바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

Korea Journal

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343
  • A&HCI, SCOPUS, KCI

ISSN : 0023-3900

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.49 No.2

Citation Share

“Questions to the Creator” in Korean Intellectual History

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2009, v.49 no.2, pp.119-136
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2009.49.2.119
김영민 (서울대학교)
김영민. (2009). . Korea Journal, 49(2), 119-136, https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2009.49.2.119

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to make sense of Yi Gyu-bo’s (1168-1241) seemingly religious and apolitical text, “Munjomul” (Questions to the Creator), as a political text, and to suggest its vision as a possible prelude to the Goryeo (918-1392)–Joseon (1392-1910) transition. If Neo-Confucianism articulates a political vision for the Joseon dynasty, one can construe that political vision as an answer to the previous dynasty’s long-lasting questions about the relation of the self and politics as the dominant political thought loses ground. To the extent that “Munjomul” shows the weakening state of the ideological foundation of Goryeo, it can be interpreted as the embodiment of the problem, the answer to which was statecraft thought and Neo-Confucianism in early Joseon. This paper sees that Yi Gyu-bo disconnected the link between politics and the power of the God, and foregrounded the issues of the self while Neo- Confucianism forged the link between the self and politics.

keywords
Yi Gyu-bo, “Munjomul, ” Neo-Confucianism, Goryeo-Joseon transition, “Ten Injunctions, ” statecraft, John Duncan, Ancient Style Learning

참고문헌

1.

Bol, Peter K. 1992. This Culture of Ours: Intellectual Transitions in T’ang and Sung China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

2.

Center for Korean Philosophy. 2001. Jaryo-wa haeseol: hanguk-ui cheolhak sasang (Materials and Interpretations: Korean Philosophical Thought). Seoul: Center for Korean Philosophy, Korea University.

3.

Deuchler, Martina. 1992. The Confucian Transformation of Korea: A Study of Society and Ideology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

4.

Duncan, John B. 2000. The Origins of the Joseon Dynasty. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

5.

Eckert, Carter J, et al. 1990. Korea: Old and New. Seoul: Ilchokak.

6.

Imanishi, Ryu 今西龍. 1918. 「高麗太祖訓要十條について」(Concerning Goryeo Taejo’s Ten Injunctions). 『東洋學報』(Journal of Eastern Studies) 8.3.

7.

Ju, Hong-seong, et al. 1988. Joseon cheolhak sasangsa (History of Joseon Philosophical Thought). Yanbian: Yanbian Renmin Chupanshe.

8.

Kim, Choong-Yeol. 1987. Goryeo yuhaksa (History of Goryeo Confucianism). Seoul: Korea University Press.

9.

Kim, Hakjoo. 1979. “Jungguk-e gyeonjueo bon Yi Gyu-bo-ui siron” (Yi Gyubo’s Qi Theory, Compared with That of China). Jindan hakbo (Journal of Jindan Academic Society) 40.

10.

Kim, Seog Gun. 1999. “Hunyo sipjo-wa simu 28 jo” (The Ten Injunctions and 28 Tasks for Current Affairs). Asea yeongu (Journal of Asiatic Studies) 101: 337-369.

11.

Lee, Peter H., and De Bary Wm. Theodore, eds. 1997-2000. Sources of Korean Tradition. Vol. 1. New York: Columbia University Press.

12.

Pocock, J. G. A. 1971. Politics, Language, and Time. New York: Atheneum.

13.

Strauss, Leo. 1988. Persecution and the Art of Writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

14.

Yi, Gyu-bo. 1241/1980. Dongguk isangguk jip (Collected Works of Minister Yi of Korea). Vols. 1-7. Seoul: Minjok Munhwa Chujinhoe.

15.

Yi, Pyeng-do. 1980. Goryeo sidae-ui yeongu (A Study of the Goryeo Period). Seoul: Asea Munwhasa.

Korea Journal

논문 투고 OA 정책