바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

도서관 E-Service 품질에 대한 소비자인식 결정요인에 대한 연구: Zeithaml과 Bitner모형을 중심으로

A Study on the Customer Perceptions of Service Quality for Library E-Service: Based on Zeithaml & Bitner's Model

정보관리학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2010, v.27 no.1, pp.119-136
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.119
이성신 (경북대학교)

초록

본 연구는 Zeithaml과 Bitner모형을 도서관 E-Service품질 연구를 위해 수정 제안하고자 하는데 그 목적이 있다. 연구 목적을 달성하기 위해 문헌조사방법을 사용하였으며 연구결과 ‘환경적 품질’이 도서관 E-Service품질에 대한 소비자인식을 결정하는데 있어서 가장 중요한 요소임이 밝혀졌다. 이와 더불어 기존의 E-Service 관련연구와 사용성연구와의 비교 분석을 통해 도서관 E-Service를 위한 ‘환경적 품질’의 하부차원들을 제시하였다. 도서관 E-Service의 ‘환경적 품질’에 영향을 미치는 요소로서는 ‘기술적 요소에 대한 개인적 인식’과 ‘과거의 유사서비스 사용경험’이 중요한 것으로 나타났다.

keywords
library E-Service, physical quality, service quality, customer perceptions, 도서관 E-Service, 환경적 품질, 서비스 품질, 소비자 인식, library E-Service, physical quality, service quality, customer perceptions

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to suggest a revised model for library e-service quality research based on Zeithaml & Bitner's model. To achieve this purpose, this study reviews the previous literature related to the study of service quality and e-service. According to the study results, ‘physical quality’ is the most important factor which influences on the customer perceptions of library e-service quality. Furthermore, this study suggests eight service quality dimensions of ‘physical quality’ for library e-service. In addition, customer's personal factors and previous experiences with similar services can be regarded as important factors which influence on the ‘physical quality’ of library e-service.

keywords
library E-Service, physical quality, service quality, customer perceptions, 도서관 E-Service, 환경적 품질, 서비스 품질, 소비자 인식, library E-Service, physical quality, service quality, customer perceptions

참고문헌

1.

강회일. (2002). 도서관의 온라인 서비스 품질평가: e-LibQual의 적용. 정보관리학회지, 19(3), 12-261.

2.

오동근. (2009). 이용자가 인식하는 공공도서관 서비스품질 결정요인 분석. 정보관리연구, 40(2), 47-70.

3.

이응봉. (2003). 디지털도서관 웹사이트 사용성 평가기준 개발에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 20(3), 129-154.

4.

장윤금. (2007). 공공도서관의 e-서비스 품질평가와 이용자 만족도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(4), 315-329.

5.

홍현진. (2005). 도서관의 정보서비스 품질평가 연구에 관한 고찰. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 36(2), 93-120.

6.

황 재 영. (2007). 디지털도서관의 e-서비스품질 평가에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(3), 55-79.

7.

Burgess, Lois. A Conceptual framework for understanding and measuring perceived service quality in net-based customer support systems. http://www.collecter.org/archives/2004_October/14.pdf.

8.

Collier, Joel.. (2009). Model misspecification: Contrasting formative and reflective indicators for a model of E-Service quality. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(3), 283-293.

9.

Cristobal, Eduard.. (2007). Perceived e-service quality (PeSQ). Managing Service Quality, 17(3), 317-340.

10.

Froehle, Craig. (2004). New measurement scales for evaluating perceptions of the technology-mediated customer service experience. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 1-21.

11.

Gurau, Calin. (2003). Tailoring e-service quality through CRM. Managing Service Quality, 13(6), 520-531.

12.

Hernon, Peter. (2005). EService quality in libraries: Exploring its features and dimensions. Library & Information Science Research, 27(3), 377-404.

13.

Lee, Jungki. (2002). Effects of personal control on adoption of self-service technology innovations. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6), 553-572.

14.

Lee, Seongsin. (2008). Academic Library Service Consumer(User) Motivation Study Based on Expectancy Theory.

15.

Oyedele, Adesegun. (2007). An empirical investigation of consumer control factors on intention to use selected self-service technologies. International Journal of Service, 18(3), 287-306.

16.

Rowley, Jennifer. (2006). An analysis of the e-service literature: towards a research agenda. Internet Research, 16(3), 339-359.

17.

Sahadev, Sunil. (2008). Modeling the consequences of e-service quality. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26(6), 605-620.

18.

Santos, Fessica. (2003). E-service quality: a model of virtual service quality dimensions. Managing Service Quality, 13(3), 233-246.

19.

Voss, Christopher. (2003). Rethinking paradigms of service-servicein a virtual environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(1), 88-104.

20.

Walker, Rhett. (2006). Why consumers use and do not use technology-enabled services. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(2), 125-135.

21.

Zeithaml, Valarie. (2002). Service excellence in electronic channels. Managing Service Quality, 12(3), 135-138.

22.

Zeithaml, Valarie. (2003). Services Marketing:McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

23.

Zeithaml, Valarie.. (2002). A conceptual framework for understanding e-service quality: implications for future research and managerial practice. .

정보관리학회지