This study pointed the factors affecting the number of articles and citations in material science which is the most active publishing disciplinary in South Korea. This was conducted by gathering the information on SCIE which had been published by 449 Korean professors in material science from 2006 to 2010. One of the results was that the professors who had published more papers received more citations than those who did not, reconfirming former studies abroad. It was observed that the factors majors impacting on the number of papers may be their academic positions, educational backgrounds (particularly undergraduates), and places of work. The number of citations was affected by the authors’ undergraduate and their locations of the work. This study suggested a need for more supports on basic researches by universities and funding bodies and an amendment of performance measures to include the number of citations.
교육과학기술부. (2010). SCI 과학기술논문 발표 현황. http://cesi.kedi.re.kr/.
권기석. (2009). 한국 이공계 대학교수의 특성과 산학협력의 방식 (1298-1314). 한국행정학회 동계학술발표논문집.
김완종. (2011). 2010년도 한국 과학자의 SCI 논문 계량분석. 한국과학기술정보연구원.
남영준. (2011). 우리나라 토목공학분야 연구자의 인용행태에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(4), 201-220.
박현우. (2010). 주요국의 학문분야별 과학연구의 영향력 분석. 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 10(3), 392-403.
유재복. (2010). 특허 인용에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석. 정보관리학회지, 27(1), 103-118.
이남영. (2009). 초록, 인용색인 그리고 E-Journal 데이터베이스의 한국 의학학술지피인용도 차이 분석 (121-126). 제16회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집.
임연기. (1998). 대학 연구활동의 측정․평가에 관한 연구. 교육행정학연구, 16(2), 358-384.
정연경. (2011). 국내 기록관리학 연구자들의 인용행태 분석 - 『한국기록관리학회지』(2001년-2010년)를 중심으로 -. 한국문헌정보학회지, 45(2), 367-391.
정희경. (2009). 국내 의학 학술지의 일정 주기별 SCI 피인용 최상위 논문 선정 방법 (127-132). 제16회한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집.
한국연구재단. (2012). 2012년도 전국대학 대학연구활동실태조사 분석보고서. 한국연구재단.
한국연구재단. 한국연구업적통합정보(Korean Researchers Information). http://www.kri.go.kr/kri/rp/main.jsp.
Aksnes, D. W.. (2011). Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 628-636.
Conkey, M.. (1991). Original narratives: The political economy of gender in archaeology, In Gender at the crossroads of knowledge:University of California Press.
Davis, P. M.. (2009). Author-choice open access publishing in the biological and medical literature: A citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 3-8.
Eysenbach, G.. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), 157-.
Hajjem, C.. (2006). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28(4), 39-47.
Harnad, S.. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access(OA)vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6), -.
Hutson, S. R.. (2006). Self-citation in archaeology: Age, gender, prestige, and the self. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 13(1), 1-18.
Krause, K.. (2009). Increasing your article's citation rates. http://works,bepress.com/kate_krause/12.
Long, J. S.. (1992). Measuring of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71(1), 159-178.
Maharana, B.. (2011). Citation analysis of top research papers in chemistry with specific reference to India. Library Review, 60(6), 501-512.
Quacquarelli Symonds. (2012). QS World University Rankings. http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2012.
Tilley, C.. (1989). Discourse and power: The genre of the Cambridge inaugural lecture, In Domination and resistance:Routledge.
Trifunac, M. D.. (2006). A note on publication and citation rates of female academics in earchquake engineering. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 26(11), 1063-1075.