바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

A Design and Implementation of Application Profile Core Ontology

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2007, v.24 no.3, pp.245-269
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2007.24.3.245


Abstract

The standard metadata systems are very popular for the description of structures and semantics of information resources to realize sharing and exchanging information in global ubiquitous environment. In real application domain, various metadata elements are reused together with mix-and-match manner. An application system using diverse metadata systems is compelled with refinement and interoperability of metadata elements. Application profile is the general approach to resolve the various problems occurred in metadata application systems. This paper proposes Application Profile Core Ontology (APO) that can achieve the goals and functions of application profile, and describes metadata application system based on APO.

keywords
응용 프로파일, 코어 온톨로지, 메타데이터, 상호 운용성, application profile, Core Ontology, APO, metadata, interoperability

Reference

1.

(2002). 메타데이터간 상호 운용성을 위한 비교 연구: MARC, Dublin Core, ONIX 메타데이터요소를 중심으로. 33(2), 276-301.

2.

(2007). 시맨틱 라이브러리를 위한 아키텍처 참조 모델. 24(1), 75-101.

3.

(2004). Is it Time for a Moratorium on Metadata. , 10-17.

4.

(2006). Metadata Interoperability and Standardization ?C A Study of Methodology Part I: Achieving Interoperability at the Schema Level. 12(6), -.

5.

(2006). DCMI Metadata Terms. , -.

6.

(2006). Application Profiles for Learning. 05(07), 242-246.

7.

(2004). A Repository of Metadata Crosswalks. 10(12), -.

8.

(2000). Application profiles: mixing and matching metadata schemas. , -.

9.

(2000). An XML Schema Approach to Application Profiles. , -.

10.

(2001). Combining RDF and XML Schemas to Enhance Interoperability Between Metadata Application Profiles. , -.

11.

(2006). Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries. 3(2), -.

12.

(2006). MetaMap. [cited 2006. 8. 14].<http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december04/godby/12godby.html>. , -.

13.

(2006). Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. , -.

14.

(2006a). Representing and Reasoning with Application Profiles Based on OWL and OWL/XDD. 4185, 256-262.

15.

(2006b). OWL/XDD: A Formal Language for Application Profiles. , 1-6.

16.

(2000). Schemas Second Workshop. , -.

17.

(2003). Schemas Registry. 2003. [cited 2007. 8. 14].<http://www.schemas-forum.org/registry/>. , -.

18.

(2005). Models and Requirements of Metadata Metadata Projects at Tsukuba and Lesson Learned. , -.

19.

(2005). SKOS Core Vokabular. , -.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management