바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 0023-3900

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.53 No.1
Citation Share

Great Power Rivalries over Korea as Reflected in Political Cartoons

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2013, v.53 no.1, pp.117-142
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2013.53.1.117

(2013). Great Power Rivalries over Korea as Reflected in Political Cartoons. Korea Journal, 53(1), 117-142, https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2013.53.1.117
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

A political cartoon often contains a substantial amount of information that serves to create a particular hypothesis about a historical event. It frequently expresses ideas far more clearly and concisely than words and functions as a powerful tool of communication. It is often intended to affect public opinion or to influence foreign policy, and operates as potentially powerful propaganda. As a result of advances in printing technology, political commentary in journalism flourished at the end of the nineteenth century. In particular, commentary in the form of cartoons spread throughout Europe and even to Meiji Japan through European artists and correspondents. During the latter half of the nineteenth century, political cartoons offered broad analyses of foreign policies toward Korea as well as concise depictions of real events in Korean history. This article examines the historical events that influenced political cartoons and the images of Korea as reflected in cartoons published between 1876 and 1898. This study seeks to enhance the understanding of Korean power politics in a vivid and accessible way and to build momentum toward the use of political cartoons as primary source material.

keywords
international rivalries over Korea, political cartoon, Queen Min, King Gojong, Anglo-Russian rivalry, yangban image, image of Korea, Sino-Japanese War, Li Hongzhang, Georges Bigot

Reference

1.

Bowman, William D., Frank M. Chiteji, and J. Megan Greene. 2007. Imperialism in the Modern World. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

2.

Brynner, Rock. 2006. Empire and Odyssey: The Brynners in Far East Russia and Beyond. Hanover: Steerforth Press.

3.

Choi, Moon-hyung. 2001. Myeongseong hwanghu sihye-ui jinsil-eul balkinda (The Truth about Queen Min’s Assassination). Seoul: Jishik Sanupsa.

4.

Choi, Moon-hyung. 2006. Minbi-wa tareni gorosaretanoka 閔妃は誰に殺されたのか(Who Killed Queen Min?). Tokyo: Sairyusha.

5.

Dickins, Frederick Victor. 1894. The Life of Sir Harry Parkes. Vol. 2. London: Macmillan and Co.

6.

Duus, Peter. 1995. The Abacus and the Sword: The Japanese Penetration of Korea, 1895-1910. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

7.

Han, Sang-il, and Han Jeong-seon. 2006. Ilbon, manhwa-ro jeguk-eul geurida (Japan Draws the Empire with Cartoons). Seoul: Ilchokak.

8.

Inoue, Yuichi 井上勇一. 1989. Higashi ajia tetsudo kokusai kankeishi 東アジア鐵道國際關係史(East Asia Railways and Power Politics). Tokyo: Keio Tsushin.

9.

Jones, Virgil C. 1938. “Foreign Diplomacy in Korea, 1866-1894.” PhD diss., Harvard University.

10.

Langer, William L. 1972. The Diplomacy of Imperialism 1890-1902. 2nd ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

11.

Lee, Min-won. 2001. “Sipgu segimal reosia gunsa gyogwandan-ui hwaldonggwa yeokhal” (Russian Officers and Instructors in Korea at the End of the Nineteenth Century). Gunsa (Military Affairs) 44 (December).

12.

Lee, Shi-joo. 2011. “Li Hongzhang-ui daeil insik-gwa oegyo chaengnyak” (Li Hongzhang’s Perception of Japan and Diplomatic Policy). Dongbuga yeoksa nonchong (Journal of Northeast Asian History) 32 (July).

13.

Lensen, George A. 1982. Balance of Intrigue: International Rivalries in Korea and Manchuria, 1884-1899. Vol. 2. Tallahassee: University Press of Florida.

14.

Malozemoff, Andrew. 1958. Russian Far Eastern Policy, 1881-1904. Berkeley: University of California Press.

15.

Mutel, Gustave Charles. 2008. Mutel jugyo ilgi (Bishop Mutel’s Diary). Vol. 2. Seoul: Research Institute for Korean Church History.

16.

Mutsu, Munemitsu 陸奧宗光. 1982. Kenkenroku: A Diplomatic Record of the Sino-Japanese War, 1894-95. Edited and translated by Gordon Mark Berger. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. Originally published as Kenkenroku 蹇蹇錄(n.p., 1923).

17.

Oh, Young-seop. 2006. “Gojong-gwa chunsaengmun sageon” (King Gojong and Anti-Japanese Plot). Hyangto seoul (Local Seoul) 68 (October).

18.

Park, Jong-hyo. 1997. Russo-Japanese War in 1904-1905 and Korea. Moscow: Eastern Literature.

19.

Park, Jong-hyo. 2002. Reosia gungnip munseo bogwanso sojang hanguk gwangye munseo yoyakjip (Russian Documents concerning Korea in AVPRI, RGVIA, and GARF). Seoul: Korea Foundation.

20.

Paine, Sarah C. M. 2003. The Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895: Perceptions, Power, and Primacy. New York: Cambridge University.

21.

Polak, Christian. 2005. “Georges Bigot et la guerre russo-japonaise” (Georges Bigot and the Russo-Japanese War). In Faits et imaginaires de la guerre russo-japonaise (1904-1905) (Facts and the Imaginary World of the Russo-Japanese War [1904-1905]), edited by Dany Savelli. Paris: Éditions Kailash.

22.

Seok, Huajeong. 2007. Pungjahwa-ro boneun reoil jeonjaeng (The Russo-Japanese War in Political Cartoons). Seoul: Jisik Sanupsa.

23.

Seok, Huajeong. 2010. Russo-Japanese War Seen through Satirical Cartoons. Tokyo: Sairyusha.

24.

Shimizu, Isao. 2005. “La guerre russo-japonaise à travers la caricature de presse” (The Russo-Japanese War Seen Through Press Caricature). In Faits et imaginaires de la guerre russo-japonaise (1904-1905) (Facts and the Imaginary World of the Russo-Japanese War [1904-1905]), edited by Dany Savelli. Paris: Éditions Kailash.

25.

Spencer, Herbert. 1864. Illustrations of Universal Progress. New York: D. Appleton and Company.

26.

Tsiang, T’ing-fu. 1933. “Sino-Japanese Diplomatic Relations, 1870-84.” Chinese Social and Political Science Review 17.

Korea Journal

e-Submission OA Policy