바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

음악정보 검색에서 이용자 자연어 질의의 정확성 연구

Natural Language Queries for Music Information Retrieval

정보관리학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2008, v.25 no.4, pp.149-164
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.149
이진하 (University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign)

Abstract

Our limited understanding of real-life music information queries is an impediment to developing music information retrieval (MIR) systems that meet the needs of real users. This study aims to contribute to developing a theorized understanding of how people seek music information by an empirical investigation of real-life queries, in particular, focusing on the accuracy of user-provided information and users' uncertainty expressions. This study found that much of users' information is inaccurate; users made various syntactic and semantic errors in providing this information. Despite these inaccuracies and uncertainties, many queries were successful in eliciting correct answers. A theory from pragmatics is suggested as a partial explanation for the unexpected success of inaccurate queries.

keywords
music information retrieval, natural language queries, accuracy, music information retrieval, natural language queries, accuracy, 음악정보 검색, 자연어 질의, 정확성

참고문헌

1.

Allen,B. (1989). Recall cues in known-item retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(4), 246-252.

2.

Baker, S. L. (1991). The measurement and evaluation of library services (2nd ed.):Information Resources Press.

3.

Bainbridge, D. (2003). How people describe their music information needs: a grounded theory analysis of music queries (221-222). Proc. of ISMIR (International Society of Music Informa- tion Retrieval). International Society of Music Informa- tion Retrieval.

4.

Birner,B.J. (1991). Discourse entities and the referential/ attributive distinction (-). Paper presented at the 65th Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.

5.

Blair,D.C. (2003). Information retrieval and the philosophy of language. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 3-50.

6.

Byrd, D. (2002). Problems of music information retrieval in the real world. Information Processing and Management, 38(2), 249-271.

7.

Cunningham, S. J. (2003). An ethnographic study of music information seeking: implications for the design of a music digital library (5-16). Proc. of JCDL 2003.

8.

Donnellan,K.S. (1966). Reference and Definite Descriptions. Philosophical Review, 75, 281-304.

9.

Downie,J.S. (1994). The Musifind musical information retrieval project, phase ii: user assessment survey (149-166). Proc. of the 22nd Annual Conf. of the CAIS.

10.

Downie, J. S. (2002). Toward a theory of music information retrieval queries: system design implications (299-300). Proc. of ISMIR 2002.

11.

Dwyer, C. M. (1991). Known- item search failure in an OPAC. RQ, 31(2), 228-236.

12.

Futrelle, J. (2002). Interdis- ciplinary research issues in music information retrieval: ISMIR 2000-2002. Journal of New Music Research, 32(2), 121-131.

13.

Grice,H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol.3):Seminar Press.

14.

Itoh, M. (2000). Subject search for music: quantitative analysis of access point selection (-). Proc. of ISMIR 2000.

15.

Jackson, S. L. (1958). Catalog use study: director's report:ALA.

16.

Katz, B. (2003). Digital reference: an over- view. The Reference Librarian, 79-80, 1-17.

17.

Kim, J. Y. (2002). Categories of music description and search terms and phrases used by non-music experts (209-214). Proc. of ISMIR 2002.

18.

Kronfeld,A. (1986). Donnellan's distinction and a computational model of reference (185-191). Proc. of the 24th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.

19.

Lancaster,F.W. (1998). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2nd ed.):University of Illinois.

20.

Laplante, A. (2006). Everyday life music information-seeking behaviour of young adults (381-382). Proc. of ISMIR 2006.

21.

Lee,J.H. (2008). Analysis of information features in natural language queries for music information retrieval: use patterns and accuracy:University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

22.

Lee, J. H. (2004). Survey of music information needs, uses, and seeking behaviours: preliminary findings (441-446). Proc. of ISMIR 2004.

23.

Lee, J. H. (2005). Challenges in cross-cultural/ multilingual music information seeking (1-7). Proc. of ISMIR 2005.

24.

Lee, J. H. (2005). Q&A websites: rich research resources for contextualizing information retrieval behaviors. Proc. of the ACM SIGIR 2005 Workshop on Info. Retrieval in Context, , 33-36.

25.

Lee, J. H. (2007). How incorrect information delivers correct search results: a pragmatic analysis of queries. Proc. of the 70th ASIS&T Annual Meeting. Mil- waukee, , -.

26.

Lee, Y. J. (2006). A user study on information searching behaviors for designing user-centered query interface of content-based music information retrieval system. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 23(2), 5-19.

27.

Lewis,D.W. (1987). Research on the use of online catalogs and its implications for library practice. Journal of Academic Librarian- ship, 13(3), 152-156.

28.

McPherson, J. R. (2001). Usage of the MELDEX digital music library (19-20). Proc. of ISMIR 2001.

29.

Ng,K.B. (2002). The applicability of universal pragmatics in IR interaction: a pilot study. Information Processing and Management, 38, 237-248.

30.

Onishi, K. H. (2002). Discourse model representation of referential and attributive descriptions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 97-123.

31.

Swanson,D.R. (1972). Requirements study for future catalogs. Final report to the National Science Foundation. Chicago: The University.

32.

Taheri-Panah, S. (2004). Music information retrieval systems: why do individuals use them and what are their needs? (455-460). Proc. of ISMIR 2004.

33.

University of Chicago. Graduate Library School. (1968). Requirements study for future catalogs. Progress report no. 2. University of Chicago. Graduate Library School.

정보관리학회지