- P-ISSN1013-0799
- E-ISSN2586-2073
- KCI
Development of an Economic Valuation Methodology and Model for the DDS of Foreign Journals
Abstract
This study is to develope a user-based economic valuation methodology and model for the economic analysis on the DDS of foreign journals. For this study, the sampling data on the annual subscribed journals by K institution was used and the online questionnaire was used to collect data. There are three aspects of the economic value of DDS journals was classified as use value, non-use value, and expectancy value. We suggested the income and market approach to measure its economic use value. To estimate the its value by individual users, this study applied a contingent valuation method and designed the imaginary scenarios.
- keywords
- 학술지 가치, 경제성 분석, 사용가치, 비사용가치, 기대가치, journal value, economic analysis, use value, non-use value, expectancy value
Reference
김영기. (2007). 웹 사이트의 신뢰성 평가에 영향을 미치는 요인과 각 요인의 중요도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(4), 93-111.
김영기. (2007). 이용자들의 웹 사이트 신뢰성 평가 방법에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 38(3), 53-72.
김영기. (2006). 지식트러스트 센터(Knowledge Trust Center) 구축, in: 유비쿼터스 사회의 지식, 참여, 그리고 생활. 한국정보문화진흥원.
최학열. (2008). 디지털 자료를 장기 보존하기 위한 국제표준. ITFIND 주간기술동향, 1270, -.
American Library Association. (1992). Re- ference Collection Development and Evaluation Committee, in: Reference Collection Development: a manual:American Library association, Reference and Adult Services Di- vision.
Barker, Joe. Evaluating Web Pages: Tech- niques to Apply & Questions to Ask (UC Berkeley - Teaching Library In- ternet Workshops). http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Evaluate.html.
Bell, Colleen. Critical Evaluation of Informa- tion Sources. http://libweb.uoregon.edu/guides/findarticles/credibility.html.
Benoy,J.W. (1982). The credibility of phys- ically attractive communicators: A review. Journal of Advertising, 11(3), 15-24.
Berkeley. How Much Information 2000/ 2003. http://www2.sims.berkeley.edu/research/projects/how-much-info-2003/.
Berscheid, E. (1981). A review of the psy- chological effects of physical attrac- tiveness, in: Psycho- logical Aspects of Facial Form:Center for Human Growth.
Berscheid, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. Ad- vances in Experimental Social Psy- chology, 7, 157-215.
Cheskin Research & Studio Archetype Sapi- ent. (1999). E-commerce Trust Study. http://cheskin.com/think/trust/assets/images/etrust.pdf.
Cheskin Research. (2000). Trust in the Wired Americas. http://cheskin.com/think/studies/trustIIrpt.pdf.
Cockburn, A.. (2001). What do web users do? An empirical anal- ysis of web use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54(6), 903-922.
Dion, K. K. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 24, 285-290.
Eagly, A. H. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but ...: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128.
Egger, F. N. (2000). Trust Me, I'm an Online Vendor: Towards a Model of Trust for E-Commerce System Design (101-102). CHI 2000 Extended Abstracts: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague(NL). ACM Press.
Expert Choice Korea. Expert Choice. http://www.expertchoice.co.kr.
Finberg, H. (2001). Digital Journalism Credibility Study. www.journalists.org/Programs/credibility_study.pdf.
Fogg, B. J. (2008). The Ele- ments of Computer Credibility (80-87). Pro- ceedings of ACM CHI 99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Fogg, B. J. (2002). Prominence-Interpretation Theory: Explaining How People Assess Credibility. A Research Report by the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab. www.captology.stanford.edu/PIT.html.
Fogg, B. J. (2002). Stanford Guidelines for Web Credibility. A Research Summary from the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab. www.webcredibility.org/guidelines.
Fogg, B. J. (2007). Stanford-Makovsky Web Cred- ibility Study 2002: Investigating what makes Web sites credible today, in: A Research Report by the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab in collab- oration with Makvosky & Company. Stanford University.
Fogg, B. J. (2002). Interactive Technology and Persuasion, in: The Persuasion Handbook: Develop- ments in Theory and Practice:Sage.
Fogg, B. J. (2000). Elements that Affect Web Credibility: Early Results from a Self-Report Study (295-296). Pro- ceedings of ACM CHI 2000 Con- ference on Human Factors in Com- puting Systems. New York: ACM Press. Extended Abstracts. ACM Press.
Gatignon, H. (1991). Innovative Decision Processes, in: Handbook of Consumer Behavior:Prentice-Hall.
김석영. (2001). 과학기술분야 해외 학술지의 비용대 효과 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 35(1), 249-264.
김희섭. (2005). 온라인 정보의 경제적 가치 평가 모델 개발 및 적용. 정보관리학회지, 22(2), 165-184.
류희경. (2006). 국내단행본 원문정보서비스의 경제적 가치 측정에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(4), 111-128.
정용일. (2005). 정보분석 보고서의 이용자 만족도 및 경제적 가치평가 측정에 관한 연구. 정보관리연구, 36(3), 167-180.
표순희. (2006). 공공도서관 경제적 가치 측정에 관한 연구- 대출 서비스를 중심으로 -. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(2), 243-262.
한윤환. (2006). 기술정보의 경제적 가치: 조건부 가치평가법의 응용. 정보관리학회지, 17(2), 7-18.
현병환. (1998). 기술의 경제성 분석이론과 실제Ⅱ:정보통신연구관리단.
ARL Statistics 2005-06[cited 2008.10]. http://wwww.arl.org/bm~doc/monser 06.pdf.
Barron, D. B. The Economic Impact of Public Libraries in South Carolina, SCEIS, Atlanta, GA. http://www.libsci.sc.edu/SCEIS/ home.htm.
Carrico, Steven B. (1997). The Cost-Effective- ness of Serial Exchanges at The Univer- sity of Florida Library. Serials Review, 23(1), 23-31.
Chrzastowski, Tina E. (1997). Chemistry Journal Use and Cost: Results of a Longitudinal Study. LRTS, 41(2), 101-111.
Cooper, Michael D. (1994). Using Aticle Photocopy Data in Bibliographic Models for Journal Collec- tion Management. Library Quarterly, 64(4), 386-413.
Fernández-Cano, Antonio. (2004). Reconsider- ing Price's Model of Scientific Growth: An Overview. Scientometrics, 61(3), 301-321.
Floridi,Luciano. (2002). On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infos- phere. Ethics and Information Technol- ogy, 4, 287-304.
Gyeszly,Suzanne D.. (2001). Electronic Paper Journals? Budgetary, Collection Develop- ment, and User Satisfaction Questions. Collection Building, 20(1), 5-10.
Hasslow, Rolf. (1995). Deselection of Serials: The Chalmers University of Technology Library Me- thod. Collection Management, 19(3), 151-170.
Glen E. Holt. (2002). Cost Benefit Analysis: A Summary of The Methodology. The Bottom Line: Man- aging Library Finances, 15(4), 154-158.
Johnson,Qiana. (2004). User Preferences in Formats of Print and Electronic Journals. Collection Building, 23(2), 73-77.
King, Donald W. (2003). Library Economic Metrics: Examples of the Comparison of Electronic and Print Journal Collections and Collection Ser- vices. Library Trends, 51(3), 376-498.
Kingma,B.R. (2001). The Economics of Information: A Guide to Economic and Cost-Benefit Analysis for Information Professionals, 2nd ed:Englewood Col- orado/Libraries Unlimited, Inc..
Pung, Caroline. (2004). Measuring The Economic Impact of the British Library. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 10(1), 79-102.
Repo,A.J. (1989). The Value of Information: Approaches in Economics, Accounting and Management Science. JASIS, 48(6), 68-85.
St. Louis Public Library. Public Library Benefits Valuation Study. http://www.slpl.lib.mo.us/using/htm.
Scigliano, Marisa. (2000). Serial Use in a Small Academic Library: Determining Cost- Effectivness. Serials Review, 26(1), 43-52.
Whitehall, Tom. (1995). Value in Library and Information Management: A Review. Library Management, 16(4), 3-11.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations