This paper compares two recent methods for exploring a scientist's research history: citation identity and self-citation network. The former is proposed by White(2000), while the latter is suggested by Hellsten et al.(2007). An experimental citation analysis was carried out on the research output of Young Mee Chung, a renouned Korean information scientist. The result shows that the two methods divided the research period into two sub-periods in the same way. They also identified the major research themes very similarly. In the analysis of each method's performance in depth, the two methods revealed different functions to understand a researcher's history. Citation identity was useful to identify authors who have affected Chung's research in terms of research topics. whereas, self-citation network was successful to identify the core papers and leading papers of the research sub-periods. This study indicates the combination of two methods can provide rich information on a scientist's research history.
기지훈. (2011). 자기인용 네트워크 : 학자의 학문세계 분석에 대한 새로운 접근 (-). 제6회 COREN컨퍼런스 발표자료. 경희대학교.
이재윤. (2006). 지적 구조 분석을 위한 새로운 클러스터링 기법에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(4), 215-231.
이재윤. (2011). 인용 네트워크 분석에 근거한 문헌 인용 지수 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 45(2), 119-143.
이재윤. (2011). 계량서지적 기법을 활용한 LED 핵심 주제영역의 연구 동향 분석. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 42(3), 1-26.
이종욱. (2011). 교수연구업적 평가법의 계량적 분석: 국내 문헌정보학과 교수연구업적을 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 28(4), 119-140.
Barrat, A.. (2008). Dynamical processes on complex networks:Cambridge University Press.
Bonnevie-Nebelong, E.. (2006). Journal citation identity, journal citation image and internationalisation: Methods for journal evaluation. Scientometrics, 66(2), 411-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0029-9.
Davarpanah, M. R.. (2008). A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals : Productivity and characteristics. Scientometrics, 77(1), 21-39.
Fragkiadaki, E.. (2011). f-Value : Measuring an article's scientific impact. Scientometrics, 86(3), 671-686.
Franceschini, F.. (2011). Structured evaluation of the scientific output of academic research groups by recent h-based indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 64-74.
Glänzel, W.. (2006). A concise review on the role of author self-citations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy. Scientometrics, 67(2), 263-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/Scient.67.2006.2.8.
Hellsten, I.. (2007). Self-citations, co-authorships and keywords: A new approach to scientists' field mobility?. Scientometrics, 72(3), 469-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1680-5.
이재윤. (2011). Intellectual Structure and Infrastructure of Informetrics: Domain Analysis from 2001 to 2010. 정보관리학회지, 28(2), 11-36.
Nebelong-Bonnevie, E.. (2006). Journal citation identity and journal citation image: A portrait of the Journal of Documentation. Journal of Documentation, 62(1), 30-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220410610642039.
Schvaneveldt, R. W.. (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization:Ablex.
Tsay, Ming-yueh. (1998). A bibliometric analysis and comparison on three information science journals: JASIST, IPM, JOD, 1998-2008. Scientometrics, 89(2), 591-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0460-4.
White, H.. (2000). Toward ego-centered citation analysis, In The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield:Information Today, Inc.