본 연구는 Zeithaml과 Bitner모형을 도서관 E-Service품질 연구를 위해 수정 제안하고자 하는데 그 목적이 있다. 연구 목적을 달성하기 위해 문헌조사방법을 사용하였으며 연구결과 ‘환경적 품질’이 도서관 E-Service품질에 대한 소비자인식을 결정하는데 있어서 가장 중요한 요소임이 밝혀졌다. 이와 더불어 기존의 E-Service 관련연구와 사용성연구와의 비교 분석을 통해 도서관 E-Service를 위한 ‘환경적 품질’의 하부차원들을 제시하였다. 도서관 E-Service의 ‘환경적 품질’에 영향을 미치는 요소로서는 ‘기술적 요소에 대한 개인적 인식’과 ‘과거의 유사서비스 사용경험’이 중요한 것으로 나타났다.
The purpose of this study is to suggest a revised model for library e-service quality research based on Zeithaml & Bitner's model. To achieve this purpose, this study reviews the previous literature related to the study of service quality and e-service. According to the study results, ‘physical quality’ is the most important factor which influences on the customer perceptions of library e-service quality. Furthermore, this study suggests eight service quality dimensions of ‘physical quality’ for library e-service. In addition, customer's personal factors and previous experiences with similar services can be regarded as important factors which influence on the ‘physical quality’ of library e-service.
강회일. (2002). 도서관의 온라인 서비스 품질평가: e-LibQual의 적용. 정보관리학회지, 19(3), 12-261.
오동근. (2009). 이용자가 인식하는 공공도서관 서비스품질 결정요인 분석. 정보관리연구, 40(2), 47-70.
이응봉. (2003). 디지털도서관 웹사이트 사용성 평가기준 개발에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 20(3), 129-154.
장윤금. (2007). 공공도서관의 e-서비스 품질평가와 이용자 만족도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(4), 315-329.
홍현진. (2005). 도서관의 정보서비스 품질평가 연구에 관한 고찰. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 36(2), 93-120.
황 재 영. (2007). 디지털도서관의 e-서비스품질 평가에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(3), 55-79.
Burgess, Lois. A Conceptual framework for understanding and measuring perceived service quality in net-based customer support systems. http://www.collecter.org/archives/2004_October/14.pdf.
Collier, Joel.. (2009). Model misspecification: Contrasting formative and reflective indicators for a model of E-Service quality. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(3), 283-293.
Cristobal, Eduard.. (2007). Perceived e-service quality (PeSQ). Managing Service Quality, 17(3), 317-340.
Froehle, Craig. (2004). New measurement scales for evaluating perceptions of the technology-mediated customer service experience. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 1-21.
Gurau, Calin. (2003). Tailoring e-service quality through CRM. Managing Service Quality, 13(6), 520-531.
Hernon, Peter. (2005). EService quality in libraries: Exploring its features and dimensions. Library & Information Science Research, 27(3), 377-404.
Lee, Jungki. (2002). Effects of personal control on adoption of self-service technology innovations. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6), 553-572.
Lee, Seongsin. (2008). Academic Library Service Consumer(User) Motivation Study Based on Expectancy Theory.
Oyedele, Adesegun. (2007). An empirical investigation of consumer control factors on intention to use selected self-service technologies. International Journal of Service, 18(3), 287-306.
Rowley, Jennifer. (2006). An analysis of the e-service literature: towards a research agenda. Internet Research, 16(3), 339-359.
Sahadev, Sunil. (2008). Modeling the consequences of e-service quality. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26(6), 605-620.
Santos, Fessica. (2003). E-service quality: a model of virtual service quality dimensions. Managing Service Quality, 13(3), 233-246.
Voss, Christopher. (2003). Rethinking paradigms of service-servicein a virtual environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(1), 88-104.
Walker, Rhett. (2006). Why consumers use and do not use technology-enabled services. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(2), 125-135.
Zeithaml, Valarie. (2002). Service excellence in electronic channels. Managing Service Quality, 12(3), 135-138.
Zeithaml, Valarie. (2003). Services Marketing:McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Zeithaml, Valarie.. (2002). A conceptual framework for understanding e-service quality: implications for future research and managerial practice. .