성과 종수를 결정하기 위한 평가체계를 정립하였다. 7개의 수용시설물에 대하여 98개의 조합을 분석하였으며, 수용시설물 평가체계를 위하여 타당성 및 경제성과 관련된 지표 중 기본 계획단계와 관련된 지표를 선별하였다. 선별된 항목을 반영하여 공간적, 효과적, 비용적 평가로 분류된 평가체계를 제시하였으며, 가중치 설정을 위한 AHP분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 공동구 설치를 위한 기본 계획 단계에서 설계자를 포함한 사용자들이 공동구내 수용시설물을 결정하는 과정에서 시간을 단축하고 효율성을 높이는데 도움이 될 것으로판단된다.

keywords
Multi-utility tunnel, Accommodation facility, Feasibility assessment, Economic evaluation, Evaluation system, 공동구, 수용시설물, 타당성 평가, 경제성 평가, 평가체계

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a method to determine whether to install the accommodation facility of the multi-utility tunnel more effectively in the basic planning phase, and to set up an evaluation system to determine the configuration and kind of accommodation facility. For the configuration of the accommodation facility, 98 alternatives were analyzed for 7 accommodation facility. For the evaluation system of the accommodation facility, index related to feasibility and economic in basic planning phase were selected. The evaluation system classified as spatial, effective, and cost evaluation was presented reflecting the selected index, and AHP analysis was performed for weight setting. The results of this study will be helpful for users including designers to shorten the time and increase the efficiency in the process of determining accommodation facility of the multi-utility tunnel in basic planning phase

keywords
Multi-utility tunnel, Accommodation facility, Feasibility assessment, Economic evaluation, Evaluation system, 공동구, 수용시설물, 타당성 평가, 경제성 평가, 평가체계

참고문헌

1.

1. Cho, C.Y., Sim, Y.J., Kim, H.K., Lee, P.Y., Lee, M.J. (2018), “Analysis of importance by category for quantitative economic evaluation of multi-utility tunnel”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 119-130.

2.

2. Chung, J.S., Na, G.T. (2018), “A study on the feasibility assessment model of urban utility tunnel by analytic hierarchy process”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 131-144.

3.

3. Kang, Y.K., Choi, I.C. (2015), “Economic feasibility of common utility tunnel based on cost-benefit analysis”, Journal of Korean Society of Safety, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 29-36.

4.

4. Lee, S.W., Sim, Y.J., Na, G.T. (2017), “A fundamental study on the development of feasibility assessment system for utility tunnel by urban patterns”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 11-27.

5.

5. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2014), A report of the feasibility and basic planning establishment for urban utility tunnel in Seoul, Seoul Metropolitan Government, pp. 1-10.

6.

6. Sim, Y.J., Jin, K.N., Oh, W.J., Cho, C.Y. (2017), “Development of evaluation model for optimum design of multi-utility tunnel in urban area”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 437-447.

7.

7. Sim, Y.J., Jin, K.N., Oh, W.J., Cho, C.Y. (2018), “Optimal alternative decision technique of accommodation facility in multi-utility tunnel using VE/LCC analysis”, Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 317-329.

(사)한국터널지하공간학회

논문 투고 OA 정책