바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

Korea Journal

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343
  • A&HCI, SCOPUS, KCI

ISSN : 0023-3900

논문 상세

다음
논문 투고

Vol.53 No.2

Citation Share

Dasan’s Metacritique on the Seongni Debate in Joseon Neo-Confucianism

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2013, v.53 no.2, pp.10-30
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2013.53.2.10
이승환 (고려대학교)
이승환. (2013). . Korea Journal, 53(2), 10-30, https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2013.53.2.10

Abstract

This article defines Dasan’s view on the Seongni debate as “metaphilosophy.” Metaphilosophy is often dubbed the “philosophy of philosophy” or “second-order philosophy.” The word “meta” has Greek origins, meaning “after” or “beyond.” A metaphilosopher stays outside of an ongoing philosophical debate or problem and conducts a second-order review of its nature, purpose, and method, instead of being directly involved in the debate. If a metaphilosopher is defined as such, Dasan, then, can be regarded as the first and foremost metaphilosopher in the Neo-Confucian history of Joseon. Instead of engaging in the intense Seongni debate of his time as a participant, he remained outside the debate and criticized its nature, goals, and methodology from a second-order perspective. As a metaphilosopher, Dasan employed methodological tools, such as linguistic analysis. This article analyzes Dasan’s metaphilosophical stance on the Seongni debate and concludes that his metaphilosophical perspective provided a turning point in the history of Joseon Neo-Confucianism.

keywords
Dasan Jeong Yak-yong, Seongni debate, metaphilosophy, metacritique, Joseon Neo-Confucianism

참고문헌

1.

Yi, Hwang. 1598. Toegyejip 退溪集 (Collected Writings of Toegye Yi Hwang).

2.

Jeong, Yak-yong. n.d. Simunjip 詩文集 (Verses and Essays).

3.

Jeong, Yak-yong . n.d. Yeoyudang jeonseo 與猶堂全書 (Complete Works of Yeoyudang Jeong Yak-yong).

4.

Jeong, Yak-yong . 1784. Jungyong ganguibo 中庸講義補 (Supplement to the Discussion on the Doctrine of the Mean).

5.

Jeong, Yak-yong . 1815. Simgyeong milheom 心經密驗 (Private Examination of the Classic of Mind-and-Heart).

6.

Brandt, Richard. 1959. Ethical Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

7.

Brandt, Richard . 1979. A Theory of the Good and the Right. New York: Oxford University Press.

8.

Firth, Richard. 1952. “Ethical Absolutism and the Ideal Observer.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 123 (March).

9.

Harman, Gilbert. 1977. The Nature of Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.

10.

Kim, Young-woo. 2005. “Dasan-ui sadan chiljeongnon gochal” (A Study of Dasan’s Conception of the Four Beginnings and the Seven Feelings). Dasanhak (Journal of Dasan Studies) 6.

11.

Lee, Seung-Hwan. 1998. “Zhu Xi-ui hyeongisanghak-e natanan gongjikja yulligwan yeongu” (An Analysis of the Moral Sensibility of Public Officers in Zhu Xi’s Metaphysics). Dongyang cheolhak (Journal of Asian Philosophy in Korea) 10.

12.

Lee, Seung-Hwan . 2012a. “Seongnihak-ui giho baechi bangsik-gwa joseon yuhak-ui bungi” (The Neo-Confucian Semiotic Arrangement Method and the Divergence of Neo-Confucian Schools during the Joseon Period). Dongyang cheolhak yeongu (Journal of Eastern Philosophy) 70.

13.

Lee, Seung-Hwan . 2012b. “Toegye-ui ‘hoengseol’-gwa gobong-ui ‘suseol’” (Yi Hwang’s “Horizontal Frame” and Ki Dae-seung’s “Vertical Frame”). Toegye hakbo (Journal of Toegye Studies) 131.

14.

Lee, Seung-Hwan . 2012c. “Ugye-ui ‘hoengseol’-gwa yulgok-ui ‘suseol’” (Seong Hon’s “Horizontal Frame” and Yi I’s “Vertical Frame”). Yugyo sasang munhwa yeongu (Study of Confucian Philosophy and Culture) 48.

Korea Journal

논문 투고 OA 정책