바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

Validation Study of the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale(BASIS-32)

Abstract

BASIS-32 is one of the measurement derived from patient perspectives and covers the major symptoms and functioning difficulties experienced as a result of mental illness. This study was conducted to verify the reliability and validity for the BASIS-32 designed to assess the patient's self-ratings, which could presented different way from clinician. The research packet was administerd to 190 psychiatric patients: BASIS-32, GHQ, SCL-90-R. BASIS-32's reliability was tested by internal consistency, item-total correlation and test-retest reliability. Its validity was tested by factor analysis, concurrent validity, and discriminant validity. BASIS-32 was reliable in terms of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and corrected item -total correlation r ranged from .49 to .72. The exploratory factor analysis revealed that BASIS-32 had 5 factors. In addition, estimates of validity of BASIS-32 were established with the criterion measures in conceptually expected ways. Correlations between BASIS-32 and GHQ, symptom subscales of SCL-90-R showed sufficient concurrent validity. These results offer the reliability and validity for BASIS-32. Using BASIS-32 assessed patient's subjective clinical symptoms and difficulties, more comprehensive information could be obtained. The implications and limitations of this study were discussed, and future directions of study were suggested.

keywords
behavior and symptom identification, psychiatric outcome measure, reliability, validity, factor analysis, mental health service, 행동 및 증상평가, 정신과적 성과평가, 신뢰도, 타당도, 요인분석, 정신건강서비스

Reference

1.

김광일, 김재환, 원호택 (1984). 간이정신진단검사. 서울, 중앙출판사.

2.

박훈기, 박희순, 김용은, 서홍관, 김창엽, 황인홍, 허봉연 (1990). 질병이 가족에게 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 가정의, 11(4), 1-11.

3.

배 안, 홍창희 (2010). 정신건강회복척도의 타당화 연구. 신경정신의학, 49(6), 82-89.

4.

배정규, 손명자, 이종구 (2009). 정신장애인의 재기태도가 삶의 질에 미치는 영향: 모형검증을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 28(3), 605-627.

5.

이훈진, 문혜신, 박현진, 유성진, 김지영 (2007). MMPI-2 성격 및 정신병리 평가. 서울, 시그마프레스.

6.

황태연 (2000). 정신사회적 기능과 증상파악척도의 타당화 연구. 용인정신의학보, 7, 49 -60.

7.

Cameron, I. M., Eagles, J. M., Howie, F. L., Andrew J. E., Crawford J. R., Kohler C., Eisen S. V., & Naji S. A. (2004). Preliminary validation of a UK-modified version of the BASIS-32. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 5, 41-48.

8.

Chun Chung Chow, J., Snowden, L. R., McConnell, W. (2001). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the BASIS-32 in Racial and Ethnic samples. Journal of Behavior and Health Service Research. 28(4), 400-411.

9.

Derogatis, L. R. (1977). SCL-90 (Revision) Manual I. Clinical Psychometrics Research Unit, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

10.

Eisen, S. V., Dill, D. L., & Grob, M. C. (1994). Reliability and validity of a brief patient -report instrument for psychiatric outcome evaluation. Hosp Community Psychiatry, 45, 242 -247.

11.

Eisen, S. V., Normand, S. L., Belanger, A. J., Spiro, A., & Esch, D. (2004). The Revised Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale: reliability and validity. Medical Care, 42(12), 1230-1241.

12.

Goldberg, D. P., & Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9, 139-145.

13.

Trauer, T. (1998). Issues in the assessment of outcome in mental health. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 32, 337-343.

14.

Trauer, T. (2004). Consumer and service determinants of completion of a consumer self-rating outcome measure. Australian Psychiatry, 12, 48-54.

15.

Ware J. E. Jr., & Gandek, B. (1998). Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment(IQOLA) Project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 903-12.

logo