The purpose of this study was to discover the factors which motivate academic library users to use chat reference service and which demotivate academic library users to use chat reference service. To achieve the study purposes, this study conducted interview with the selected participants (Information Studies graduate students at Florida State University(FSU)) through email in April and May 2007. This study found that 1) convenience, 2) anonymity, and 3) inexpensiveness of the service served as incentives(motivators) for chat reference service consumers to use the service. On the other hand, chat reference service consumers mentioned the following factors as obstacles (demotivators) for using the service: 1) waiting time, 2) accessibility, 3) interface design, and 4) difficulties with expressing themselves in a virtual space.
Jeffrey Pomerantz. (2005). A Conceptual Framework and Open Research Questions for Chat-Based Reference Service. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(12), 1288-1302.
Steve Coffman. (2004). To Chat or Not to Chat-Taking Another Look at Virtual Reference. Information Today, 12(7), -.
Lynn Westbrook. (2007). Chat reference communication patterns and implications: applying politeness theory. Journal of Documentation, 63(5), 638-658.
Jeffrey Pomerantz. (2006). Motivations and uses: Evaluating virtual reference service from the users’ perspective. Library & Information Science Researc, 28, 350-373.
Patience L. Simmonds. (2001). Usage of Academic Libraries: The Role of Service Quality, Resources, and User Characteristics. Library Trend, 49(4), 626-634.
Maurice P. Marchant. (1991). What Motivate Adult Use of Public Libraries?. Library & Information Science Research, 13, 201-235.
John C. Creswell. (2003). Educational Research:Upper Saddle River.