바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

Korea Journal

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343
  • A&HCI, SCOPUS, KCI

ISSN : 0023-3900

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.55 No.4

Citation Share

Power and Violence between the Choosers and the Chosen in the Thought of Dasan Jeong Yak-yong

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2015, v.55 no.4, pp.36-55
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2015.55.4.36
이종우 (성균관대학교)
이종우. (2015). . Korea Journal, 55(4), 36-55, https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2015.55.4.36

Abstract

According to Dasan Jeong Yak-yong, a ruler was chosen by the people as a chief who could resolve conflict. People in a community chose group leaders and then finally chose a ruler. Therefore, rulers could be ousted if they did not play their roles properly, which equated to righteous power in Dasan’s thought, because the ruler would be ousted for not supporting the people or developing harmony among them. If a ruler abused his power or failed to carry out his responsibilities, provincial leaders could replace him, a mechanism rooted in the people. Therefore, the people could supplant the ruler. However, Dasan did not state implicitly that the people could replace the ruler, but rather that provincial leaders should decide, because Dasan advocated strengthening sovereign power in the case of King Jeongjo. Dasan illustrated the exemplary relationship between the people and the ruler through examples of rebellious subjects during China’s Yin Dynasty. Dasan acknowledged that even a good ruler might encounter opposition. He believed that power and violence, or righteous authority and violent force, should be used according to the presence or absence of communal support and harmony. Support and harmony meant peace and thus determined the implementation of authority.

keywords
people, the ruler, emperor, Tang and Wu, Jie and Zhou, support, harmony

참고문헌

1.

Confucius. 1970. Lunyu 論語 (Analects of Confucius). Seoul: Daedong Institute for Korean Studies, Sungkyunkwan University.

2.

Huang, Zongxi. 2001. Mingyi daifang lu 明夷待訪錄 (Waiting for the Dawn: A Plan for the Prince). Taipei: Sanmin Shuju.

3.

Jeong, Yak-yong. 2002. Yeoyudang jeonseo 與猶堂全書 (Complete Works of Yeoyudang Jeong Yak-yong). Seoul: Institute for the Translation of Korean Classics.

4.

Mencius. 1970. Mengzi 孟子 (Mencius). Seoul: Daedong Institute for Korean Studies, Sungkyunkwan University.

5.

Ricci, Matteo. 1923. Tianzhu shiyi 天主實義 (True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven). Shanghai: Shanghai Tushanyin Shuguan.

6.

Sima, Qian. 1983. Shiji 史記 (Records of the Grand Historian). Taipei: Hongye Shuju.

7.

Xing, Bing. 1871. Lunyu zhushu 論語注疎 (Commentary on the Analects of Confucius). Hunan: Baoqing Wuben Shuju.

8.

Zhu, Xi. 1970. Lunyu jizhu 論語集註 (Collected Annotations on the Analects of Confucius). Seoul: Daedong Institute for Korean Studies, Sungkyunkwan University.

9.

Zhu, Xi.. 1970. Mengzi jizhu 孟子集註 (Collected Annotations on the Mencius). Seoul: Daedong Institute for Korean Studies, Sungkyunkwan University.

10.

An, Byeong-jik. 1999. “Dasan-ui hudaeron” (Theory of People’s Choice of Lord in Dasan). Hanguk silhak yeongu (Korean Silhak Studies) 1: 274–304.

11.

Bae, Dong-in. 1987. “Pongnyeok-e daehan sahoehakjeok gochal” (A Study of the Sociology of Violence). Hanguk sahoehak (Korean Sociology) 21: 1187–1213.

12.

Baek, Chul-hyun. 2003. “Jeongyagyong-ui mingwon uisik-gwa gungmin jugwonnoneuroui ihaeng ganeungseong-e gwanhan yeongu” (A Study of People’s Rights in Jeong Yak-yong and Its Possible Transition to Popular Sovereignty). Hanguk haengjeong sahakji (Korean Public Administration History Review)12: 1–25.

13.

Bak, Hyeon-mo. 2003. “Jeongyagyongui gunjuron: Jeongjowaui gwangyereul jungsimeuro”(A Theory of the Monarch in Jeong Yak-yong: Focusing on Jeong Yak-yong and King Jeongjo). Jeongchi sasang yeongu (The Korean Review of Political Thought) 8: 7–30.

14.

Baker, Don. 2002. “Thomas Aquinas and Chong Yagyong: Rebels within Tradition.”Dasanhak (Journal of Dasan Studies) 3: 32–69.

15.

Baker, Don. 2009. “Silcheon yullihak-gwa silhak: dodeok suyang-e daehan Dasanui jeopgeun” (Practical Ethics and Practical Learning: Tasan’s Approach to Moral Cultivation). Hanguk silhak yeongu (Korean Silhak Studies) 18: 171–217.

16.

Choe, Han-gyu., and Yeon Myeong-mo. 2009. “Joseonjo songnihakjeok gunsin gwangye-ui gwollyeok gujo yeongu: Sambong-gwa Dasan-ui bigyo bunseok”(A Study on the Structure of Political Power in the Neo-Confucian Relationship between King and Subject during the Joseon Dynasty: Comparing Sambong and Dasan). Hanguk haengjeong sahakji (Korean Public Administration History Review) 25: 133–163.

17.

Chung, So-Yi. 2013. “Dasan’s Moral Epistemology.” Korea Journal 53.2: 105–123.

18.

David-West, Alzo. 2011. “Between Confucianism and Marxism-Leninism: Juche and the Case of Jeong Dasan.” Korean Studies 35: 93–121.

19.

Han, Sang-ik. 2002. “Dasan-ui mongminnon: minbon-eul neomeo minjuro” (Dasan’s Theory on Governing the People: From Confucian Democracy to Modern Democracy). Yeoksawa sahoe (History and Society) 28: 125–154.

20.

Im, Hyeong-taek., and Yi, U-seong, eds. 1990. “Dasan-ui ‘min’ juche jeongchi sasangui ironjeok·hyeonsiljeok geunjeo” (The Theoretical and the Practical Foundation of the Idea of Democracy in Dasan). In Minjoksa-ui jeongae-wa geu munhwa, 251–277. Seoul: Changbi.

21.

Jo, Gwang. 1976. “Jeongyagyong-ui mingwon uisik yeongu” (A Study of Popular Rights in Jeong Yak-yong). Asea yeongu (The Journal of Asiatic Studies) 56:81–118.

22.

Jo, Seong-eul. 1998. “Jeongyagyongui toji jedo gaehyeongnon” (Jeong Yak-yong’s Theory of Land System Reform). Hanguk sasang sahak (The Study of Korean History of Thought) 10: 99–137.

23.

Kim, Yong-hun. 2001. “Jeongyagyong-ui minbon uisik-gwa mingwon uisik” (People-based Thought and People’s Rights in Jeong Yak-yong). Toegyehak (Toegye Studies) 12: 75–97.

24.

Lee, Yong-ju. 2013. “‘Gyeongse silhak-ui jisik silcheon” (Practicing Knowledge of the “Practical Learning of Statecraft”). Dasanhak (Journal of Dasan Studies)22: 145–191.

25.

Song, Nak-seon. 2008. “Dasan Jeongyagyong-ui gyeongse sasang-gwa mingwonnonjok insingnon-e gwanhan yeongu” (A Study on the Epistemology of Governing Thought and People’s Rights in Dasan Jeong Yak-yong). Hanguk haengjeong sahakji (Korean Public Administration History Review) 23: 1–28.

26.

Yamaguchi, Koichi (Sannae Hongil 山內弘一). 2000. “Gyeongseong gwijok euroseo-ui geungji: Jeongyagyong-ui gwicheon-gwa hwai-e daehan ihae” (The Pride of Nobles Living in the Capital City: Jeong Yak-yong’s Understanding of High and Low Jobs, China and the Barbarian). Dasanhak (Journal of Dasan Studies) 1: 292–331.

Korea Journal

논문 투고 OA 정책