바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.21 No.4

Citation Share

A Study on the Interchangeability between a Thesaurus and an Ontology

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2004, v.21 no.4, pp.27-47
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.4.027


& (2004). A Study on the Interchangeability between a Thesaurus and an Ontology. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 21(4), 27-47, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.4.027

Abstract

In this study, the experiment was made to transform the relationship among terms in a thesaurus to ontology language as search tools for multilingual text. As a result, the equivalent relationship in the thesaurus can be expressed by different ways in the ontology, such as equivalentClass, equivalentProperty, sameAS, and so on. On the other hand, the associative relationship can be represented by ObjectProperty, DatatypeProperty, and inverseOf. For this test, first of all, the descriptors assigned by AAT and the descriptors from bilingual thesaurus by ICCD were translated into Korean. Then, the facet was used for conceptual equivalence among terms from different languages. The result of the study showed that using rdf:Property in ontology was the most effective way of transforming multilingual thesaurus into ontology.

keywords
시소러스, 용어 관계설정, 온톨로지, OWL, 패싯 시스템thesaurus, term relationships, ontology, OWL, facet system

Reference

1.

김은경. (2004). 시맨틱 웹을 위한 온톨로지 구축방법에 관한 비교연구. 정보관리연구, 35(2), 57-85.

2.

김은경. (2004). 시맨틱 웹을 위한 온톨로지 구축방법에 관한 비교연구.

3.

남영준. (2004). 대등관계 설정의 확장 지침에 관한 연구.

4.

남영준. (2003). 소러스의 대등관계에 관한 연구. 문헌정보학보, 6, 143-175.

5.

오삼균. (2002). 맨틱웹 기술과 활용방안. 정보관리학회지, 19(4), 297-320.

6.

University College of Borås. (2009). School of Library and Information Science. http://www.adm.hb.se/personal/mol/gslt/thesauri.pdf.

7.

NISO. (2003). Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual Thesauri: ANSI/NISO Z39.19 - 2003:the American National Standards Institute.

8.

NISO/ASI/ALCTS. (2009). orkshop on Electronic Thesauri: Planning for a Standard. http://www.niso.org/news/events_workshops/thesau99.html#issues.

9.

Seetharama, S. (1975). Term-Concept Relationship in an Information Retrieval Thesaurus (80-87). Seminar on thesaurus in Information Systems. DRTC and INSDOC.

10.

Smith, Michael K., Chris Welty, and Deborah L. McGuinness. (2009). OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy