바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.27 No.3

Citation Share

A Study on the Factors Affecting Knowledge Contribution in the Public Sector

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2010, v.27 no.3, pp.169-187
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.3.169


& (2010). A Study on the Factors Affecting Knowledge Contribution in the Public Sector. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(3), 169-187, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.3.169

Abstract

The purposes of this study are to find factors that have influences on the knowledge contribution activities, and to offer some suggestions to improve the knowledge contribution. Especially this study suggests to improve knowledge contribution by analyzing both on-line and off-line knowledge contribution activities in the public sector. The results of data analysis by structured equation model(SEM) indicate that leadership, intrinsic motivation, and knowledge quality significantly influence on-line and off-line knowledge contribution. Based on the results, the potential implications for the strategy of effective knowledge contribution are discussed.

keywords
지식기여, 지식관리, 지식공유, 지식관리시스템, knowledge contribution, knowledge management(KM), knowledge sharing, knowledge management system(KMS), knowledge contribution, knowledge management(KM), knowledge sharing, knowledge management system(KMS)

Reference

1.

김경규. (2005). 지식공유 의도와 지식관리시스템의 사용. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 65-90.

2.

김종애. (2009). 온라인 지식 커뮤니티에서의 지식기여 의도의 동기요인. 한국문헌정보학회지, 43(3), 297-312.

3.

김효근. (2001). 조직의 지식경영 준비도 측정도구 개발에 관한 연구. 지식경영연구, 2(1), 45-63.

4.

김효근. (2002). 조직구성원의 지식기여에 대한 평가 및 보상이 지식기여도에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 사례연구: 컨설팅 산업을 중심으로. 지식경영연구, 3(1), 75-92.

5.

나미자. (2004). 조직 구성원의 지식기여도 평가 도구 개발에 관한 연구. Information Systems Review, 6(2), 113-135.

6.

남궁근. (2009). 행정조사방법론:법문사.

7.

박문수. (2001). 지식공유의 영향요인: 연구동향과 과제. 지식경영연구, 2(1), 1-23.

8.

이건창. (2002). 기업내 개인차원에서의 지식순환과정과 지식경영 효율성간의 관계에 관한 연구. 지식경영연구, 3(2), 31-48.

9.

이현정. (2007). 지식 기여자의 지식기여도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구 (-). 한국경영학회 통합학술대회 발표논문.

10.

이홍재. (2009). 공공부문의 지식관리에 관한 연구 :KM 기반요인, KM 활동, KM 성과 간의 구조적 관계를 중심으로. 한국행정연구, 18(1), 97-130.

11.

이홍재. (2008). 지식관리시스템 사용자 만족도와 성과에 관한 연구: 재정경제부를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 25(4), 67-85.

12.

이홍재. (2009). 공기업의 지식관리 영향요인과 성과 간의 구조적 관계: 한국철도공사를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 26(3), 189-211.

13.

정재훤. (2009). 온라인 지식네트워크 내에서의 지식기여 및 지식활용 활동에 영향을 미치는 요인. 한국경영과학회지, 34(3), 1-27.

14.

Alavi, M.. (1999). Knowledge Management Systems: Emerging Views and Practices from the Field (-). Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

15.

Alavi, M.. (2001). Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management System: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.

16.

Barclay, D.. (1995). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Causal Modeling. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285-309.

17.

Bock, G. W.. (2005). Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Role of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-112.

18.

Davis, F. D.. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of User Acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

19.

Hansen, M. T.. (1999). What's your strategy for managing knowledge?. Harvard Business Review, 77, 106-116.

20.

Holsapple, C. W.. (2003). A Knowledge Management Ontology. in: Handbook on Knowledge Management:Springer.

21.

Jennex, M. E.. (2006). A Model of Knowledge Management Success. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(3), 51-68.

22.

Kankanhalli, A.. (2005). Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113-143.

23.

Maier, R.. (2002). Knowledge Management Systems: Information and Communication Technology for Knowledge Management:Springer-Verlag.

24.

McNabb, David E.. (2007). Knowledge Management in the Public Sector:M.E. Sharpe Inc.

25.

O'Dell, C.. (1998). If only We knew what we know: Identification and Transfer of internal Best Practice. California Management Review, 40(3), 154-174.

26.

Pedhazur, E. J.. (1991). Measurement, Design and Analysis: An Integrated Approach:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

27.

Roberts, K. H.. (1997). Failures in upward Communication in Organizations: Three Possible Culprits. Academy of Management Journal, 17(2), 205-215.

28.

Ruggles, R.. (1998). The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice. California Management Review, 40(3), 80-89.

29.

Watson, Sharon. (2006). A Multi Theoretical Model of Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Determinants of Knowledge Contribution and Knowledge Reuse. Journal of Management Studies, 43(2), 141-173.

30.

Szulanski, G.. (1996). Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-44.

31.

Wasko, Molly Mclure. (2005). Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.

32.

Wu, Jen-Her. (2006). Measuring KMS Success: A Respecification of the DeLone and McLean's Model. Information & Management, 43, 728-739.

33.

Yang, S.-B.. (2007). Interorganizational Knowledge Transfer in the Buyer-Supplier Relationship: A Buyer’s Perspective (-). Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Science. IEEE Computer Society Press.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy