- P-ISSN1013-0799
- E-ISSN2586-2073
- KCI
Article Contents
- 2024 (Vol.41)
- 2023 (Vol.40)
- 2022 (Vol.39)
- 2021 (Vol.38)
- 2020 (Vol.37)
- 2019 (Vol.36)
- 2018 (Vol.35)
- 2017 (Vol.34)
- 2016 (Vol.33)
- 2015 (Vol.32)
- 2014 (Vol.31)
- 2013 (Vol.30)
- 2012 (Vol.29)
- 2011 (Vol.28)
- 2010 (Vol.27)
- 2009 (Vol.26)
- 2008 (Vol.25)
- 2007 (Vol.24)
- 2006 (Vol.23)
- 2005 (Vol.22)
- 2004 (Vol.21)
- 2003 (Vol.20)
- 2002 (Vol.19)
A Study on Costs of Digital Preservation
Abstract
To guarantee the long-term access to digital material, digital preservation needs to be systemized, and detailed investigation on cost elements of digital preservation should be done for the continued support of budget. To meet the needs in this area, this paper categorized the digital preservation cost into direct and indirect cost through deriving common elements used in prior research on this issue. For case analysis, two institutions, representing domestic University Library and National Library of Korea under large-scale digitization currently, are selected to analyze the current status of digital preservation and estimate the preservation cost. The case analysis shows the systematic preservation function should be performed to guarantee the long-term access digital material, even though a basic digital preservation is currently conducted. It was projected that the digital preservation cost for the two libraries, accounting for 11.8% and 8.6% of digitization cost, respectively, should be injected every year. However, the estimated figures are very conservative, because the cost for estimating the preservation function, such as installing digital repository and producing meta data, was excluded in the estimation. This proves that digital preservation is a synthetic activity linked directly and indirectly to various activities from production to access of digital object and an essential costs that should be considered from the beginning stage of digitization project.
- keywords
- digital preservation, cost analysis, cost elements, direct preservation cost, indirect preservation cost, preservation cost, 디지털 보존, 비용분석, 비용요소, 직접보존비용, 간접보존비용, 보존비용, digital preservation, cost analysis, cost elements, direct preservation cost, indirect preservation cost, preservation cost
Reference
(2003). 전자저널의 관리 및 서비스에 관한 연구. , 3-39.
(2003). 전자저널의 효과적인 관리 및 이용자 서비스에 관한 연구 대학도서관을 중심으로. , 135-156.
(2002). 디지털 아카이빙의 표준화와 OAIS 참조모형. , 45-68.
(2004). 디지털 아카이브의 영구적 보존을 위한 개념적 모형 설계에 관한 연구. , 13-34.
(2001). 전자저널의 아카이빙에 관한 연구 정보관리연구. , 139-157.
(2003). 레코드관리를 위한 ISO 표준 해설. , -.
(2002). Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System. , 0-650.
(2001). “The Paradox of Digital Preservation. , -.
(2000). “Comparing Preservation Strategies and Practices for Elec- tronic records New Review of Academic Librarianship. , 205-16.
(2001). “Routing Indices for Peer-to- Peer Systems. , -.
2000 “The Case for Institutional Repositories. , -.
(1999[cited2004). The Long term preser- vation of the uthenticity of Elect- ronic records 4th General Conference of EASTICA. , -.
([cited2004). 2000 “Emulation as a Digital Preservation Strategy. , -.
(1998[cited2004). “Comparison of Me- thods & Costs of Digital Preser- vation. , -.
(2000[cited2004). “Best Practices for Digital Archiving. , -.
(2000). “Risk Mana- gement of Digital Information Council on Library and Information Resources. , -.
(2000[cited2004org/eventspres-2000/cloonan). Comparing Preservation Stra- tegies and Practices for Electronic records University of California. , -.
(2000[cited2001). Records Management gui- dance for Agencies Implimenting Electronic Signature technologies. , -.
(1999). “Ensuring the Lon- gevity of Digital Documents. , 46-47.
(2000). “Cost Elements of Digital Preser- vation. , -.
(2002). “Toward Developing a Framework of Cost Elements for Preserving Authentic Electronic Re- cords into Perpetuity. , 388-404.
(1998). “Transforming Lib- raries Through Digital Preservation. , -.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations