바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.30 No.3

Citation Share

An Analysis on the Effectiveness of Book Selection and Circulation After Introducing to Subject Librarian

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2013, v.30 no.3, pp.229-247
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.3.229


& (2013). An Analysis on the Effectiveness of Book Selection and Circulation After Introducing to Subject Librarian. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(3), 229-247, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.3.229

Abstract

This study analyzed the difference between the two situations to verify the effectiveness of the book selection by the subject professionals in a academic library. In this, some circulation statistics before and after introduction to subject specialists were compared. Moreover, by using Minitab and t-test, ANOVA among other statistical techniques, 186,435 books selected 3 years before September 2005 and after 3 years and 622,213 circulation statistics about those books in ‘S’ University Library were compared and analysed. The results were as follows: (1) After introduction to the subject librarian, the proportion of books selected by librarians were increased. (2) After introduction to subject reference librarian, the foreign books selected by the faculty and the librarians were statistically significantly increased. (3) By academic field, the academic fields of the books selected by the faculty were significantly increased, but the academic fields of the books selected by the students were significantly decreased.

keywords
주제전문사서, 대학도서관, 도서선정, 대출, 사례연구, subject librarian, academic library, book selection, circulation, case study

Reference

1.

김정근. (1993). 대학도서관에 있어서 사서중심의 장서 개발은 가능한가?. 도서관학논집, 20, 61-105.

2.

김정근. (2001). 교수는 적합한 선정자인가. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 32(1), 151-170.

3.

김충령. 대학생들 ‘폰’은 가깝고 책은 멀다.

4.

남여훈. (2011). 대학도서관의 주제전문서비스 운영 현황에 관한 연구.

5.

성동희. (2008). 장서 선정업무의 정책 소개. 사대도협회지, 9, 187-204.

6.

황옥경. (2007). 대학도서관에서의 도서 선정 주체에 따른 도서 선정 효과성 비교. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(1), 125-138.

7.

Connell, T. H.. (1991). Comparing the circulation of library materials ordered by faculty and librarians. Collection Management, 14(1), 73-84.

8.

Crossley, C. A.. (1974). The subject specialist librarian in an academic library: His role and place (236-249). Aslib Proceedings.

9.

Hamaber, C. A.. (1992). Some measures of cost effectiveness in library collections. Journal of Library Administration, 16(3), 57-69.

10.

Martin, J. V.. (1996). Subject specialization in British university libraries : A second survey. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 28(3), 159-169.

11.

Millson-Martula, C.. (1985). The effectiveness of book selection agents in a small academic library. College & Research Libraries, 46(6), 504-510.

12.

Mouyal, K. F.. (2007). A balancing act: User demand versus programs driven collection management at a small, regional academic library. Collection Management, 30(4), 43-57.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy