바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343
  • A&HCI, SCOPUS, KCI

Forced Migration of Koreans to Sakhalin and Their Repatriation

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2004, v.44 no.4, pp.111-132

Abstract

Imperial Japan mobilized Korean people as soldiers, workers, and comfort women after the start of the Sino-Japanese War of 1937. Approximately 150,000 Koreans were forcibly conscripted to work as coal miners in Sakhalin from the second half of the 1930s until liberation in 1945, after which 43,000 remained, detained in Sakhalin because of the Japanese government's irresponsible actions, combined with the Soviet interest in securing a cheap labor force. Only a small number who were married to Japanese women were able to return in the 1950s.The civilian-led repatriation movement that began in the late 1950s did not bear fruit, due to the indifference of Japan and the Soviet Union. In the 1970s, the Japanese government began to show interest in the issue of the Sakhalin Koreans on a humanitarian level, but avoided taking any responsibility. The South Korean government could not afford to pay attention to the issue for economic reasons, while the North Korean government approached it from the standpoint of maintaining their regime. The Soviet government assumed a passive, lukewarm attitude toward the matter only after post-war reconstruction had reached a certain level. In this sense, the problem of the Sakhalin Koreans can be best explainedbest-explained best explained vis--vis the dynamic relations among South and North Korea, the Soviet Union, and Japan during the Cold War. The repatriation movement was transformed from a civilian-led to a government-led one during the second half of the 1980s. Japanese politicians and the Soviet perestroika policy provided the necessary momentum required to resolve the problem. After the first group of repatriates finally set foot in their homeland around 1990, the stream of returnees never stopped.

keywords
forced mobilization, repatriation movement, Koreans in Sakhalin, Korean migration of Sakhalin, forced mobilization, repatriation movement, Koreans in Sakhalin, Korean migration of Sakhalin

Reference

1.

(1994) 論語, 孟子, 中庸, 漢文大系本, 新文豊出版有限公司

2.

(1994) 近思錄, 漢文大系本, 新文豊出版有限公司

3.

(1994) 傳習錄, 漢文大系本, 新文豊出版有限公司

4.

(1988) 霞谷集, 國立中央圖書館

5.

宋熹準, (1998) 心經集義(心經註解叢編 4卷) ,

6.

文淵閣四庫全書本, 篁墩文集,

7.

(1987) 增補退溪全書, 成均館大學校 大東文化硏究院

8.

朴連洙, (1999) 양명학의 이해(朝鮮朝 陽明學의 泰斗 鄭齊斗) , 集文堂

9.

金敎斌, (1995) 양명학자 정제두의 철학사상:존재론․인성론․사회인식에 대한 구조적 이해, 한길사

10.

최재목, (1996) 동아시아의 양명학, 예문서원

11.

김연재, (2006) 「心經集義」에 나타난 鄭齊斗 心學의 성격 및 그 특징, 양명학

12.

최재목, (2005) 동아시아에서 하곡 정제두의 양명학이 갖는 의미, 양명학

13.

송석준, (2001) 한국 양명학의 형성과 하곡 정제두 , 양명학

14.

윤사순, (1992) 정제두 양명학의 연구 , 한국학연구

15.

이해영, (1985) 하곡 정제두 철학의 양명학적 전개, 동양철학연구

16.

김교빈, (1993) 하곡 이기론의 구조에 관한 연구, 유교사상연구

17.

이종태, (1995) 하곡의 사단칠정에 대한 논구-맹자설을 중심으로, 공사논문집

18.

정재훈, (1993) 하곡정제두의 양명학 수용과 경세사상, 한국사론

19.

이해영, (1993) 하곡 정제두의 중용 이해, 퇴계학

20.

정두영, (1998) 18세기 군민일체사상의 구조와 성격, 조선시대사학보

21.

琴章泰, (1998) 하곡 정제두의 心學과 經學, 종교학연구

22.

이봉규, (1996) 송시열 성리학설 연구,

23.

이상호, (2007) 양명학파 및 실학파-心經集義(조선시대 심경부주 주석서 해제) , 예문서원

Korea Journal