바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.26 No.3

Citation Share

A Study on the Structural Relationships between the Antecedents of Knowledge Management and Performance in Public Enterprise: Focus on the KORAIL

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2009, v.26 no.3, pp.189-211
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.3.189

(2009). A Study on the Structural Relationships between the Antecedents of Knowledge Management and Performance in Public Enterprise: Focus on the KORAIL. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 26(3), 189-211, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.3.189

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the causal relationships among knowledge management(KM) influence factors(leadership, learning culture, member' attitude, reward, knowledge quality, KMS quality), KM activities(knowledge creation, knowledge sharing), KM performance in public enterprise. The results of data analysis by structured equation model(SEM) indicate that learning culture, knowledge quality and KMS quality significantly influence the knowledge creation and sharing. Member' attitude has significant influences on the knowledge creation. And knowledge creation and sharing have a significant affect on KM performance. Based on the results, the potential implications of the strategy for effective knowledge management are discussed.

keywords
knowledge management(KM), knowledge creation, knowledge sharing, KM performance, knowledge management(KM), knowledge creation, knowledge sharing, KM performance, 지식관리, 지식창출, 지식공유, 지식관리 성과

Reference

1.

김경규. (2005). 지식공유 의도와 지식관리시스템의 사용. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 65-90.

2.

김계수. (2004). AMOS 구조방정식 모형분석:SPSS 아카데미.

3.

김호열. (2007). 지식경영 기반구조와 지식관리시스템의 프로세스 역량이 기업성과에 미치는 영향. 경영학연구, 36(2), 257-296.

4.

남궁근. (2001). 행정조사방법론:법문사.

5.

민재형. (2004). 지식경영의 역량, 활동, 성과에 관한 실증연구. 고객만족경영연구, 6(1), 123-156.

6.

박문수. (2001). 지식공유의 영향요인: 연구동향과 과제. 지식경영연구, 2(1), 1-23.

7.

박희서. (2001). 지방공무원들의 효율적 지식관리를 위한 인과모형 검증. 한국정책학회보, 10(2), 111-133.

8.

배귀희. (2005). 자원기반이론 관점에서의 지식관리에 대한 소고. 행정포커스, , 36-43.

9.

신선진. (2008). 지식관리시스템에서의 지식공유에 대한 영향요인과 성과 간의 구조적 관계에 관한 연구. 지식경영연구, 9(2), 87-107.

10.

이건창. (2002). KMPI: 지식경영 성과지표의 실증적 분석에 관한 연구 -코스닥(KOSDAQ)에 상장된 벤쳐기업을 중심으로-. 경영학연구, 31(3), 1-601.

11.

이건창. (2002). 기업내 개인차원에서의 지식순화과정과 지식경영 효율성간의 관계에 관한 연구. 지식경영연구, 3(2), 31-48.

12.

이봉규. (2006). 지식경영의 성공요인：공기업 사례. 한국경영과학회지, 31(4), 89-103.

13.

이홍재. (2004). 지식관리와 정부성과간의 관계에 관한 실증적 연구.

14.

이홍재. (2006). 지식관리 활동과 업무성과에 관한 실증연구: 구조방정식 모형 접근. 한국행정학보, 40(3), 105-127.

15.

이홍재. (2007). 평가 및 보상이 지식창출과 공유 활동에 미치는 영향 - 중앙행정기관을 중심으로 -. 정보관리학회지, 24(1), 55-74.

16.

이홍재. (2009). 공공부문의 지식관리에 관한 연구 :KM 기반요인, KM 활동, KM 성과 간의 구조적 관계를 중심으로. 한국행정연구, 18(1), 97-130.

17.

장영철. (2008). 코레일 지식경영 활성화 사례. 지식경영연구, 9(4), 157-178.

18.

정동섭. (2002). 지식공유의 영향요인과 지식공유가 조직몰입에 미치는 영향. 정보화정책, 9(4), 49-67.

19.

채서일. (1990). 사회조사방법론:법문사.

20.

하미승. (2005). 공공부문에 있어서의 지식창출의 결정요인에 관한 연구 : 공기업을 중심으로. 한국행정연구, 14(2), 259-296.

21.

한세억. (2001). 행정지식관리시스템의 이해와 접근: 행정정보시스템의 진화가능성 모색. 한국행정연구, 10(2), 228-259.

22.

Alavi, M. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management System: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.

23.

Alavi, M. (2002). Knowledge Management System: Issues, Challenges and Benefits in Knowledge Management Systems:Thomson Learning.

24.

Belkis, Leong-Hong. (2001). Critical Success Factors in Implementing Knowledge Management in Building Knowledge Management Environments for Electronic Government:Management Concepts.

25.

Chan, I. (2005). Getting Knowledge Management Right: Les- sons from Failure. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(3), 40-54.

26.

Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge Management, Innovation and Firm Performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 101-115.

27.

Davenport, T. H. (1998). Successful Knowledge Man- agement Project. Sloan Management Review, 37(Winter), 43-57.

28.

DeLone, W. H. (1992). Information System Success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.

29.

del-Rey-Chamorro, F. M. (2003). A Framework to Create Key Performance Indicators for Knowledge Management Solutions. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(2), 46-62.

30.

Gold, A. (2001). Knowledge Management: An Organ- izational Capabilities Perspectives. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.

31.

Gooijer, J. (2000). Designing a Knowledge Management Performance Framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(4), 303-310.

32.

Holsapple, C. W. (2003). A Knowledge Management Ontology in Handbook on Knowledge Management:Springer.

33.

Ichijo, K. (2007). Introduction: Knowledge as Competitive Advantage in the Age of Increasing Globalization in Knowledge Creation and Management:Oxford University Press.

34.

Jennex, M. E. (2006). A Model of Knowledge Management Success. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(3), 51-68.

35.

Kalling, T. (2003). Knowledge Management and the Occasional Links with Per- formance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(3), 67-81.

36.

Kankanhalli, A. (2005). Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113-143.

37.

Kogut, B. (1992). Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.

38.

Krogh, G. V. (2000). Enabling Knowledge Creation:Oxford University Press.

39.

Krogh, G. V. (2001). Making the most of your Company's Knowledge: a Strategic Framework. Long Range Planning, 34, 421-439.

40.

Kusunoki, K. (1998). Organizational Capabilities in Product Development of Japanese Firms: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical. Organization Science, 9(6), 699-718.

41.

Lam, W. (2005). Knowledge Man- agement Project Abandonment: An explanatory examination of root cause. Communications of Association for Information System, 16, 723-743.

42.

Lee, H. (2003). Knowledge Man- agement Enablers, Process, and Organizational Performance: An Inte- grative View and Empirical Examination. Journal of Management Infor- mation System, 20(1), 179-228.

43.

Liu, Shih-Chen. (2007). Knowledge Management Success: Empirical Assessment of Theoretical Model in Knowledge Management in Modern Organizations:Idea Group.

44.

Maier, R. (2002). Knowledge Management Systems: Information and Communication Technology for Knowledge Management:Springer-Verlag.

45.

McDermott, R. (2001). Over- coming Cultural Barriers to Sharing Knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 76-85.

46.

McElroy, M. W. (2003). The New Knowledge Management: Complexity, Learning, and Sustainable Innovation:Butterworth Heinemann.

47.

McNabb, David E. (2007). Knowledge Management in the Public Sector:M.E.Sharpe.

48.

Natarajan, G. (2001). Knowledge Management: Enabling Business Growth:McGraw-Hill.

49.

O'Dell, C. (1998). If only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practice. California Management Review, 40(3), 154-174.

50.

Oldham, G. R. (1996). Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.

51.

Pedhazur, E. J. (1991). Measurement, Design and Analysis: An Integrated Approach:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

52.

Ruggles, R. (1998). The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice. California Management Review, 40(3), 80-89.

53.

Simonin, B. (1997). The Importance of Colla- borative Know-How: An Empirical Test of the Learning Organization. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 509-533.

54.

Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring Internal Stick- iness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter), 27-44.

55.

Wang, Yi-Shun. (2008). Assessing e-Government Systems Suc- cess: A validation of the DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 717-733.

56.

Zaim, H. (2007). Performance of Knowledge Manage- ment Practices: A Causal Analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(6), 54-67.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy