바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.25 No.4

Citation Share

A Study on the Convenience in Finding Books According to Classifications: Focused on the Classifications in Public Libraries and Bookstores

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2008, v.25 no.4, pp.25-42
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.025


& (2008). A Study on the Convenience in Finding Books According to Classifications: Focused on the Classifications in Public Libraries and Bookstores. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(4), 25-42, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.4.025

Abstract

The research was conducted to investigate factors that facilitate users’ finding books by analyzing classifications in public library and bookstore. This research was based on the assumption that the users’ needs and information behaviors are similar in both public library and bookstore. The main purpose of this study is not to recommend classifying public library collections the way a bookstore does, but to figure out what makes the users’ book finding more convenient by analyzing the classifications. To carry out the research, users’ book finding in public library and classifications of public library and bookstore are analyzed. Then, a survey was conducted to investigate users’ book finding behaviors, degree of convenience in finding books according to different classifications and the causes of the convenience. The results of the research showed that bookstore’s classification was more convenient for the users in finding books.

keywords
classification, finding books, public library, bookstore, book finding behaviors, 분류방식, 도서탐색, 공공도서관, 대형서점, 탐색행태, 탐색용이성, classification, finding books, public library, bookstore, book finding behaviors

Reference

1.

곽철완. (2005). 공공도서관 공간구성에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 36(3), 149-167.

2.

김태수. (2000). 분류의 이해:문헌정보처리연구회.

3.

오동근. (2002). KDC의 이해:태일사.

4.

윤희윤. (2005). 정보자료분류론:태일사.

5.

이종성. (2007). 사회과학 연구를 위한 통계방법:박영사.

6.

임종원. (2001). 마케팅조사방법론:법문사.

7.

정연경. (2001). 인터넷 서점의 주제별 분류체계 설계에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 35(3), 17-34.

8.

조경환. (1993). 서울북맵: 서점 도서관 완벽가이드:진선출판사.

9.

최정태. (1998). 문헌분류의 이론과 실제:부산대학교출판부.

10.

한국도서관협회. (1998). 한국십진분류법해설:한국도서관협회.

11.

한국서점조합연합회. (2006). 한국서점편람:한국서점조합연합회.

12.

Agosto,D. (2006). Journal of American Society for Information Sci- ence and Technology. 57(4), 585-586.

13.

Baker, S. (1998). Fiction classification schemes: the principles behind them and their success. Re- ference Quarterly, 27(2), 245-251.

14.

Boter, J. (2005). User catego- rization of public library collections. Library and Information Science Re- search, 27, 190-202.

15.

Chernik,B. (1992). Introduction to Library Services:Libraries Unlimited.

16.

Coffman,S. (1998). What if you ran your library like a bookstore?. American Libraries, 29(3), 40-44.

17.

Evans, E. (2005). Developing Library and Information Center Collect- ions:Libraries Unlimited.

18.

Green, S. (2007). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh:Prentice Hall.

19.

Katz,A. (2002). Introduction to Reference Work, Volumes II:Mc- Graw Hill.

20.

Leckie, G. (2002). The public place of central libraries: findings from Toronto and Vancouver. Library Qua- rterly, 72(3), 326-372.

21.

Leckie, G. (2005). Understand- ing Information Seeking: The Public Library Context, in: Advances in Librarian- ship:Elsevier.

22.

Lynch, S. (2007). Dewey? at this Library with a very different outlook, they don’t. New York Times, , -.

23.

Raymond,J. (1998). Librarians have little to fear from bookstores. Library Journal, 123(15), 41-42.

24.

Sapiie,J. (1995). Reader‐interest classification: the user friendly schemes. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 19(3-4), 143-155.

25.

Sawbridge, L. (1982). The mechanics and the magic of declassi- fication. Library Association Record, 84(11), 385-386.

26.

Shimpock Vieweg, K. (1992). How to develop a marketing plan for a law firm library. Law Library Journal, 84, 67-91.

27.

Siess,J. (2003). The visible librarian: asserting your value with marketing and advo- cacy:American Library Asso- ciation.

28.

Shore,M. (2007). Gilbert library to be first to drop Dewey Decimal. The Arizona Republic, 30, -.

29.

Smith,I. (1999). What do we know about public library use?. Aslib Proceedings, 51(9), 302-314.

30.

Steffen, N. (2002). Who is doing what?: Outcome‐based evalua- tion and demographics in the counting on results project. Public Libraries, 41(5), 271-279.

31.

Sykes,A. (1982). Categorization. Library Association Record, 84(11), 383-384.

32.

Vavrek,B. (2000). Is the American public library part of everyone's life?. Amer- ican Libraries, 31(1), 60-64.

33.

Woodward,J. (2005). Creating the Customer‐driven Library: Building on the book- store model:American Library Association.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy