The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of information resources of the humanities scholars in Korea and suggest the strategic planning of academic library and information services to serve their needs. To collect data, a mail survey was conducted during the period of November 2007 through January 2008. Out of 799 humanities scholars sampled from 25 universities, 132 responded with the completion rate of 16%. Major findings in this study are as follows: First, the majority of the humanities scholars distribute their time equally to research and education, and conduct independent research. Second, they still largely depend on print resources, including scholarly journals, books, and manuscripts for getting information, while using some online information resource mostly in text such as electronic documents and journals. They expect that the frequency of using such print resources would not decline much, but the use of online resources could definitely increase in the next five years. Some variances in the behavior were observed among the groups of scholars according to their research experiences. It is suggested that academic libraries (1) conduct more active outreach, (2) prioritize between traditional and electronic resources, (3) plan information literacy education for traditional resources.
Abbott, Andrew. (2006). The University Library. http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/staffweb/groups/space/abbott-report.html.
Barrett, Andy. (2005). The Information-Seeking Habits of Graduate Student Resear- chers in the Humanities. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(4), 324-331.
Bates, Marcia J. (1996). Information Needs and Seeking of Scholars and Artists in Relation to Multimedia Materials. http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/scholars.html.
Brockman, William S. (2001). Scholarly Work in the Humanities and the Evolving Informa-tion Environment. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub104.
Bevilacqua, Fabrizia. (2005). Organizing E- Journals from the Point of View of Humanities: A Case Study at the University of Parma. New Library World, 106(1216), 416-429.
Case, Donald O. (2003). Looking for Informa-tion: A Survey of Research on Infor- mation Seeking, Needs, and Behavior:Academic Press.
Cobbledick, Susie. (1996). The Information See- king Behavior of Artists: Exploratory Interviews. Library Quarterly, 66(4), 343-372.
de Tiratel,Susana Romanos. (2000). Accessing Information Use by Humanists and Social Scientists: A Study at the Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argen- tina. Journal of Academic Librarian- ship, 26(5), 346-354.
East, John W. (2005). Information Literacy for the Humanities Researcher: A Syllabus Based on Information Habits Research. Journal of Academic Libra-rianship, 31(2), 134-142.
(2002). Researchers’ Use of Li- braries and Other Information Sources: Current Patterns and Future Trends: Final Report. http://www.rslg.ac.uk/research/libuse/LUrep1.doc.
Evans, G. Edward. (2000). Developing Library and Information Center Collections:Libraries Unlimited.
Friedlander, Amy. (2002). Dimensions and Use of the Scholarly Information Environment. http://www.clir.org/pub/reports/pub110.
Gardiner, Donna. (2006). Snapshot of Information Use Patterns of Aca- demics in British Universities. Online Information Review, 30(4), 341-359.
Herman, Eti. (2004). Research in Progress: Some Preliminary and Key Insights into the Information Needs of the Con- temporary Academic Researcher. Part 1. Aslib Proceedings, 56(1), 34-47.
Herman, Eti. (2004). Research in Progress. Part 2 -- Some Preliminary and Key Insights into the Information Needs of the Contemporary Academic Researcher. Part 1. Aslib Proceedings, 56(2), 118-131.
Hughes, Carol Ann. (2001). Use of Electronic Monographs in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Library Hi Tech, 19(4), 368-375.
Maron, Nancy L. (2008). Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication: Results of an Investigation Conducted by Ithaka for the Association of Research Li- braries. http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/current-models-report.pdf.
OCLC. (2003). The 2003 OCLC Environmental Scan: Pattern Recognition: Exucutive Summary. http://www.oclc.org/reports/escan/downloads/escansummary.
Pankake, Marcia. (1991). Humanities Research in the 90s: What Scholars Need; What Libarians Can Do. Library Hi Tech, 9(1), 9-15.
Research Information Network. (2006). Researchers and Discovery Ser- vices: Behaviour, Perceptions and Needs. A Study Commissioned by the Research Information Network. http://www.rin.ac.uk/files/Reportfinal.pdf.
Talja, Sanna. (2003). Re-asons for the Use and Non-Use of Electronic Journals and Databases: A Domain Analytic Study in Four Sc- holarly Disciplines. Journal of Docu-mentation, 59(6), 673-691.
Talja, Sanna. (2003). Information Sharing in Academic Communities: Types and Levels of Collaboration in Information Seeking and Use. New Review of Information Behavior Research, 3, 143-160.
Tenopir, Carol. (2003). Use and Users of Elec- tronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub120.
Troll, A. Denise. Changes in Usage, Usability, and Use Support. http://www.libqual.org/documents/admin/troll.pdf.
Troll, A. Denise. (2001). How and Why Li- braries Are Changing?. http://www.diglib.org/use/whitepaper.htm.
Wiberley, Jr. Stephen E. (1991). Habits of Humanists: Scholarly Behavior and New Information Technologies. Library Hi Tech, 9(1), 17-21.
Wiberley, Jr. Stephen E. (1989). Patterns of Information Seeking in the Humanities. College & Research Libraries, 50, 638-645.
Wiberley, Jr. Stephen E. (1994). Humanists Revisited: A Longitudinal Look at the Adoption of Information Technology. College & Research Libraries, 55, 499-509.
Wiberley, Jr. Stephen E. (2000). Time and Technology: A Decade Long Look at Humanists’ Use of Electronic Information Technology. College & Research Libraries, 61(5), 421-431.