바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

Korea Journal

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343
  • A&HCI, SCOPUS, KCI

ISSN : 0023-3900

논문 상세

다음
논문 투고

Vol.56 No.4

Citation Share

Treaties Leading to Japan’s Annexation of Korea: What Are the Problems?

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2016, v.56 no.4, pp.5-32
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2016.56.4.5
이태진 (서울대학교)
이태진. (2016). . Korea Journal, 56(4), 5-32, https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2016.56.4.5

Abstract

In August of 1910, the Japanese Empire annexed the Korean Empire (Daehan Jeguk 大韓帝國; also known as the Great Han Empire), the culmination of a step-by-step seizure of Korea’s national sovereignty by means of a military force that was used starting from the Russo-Japanese War (1904–1905). In this process, the Japanese Empire coerced five treaties from Korea: (1) Japan–Korea Protocol (February 23, 1904); (2) 1st Japan–Korea Agreement (August 22, 1904); (3) 2nd Japan–Korea Agreement, or Eulsa Treaty (November 17, 1905); (4) Japan–Korea Treaty of 1907 (July 24, 1907); and (5) Japan–Korea Annexation Treaty (August 29, 1910). It is well known that the above treaties were forced upon the Korean emperor and ministers through threats. This article examines how these treaties not only did not follow the standard form of treaties, but also how the Japanese government in fact prepared the documents that should rightly have been prepared by the Korean government. This article also focuses on how the Japanese government, in the translated English versions of the treaties, added words that were not present in the original treaties in order to convince the Western powers that the treaties were flawless in terms of their respect of national sovereignty. In addition, regarding Japan’s Treaty of Korean Annexation of 1910, this article shows how both the Korean and the Japanese versions not only used the same paper, but also the same strap and font. These facts constitute clear objective evidence that the annexation of Korea was done without the consent of the Korean Empire. The author expects this study to be utilized as evidence in proving the illegality of the Japanese annexation of Korea.

keywords
Japanese annexation of Korea, illegality of treaties, forceful signing, falsification of signature, King Gojong, King Sunjong

참고문헌

1.

Bouvier, John, and Francis Rawle. 1897. Bouvier’s Law Dictionary: A New Edition. Boston: Boston Book Company.

2.

Kang, Seong-eun. 2002. Eulsa 5 joyak yeongu (A Study of the Eulsa Treaty of 1905). Tokyo: Chosen University Press.

3.

Kim, Mun-ja. 2009. Chosen ohi satsugai to nihonjin 朝鮮王妃殺害と日本人 (The Japanese and the Assassination of the Korean Queen). Tokyo: Kobunken.

4.

Shaw, Carole Cameron. 2007. The Foreign Destruction of Korean Independence. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

5.

Unno, Fukuju 海野福壽. 1995. Nikkankyoyaku to kankoku heigo 日韓協約と韓國倂合 (Japan–Korea Treaties and the Annexation of Korea). Tokyo: Akashi Shoten.

6.

Yi, Tae-Jin. 1995. Ilbon-ui daehan jeguk gangjeom (Japanese Annexation of the Korean Empire). Seoul: Kkachi.

7.

Yi, Tae-Jin. 1998a. “Kankoku heigo wa seiritsu shiteinai 韓國倂合は成立していない” (The Annexation of the Korean Empire Was Not Legally Established), pt. 1. Sekai (World) 650: 300–310.

8.

Yi, Tae-Jin 1998a. “Kankoku heigo wa seiritsu shiteinai 韓國倂合は成立していない” (The Annexation of the Korean Empire Was Not Legally Established), pt. 2. Sekai (World) 651: 185–196.

9.

Yi, Tae-Jin. 2000a. “Ryakushiki joyaku de kokkeno ijo dekirunoka: Unno kyoju no hihan 略式条約で国権を委譲できるのか: 海野敎授の批判” (How Could State Sovereignty Be Surrendered with a Summary Treaty? In Reply to Prof. Unno Fukuju’s Criticisms), pt. 1. Sekai 世界 (World) 674: 246–255.

10.

Yi, Tae-Jin. 2000b. “Ryakushiki joyaku de kokkeno ijo dekirunoka: Unno kyoju no hihan 略式条約で国権を委譲できるのか: 海野敎授の批判” (How Could State Sovereignty Be Surrendered with a Summary Treaty? In Reply to Prof. Unno Fukuju’s Criticisms), pt. 2. Sekai 世界 (World) 675: 272–280.

11.

Yi, Tae-Jin. 2003. “1904–1910 nyeon hanguk gugkwon chimtal joyakdeul-ui jeolchasang bulbeopseong” (Illegality in the Procedure of Treaties Forced to Deprive the Sovereignty of Korean Empire during 1904–1910). In Hanguk byeonghap-ui bulbeopseong yeongu (A Study on the Illegality of the Japanese Annexation of Korea), edited by Yi Tae-Jin et al. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

12.

Yi, Tae-Jin. 2007. The Dynamics of Confucianism and Modernization in Korean History. Cornell East Asia Series 136. Ithaca, NY: East Asia Program, Cornell University.

13.

Yi, Tae-Jin, and Lee Sang-chan. 2010. Joyak-euro bon hanguk byeonghap: bulbeopseong-ui jeunggeodeul (Evidences of the Illegality of the Treaties Leading to the Japanese Annexation of Korea). Seoul: Northeast Asian History Foundation.

14.

Yi, Tae-Jin, and Sasagawa Norigatsu. 2009. Hanguk byeonghap-gwa hyeondae: yeoksajeok gukjebeopjeok jaegeomto (The Japanese Annexation of Korea and the Present Age: Reconsideration from the Perspectives of History and International Law). Seoul: Taehaksa.

15.

Yun, Dae-won. 2011. Terauchi Masatake tonggam-ui gangje byeonghap gongjak-gwa hanguk byeonghap-ui bulbeopseong (Japanese Governor-General Terauchi Masatake’s Maneuvering for the Enforcement of the Annexation Treaty and the Illegality of Japan’s Annexation of Korea). Seoul: Somyung.

Korea Journal

논문 투고 OA 정책