바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.31 No.1
Citation Share

A Study on Typology of Japanese Institutional Repositories and Features of Groups

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2014, v.31 no.1, pp.143-161
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.143

(2014). A Study on Typology of Japanese Institutional Repositories and Features of Groups. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(1), 143-161, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.143
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

While dCollections of Korea have been initiated by a government for metadata harvesting, institutional repositories of Japan have been managed as instituion’s independent tool for not only collectiong, archiving and distributing their intellecture assets, but also realizing open access. This study analyzes IRDB of Japanese statistically for understanding features of institutional repositories and by clustering the repository on the basis of types of contents, the differences have been brightened. According to analysis result, Japanese repository contains diverse types of contents, such as journal articles, scholarly papers, text books and technical reports. etc. and clustered by five distinguished group with different contents type.

keywords
기관 레포지토리, 일본, IRDB, NII, institutional repository, Japan, IRDB, NII

Reference

1.

곽승진. (2008). 오픈액세스 리포지터리의 사용성 평가에 관한 연구. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 39(4), 67-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2008.39.4.067.

2.

国立情報学研究所. (2005). 学術機関リポジトリ構築ソフトウェア実装実験プロジェクト報告書. .

3.

김미향. (2010). 기관 리포지터리 S-Space 운영 및 활성화. 국립대학도서관보, 28, 95-120.

4.

백종명. (2013). 국내 기관 리포지터리 콘텐츠 현황분석 및 개선방안에 관한 연구 (83-87). 한국정보관리학회 학술대회논문집.

5.

北海道大学. (2008). 機関リポジトリコミュニティの活性化. http://mitizane.ll.chiba-u.jp/metadb/up/irwg13/20080613_CSI-report_NII.pdf.

6.

安達淳. (2011). 国立情報学研究所における共用リポジトリサービス. http://www.nii.ac.jp/irp/event/2011/debrief/pdf/panel_05.pdf.

7.

양혜미. (2007). 오픈 소스 소프트웨어를 이용한 기관 리포지터리 구축에 관한 연구.

8.

逸村裕. (2007). 動向レビュー：日本における機関リポジトリの展開：学術情報流通と蓄積の変容. http://current.ndl.go.jp/CA1626.

9.

장금연. (2013). 학술정보 유통을 위한 기관 레포지터리 운영모형 개발 연구. 정보관리학회지, 30(1), 93-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.093.

10.

정경희. (2010). 대학의 오픈액세스 정책 수립시 구성요소에 관한 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 41(2), 229-250.

11.

정영미. (2010). 성공적인 리포지터리의 운영정책에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(4), 131-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.4.131.

12.

조재인. (2009). 일본의 전개 양상을 통해서 본 한국 기관 레포지토리의 과제. 정보관리학회지, 26(1), 35-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.1.035.

13.

조재인. (2012). 한국과 일본의 대학 학술정보 공유 유통 체계 비교 연구. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 43(4), 23-45.

14.

한국교육학술정보원. (2010). 교육정보화백서:한국교육학술정보원.

15.

Jones, E.. (2008). E-Science talking points for ARL deans and directors. http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/e-science-talking-points.pdf.

16.

McDonald RH. (2008). The case for standardized reporting and assessment requirements for institutional repositories. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 20(2), 101-109.

17.

(2011). NII Instituional Repository Program Hompage. http://www.nii.ac.jp/irp/archive/statistic/irp_2011_statistic.html&usg=ALkJrhg2VWODeVtkFp85izkFDcdvvWid1AOpenDOARHompage.Retrievedfromhttp://www.opendoar.org.

18.

Oppenheim C.. (2008). Electronic scholarly publishing and open access. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 577-590.

19.

Society Copyright Policies in Japan(SCPJ) Homepage. http://scpj.tulips.tsukuba.ac.jp.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy