바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

Korea Journal

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343
  • A&HCI, SCOPUS, KCI

ISSN : 0023-3900

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.44 No.4

Citation Share

The ＂Equalization＂ Policy: Going beyond Arguments over a False Issue

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2004, v.44 no.4, pp.246-264
김기수 (강원대)
김기수. (2004). . Korea Journal, 44(4), 246-264.

Abstract

This essay reviews the six essays published in the Korea Journal under the general heading, Debate on the Equalization Policy. It points out that the essays have failed to produce a meaningful policy debate due to confusion about the nature of pyeongjunhwa policy, which they deal with as an equalization policy. It argues that the policy was and is not directly serving the development of a solid system of public education. Born out of improvised, inappropriate efforts to cope with the question of entrance competitions, the policy actually helped aggravate the question, deepened state interventionespecially in the private sphere of educationand drained much needed resources for the development of public education.The essay concludes by suggesting a new perspective that is broad enough to accommodate not only the efficacy of the policy concerned but also the statethe owner of the policy which in itself has been an important part of South Koreas structural educational problems.

keywords
education policy, political economy of education, statism in education, private education, public education, pyeongjunhwaThe six Debate on [the] Equalization Policy essays (Chun 2003, Kim Kyung-keun. 2003, Lee 2004, Ahn and Rieu 2004, Kim S. 2004, S, education policy, political economy of education, statism in education, private education, public education, pyeongjunhwaThe six Debate on [the] Equalization Policy essays (Chun 2003, Kim Kyung-keun. 2003, Lee 2004, Ahn and Rieu 2004, Kim S. 2004, S

참고문헌

1.

Ahn, Hyun-Hyo, (2004) Why Do Economists Disagree with the High School Equalization Policy, Korea Journal

2.

Chun, Sangchin, (2003) Modernization and Globalization of Educational Competition: Overcoming the High School Equalization Policy, Korea Journal

3.

Presidential Transition Committee, Republic of Korea, (2003) Gyoyuk gaehyeok-gwa jisik munhwa gangguk silhyeon=Educational Reform and the Realization of a Country of Great Culture and Knowledge(A policy paper),

4.

Kim, Ki Su, A Statist Political Economy and High Demand for Education In South Korea, Educational Policy Analysis Archives

5.

전상진, (2003) Modernization and Globalization of Educational Competition: Overcoming the High School Equalization Policy, Korea Journal

6.

김상봉, (2004) Philosophical Reflections on the School Equalization Policy, Korea Journal

7.

Ko, Hyeong-yeol, (1998) 2000 nyeon ihu-ui ipsi jedo-e kwanhan yeongu=A Study of the University Entrance Examination System after 2000 , Working paper

8.

이주호, (2004) The School Equalization Policy of Korea:Past Failures and Proposed Measure for Reform, Korea Journal

9.

Lee, Ju Ho (Yi, Ju-ho), (2002) Haggyo kaehyǒg-ŭi chǒnryag(In Jayul-gwa chaengmu-ui hakgyo gaehyeok: pyeongjunhwa nonui-reul neomeoseo=Reforming Schools in Korea: Beyond the “Equalization Policy” Debate),Collection of working papers, Seoul: Korea Development Institute.

10.

신중섭, (2004) Equalization and Educational Totalitarianism, Korea Journal

Korea Journal

논문 투고 OA 정책