바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.30 No.2

Citation Share

Analysis and Evaluation of Term Suggestion Services of Korean Search Portals: The Case of Naver and Google Korea

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2013, v.30 no.2, pp.297-315
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.2.297

(2013). Analysis and Evaluation of Term Suggestion Services of Korean Search Portals: The Case of Naver and Google Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(2), 297-315, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.2.297

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and evaluate term suggestion services of major search portals, Naver and Google Korea. In particular, this study evaluated relevance and currency of related search terms provided, and analyzed characteristics such as number and distribution of terms, and queries that did not produce terms. This study also analyzed types of terms in terms of the relationship between queries and terms, and investigated types and characteristics of harmful terms and terms with grammatical errors. Finally, Korean queries and English queries, and popular queries and academic queries were compared in terms of the amount and relevance of search terms provided. The results of this study show that the relevance and currency of Naver's related search terms are somewhat higher than those of Google. Both Naver and Google tend to add terms to or delete terms from original queries, and provide identical search terms or synonym terms rather than providing entirely new search terms. The results of this study can be implemented to the portal's effective development of term suggestion services.

keywords
search portals, term suggestion, related search, web searching, information retrieval, 검색 포털, 검색어 추천, 연관 검색, 웹 검색, 정보 검색, search portals, term suggestion, related search, web searching, information retrieval

Reference

1.

김지혜. (2010). 키워드 관련도를 이용한 뉴스기사의 연관 검색 기법 (53-57). 한국정보과학회 학술발표논문집.

2.

문상준. (2004). 검색어의 연관법칙 (10-12). 한국정보과학회 학술발표논문집.

3.

박성주. (2008). 검색엔진의 검색 결과 분석을 통한 병렬처리 기반의 연관 검색어 추천기법 (214-217). 한국정보과학회 학술발표논문집.

4.

박소연. (2011). 웹 검색 행태의 추이 및 변화 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 45(1), 377-393.

5.

박소연. (2005). 클릭 로그에 근거한 네이버 검색 질의의 형태 및 주제 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 39(1), 265-278.

6.

윤여생. (2012). 불법유해정보 법․제도 동향 분석. 정보보호학회지, 22(3), 25-36.

7.

이정훈. (2009). 검색어 질의 확장을 위한 추천 질의 랭킹 시스템 (210-214). 한국정보과학회 학술발표논문집.

8.

이준호. (2003). 질의 로그 분석을 통한 네이버 이용자의 검색 형태 연구. 정보관리학회지, 20(2), 27-42.

9.

주길홍. (2011). 효율적인 문서 검색을 위한 연관 키워드 추출 및 확산 클러스터링 방법. 한국정보기술학회논문지, 9(6), 155-166.

10.

최재봉. (2012). 인터넷 쇼핑몰 마케팅 비법:앱북스.

11.

한국인터넷자율정책기구(KISO). (2013). 연관검색어 및 자동완성검색어에 대한 정책결정 15호. http://www.kiso.or.kr/decision/decision_view.html.

12.

Arkin, H.. (1963). Tables for statisticians:Barnes & Noble Inc.

13.

Bates, M. J. (1981). Search techniques. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 16, 139-169.

14.

Beeferman, D.. (2000). Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log (407-416). Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.

15.

Chen, L.. (2011). Term suggestion with similarity measure based on semantic analysis techniques in query logs. Online Information Review, 35(1), 9-33.

16.

Croft, W. B.. (2012). 검색엔진 : 최신정보검색론:휴먼싸이언스.

17.

Huang, C.. (2003). Relevant term suggestion in interactive web search based on contextual information in query session logs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 5(7), 638-649.

18.

Liu, Y.. (2011). How do users describe their information need: Query recommendation based on snippet click model. Expert systems with applications, 38, 13847-13856.

19.

NHN.. (2013). 연관검색어는 어떤 서비스인가요?. http://help.naver.com/ops/faq/faqPrint.nhn?faqId=24796.

20.

Sanderson, M.. (2008). Ambiguous queries: Test collections need more sense (499-506). Proceedings of the 31st Annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval.

21.

Silverstein, C.. (1999). Analysis of a very large web search engine query log (6-12). SIGIR Forum.

22.

Spink, A.. (2001). Searching the Web : The public and their queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(3), 226-234.

23.

Xu, Z.. (2011). Mining Web search engines for query suggestion. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 23, 1101-1113.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy