This study aims to explore a new technique making complementary linkage between controlled vocabularies and uncontrolled vocabularies for analyzing a research domain. Co-word analysis can be largely divided into two based on the types of vocabulary used: controlled and uncontrolled. In the case of using controlled vocabulary, data sparseness and indexer effect are inherent drawbacks. On the other case, word selection by the author's perspective and word ambiguity. To complement each other, we suggest a descriptor profiling that represents descriptors(controlled vocabulary) as the co-occurrence with words from the text(uncontrolled vocabulary). Applying the profiling to the domain of information science implies that this method can complement each other by reducing the inherent shortcoming of the controlled and uncontrolled vocabulary.
김판준. (2006). 로치오 알고리즘을 이용한 학술지 논문의 디스크립터 자동부여에 관한 연구. 23(3), 69-90.
이재윤. (2005). 계량서지적 동시출현 분석에 관한 방법론적 고찰. , -.
이재윤. (2007). 클러스터링 기반 네트워크 생성 알고리즘. , 147-154.
Bhattacharya, Sujit. (1998). Mapping a research area at the micro level using co-word analysis. 43(3), 359-372.
Buter, R.K. (2002.July). Using bibliometric maps to visualize term distribution in scientific papers. , 697-705.
Callon, M. (1986). Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. , -.
Callon, M. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. , -.
Courtial, J.-P. (1984). Is indexing trustworthy? Classification of articles through co-word analysis. , 47-56.
de Nooy, W. (2005). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. , -.
Ding, Y. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. 37(6), 817-842.
He, Qin. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. 48(1), 133-159.
Jacobs, N. (2002). Co-term network analysis as a means of describing the information landscapes of knowledge communities across sectors. 58(5), 548-562.
Jassens, F. (2006). Towards mapping library and information science. 42(6), 1614-1642.
Kostoff, R. N. (1993). Database tomography for technical intelligence. , -.
Kostoff, R. N. (2005). Power source roadmaps using bibliometrics and database tomography. 30(5), 709-730.
McCain, Katherine W. (1995.June). R&D themes in information science: A preliminary co-descriptor analysis. , 275-282.
Noyons, E.C.M. (1998). Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: self-organized structuring to map neural network research. 49(1), 68-81.
Porter, Alan L. (2005). Tech Mining: Exploiting New Technologies for Competitive Advantage. , -.
Spasser, M. A. (1997). Mapping the terrain of pharmacy: co-classification analysis of the international pharmaceutical abstracts database. 39(1), 77-97.
Tijssen, R.J.W. (1992). A Quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: co-classification analysis of energy research. , 27-44.
Todorov, R. (1989). Co-classification analysis for science mapping: an example from superconductivity. , 263-270.
Todorov, R. (1990). Mapping Australian geophysics: a co-heading analysis. , 1-2.
Voutilainen, A. (1993). NPtool. a detector of English noun phrases. , -.
Watts, R. J. (2004). Automated text mining comparison of Japanese and USA multi-robot research. , 61-74.
Widhalm, Clemens. (2001.July). Co-occurrence and knowledge mapping to identify hot topics and key players in the field of mobility and transport. , 751-758.