ISSN : 0023-3900
Discussions on inter-Korean peace and unification under the armistice regime have followed one of two trajectories. Some believe that the sustenance of the armistice is equal to peace, drawing a direct connection between the rmistice regime and unification. Other scholars include the establishment of a peace system as a precursor to unification. Additionally, there are two types of unification methodologies: unification by absorption, in which unification occurs through one side’s absorption of the other, and consensus-based unification, which requires the equal participation of the South and the North in the unification process. A combination of a peace system and consensus-based unification is perhaps the most ideal method because a state of peace can be pursued by peaceful means. However, its realization is unlikely because establishing peace on the Korean peninsula is a complex process involving multiple actors including South Korea, North Korea, the United States, and China. This paper explores the conditions for a sustainable peace system on the Korean peninsula based on an exploration of existing debates on the establishment of peace systems.
Acharya, Amitav, and J. D. Kenneth Boutin. 1998. “The Southeast Asia Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone Treaty.” Security Dialogue 29.2.
Chang, Dal-joong, Lee Jung-cheol, and Lim Su-ho. 2011. Bungmi daerip (North Korea-U.S. Confrontation). Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
Cho, Dong June. 2009. “Anbo wihyeop daecheo-haneun jungsoguk-ui seontaek” (Second-Tier States’ Response to Security Threat). Segye jeongchi (World Politics) 30.1.
Choi, Young Jong. 2005. “Pyeonghwa cheje-e daehan ironjeok geomto-wa hanbando pyeonghwa cheje” (A Theoretical Review of the Peace Regime and Applications to the Korean Peninsula). Paper presented at the annual academic conference of the Korean Association of International Studies, Seoul, December 9.
Chun, Chaesung. 2009. “Hanbando tongil-e gwanhan ironjeok gochal” (A Theoretical Review of the Reunification of the Korean Peninsula). Tongil-gwa pyeonghwa (Unification and Peace) 1.1.
Huh, Moon Young, et al. 2007. “Hanbando pyeonghwa cheje: jaryo-wa haeje” (The Peace Regime on the Korean Peninsula: Selected Bibliographies). Seoul: KINU.
Jang, Sok. 2002. Kim Jong-il janggun joguk tongil ron yeongu (A Study of Reunification Theory of General Kim Jong-il). Pyongyang: Pyongyang Publishing House.
Jeong, Tae Wook. 2009. Hanbando pyeonghwa-wa bukhan ingwon: beopcheolhakjeok girok (Peace on the Korean Peninsula and North Korean Human Rights: A History of Legal Philosophy). Paju: Hanul Publishing Co.
Kim, Chul Woo. 2000. Kim Jong-il janggun-ui seongun jeongchi (The Military First Politics of General Kim Jong-il). Pyongyang: Pyongyang Publishing House.
Kim, Samuel. 2010. “North Korea’s Nuclear Strategy and the Interface between International and Domestic Politics.” Asian Perspective 34.1.
Koo, Kab-Woo. 2007. Bipanjeok pyeonghwa yeongu-wa hanbando (A Critical Study of Peace and the Korean Peninsula). Seoul: Humanitas.
Koo, Kab-Woo. 2008. Gukje gwangyehak bipan: gukje gwangye-ui minjuhwa-wa pyeonghwa (A Critique of International Relations: Democratization and Peace in International Relations). Seoul: Humanitas.
Koo, Kab-Woo. 2010. “Noksaek pyeonghwaron-gwa hanbando pyeonghwa cheje: gukga hyeongtae-wa nambuk gwangye” (Green-Peace State Theory and the Peace Regime on the Korean Peninsula: Forms of State and South-North Relations). Tongil-gwa pyeonghwa (Unification and Peace) 2.1.
Krasner, Stephen D., ed. 1983. International Regime. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Lee, Keun-wook. 2007. “Gukje jeongchi-wa oegyo jeongchaek” (International Politics and Foreign Policy). In Hyeondae oegyo jeongchaengon (Contemporary Theories of Foreign Policy), by Kim Kye-dong et al. Seoul: Myungin Munhwasa.
Lee, Soo-hyung. 2009. “Roh Moo-hyun jeongbu-ui dongmaeng jaejojeong jeongchaek: baegyeong, gwajeong, gyeolgwa” (The Roh Moo-hyun Administration’s Policy of Bilateral Alliance Adjustment: Background, Process, and Results). In Jojeonggi-ui hanmi dongmaeng 2003-2008 (Korea-U.S. Alliance in a Period of Adjustment, 2003-2008), edited by Lee Soo-hoon. Seoul: The Institute for Far Eastern Studies.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Mitrany, David. 1943. A Working Peace System. London: RIIA.
Niebuhr, Reinhold. 1992. Dodeokjeok ingan-gwa bidodeokjeok sahoe (Moral Man and Immoral Society). Translated by Lee Hanwoo. Seoul: Moonye Publishing Co. Originally published as Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study of Ethics and Politics (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1932).
Paik, Nak-chung. 2009. “Poyong jeongchaek 2.0 beojeon-i piryo-hada” (Towards an Engagement Policy Version 2.0). Paper presented at the symposium “Korean Peninsula at a Crossroads: In Search of a New Path towards Unification and Peace,” Seoul, September 2.
Park, Kun Young. 2009. “Preparing a Peace Process in the Korean Peninsula.” Asian Perspective 33.3.
Park, Se Il. 2009. “Hanbando wigi-ui bonjil-gwa seonjinhwa poyong tongillon” (Fundamentals of the Korean Peninsula Crisis and Advanced Engagement Unification Theory). Paper presented at the symposium “Korean Peninsula at a Crossroads: In Search of a New Path towards Unification and Peace,” Seoul, September 2.
Peace and Unification Institute. 2010. Jeonjaeng-gwa bundan-eul kkeunnaeneun hanbando pyeonghwa hyeopjeong (The Korean Peninsula Peace Treaty and the End of War and National Division). Paju: Hanul Publishing Co.
Redick, John R. 1981. “The Tlatelolco Regime and Nonproliferation in Latin America.” International Organization 35.1.
Sagan, Douglas, and Kenneth Waltz. 2003. The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.