바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.31 No.1

Citation Share

A Study on the Comparison of Applying RDA in US Academic Libraries

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2014, v.31 no.1, pp.77-97
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.077

(2014). A Study on the Comparison of Applying RDA in US Academic Libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(1), 77-97, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.077

Abstract

It is necessary to find the practical considerations for applying RDA in building up the bibliographic records by importing RDA records from LC or OCLC in Korea. Especially, it is not easy to apply RDA appropriately because there are many alternatives and options in RDA. Therefore, this study is to grasp the way for applying RDA in building up the bibliographic records by reviewing LC RDA guidelines and analyzing RDA cataloging policies of libraries such as University of Chicago, North Carolina State University, and Standford University. As a result, these libraries have catalogued according to LC RDA guidelines and each library has its own guidelines, i.e., in statement of responsibilities, to transcribe all but exceptionally allow to transcribe only first, in publication statement, to use 264 field or 260 field, and in resource types, to transcribe all types of content, media and carrier or to transcribe 33X with GMD. Therefore followings would be considered for RDA application. First, some variations could be allowed for special situations of libraries in applying RDA and LC RDA guidelines. Second, the hybrid records that describe the core element of RDA to non-RDA records would be written in processing AACR2 to RDA. Third, the display of 33X field would be designed for expressing the resource types.

keywords
RDA, 목록규칙, 하이브리드레코드, LC RDA 입력지침, RDA, cataloging rules, hybrid record, LC RDA Core Elements

Reference

1.

이미화. (2013). RDA의 해외도서관 적용 사례 (9-44). 2013 디지털도서관 심포지엄 Ⅱ: RDA 새로운 도전그리고 과제. 국립중앙도서관.

2.

ALA. (2010). RDA toolkit:ALA.

3.

Cronin, C.. (2011). From testing to implementation : Managing full-scale RDA adoption at the University of Chicago. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49, 626-646.

4.

Davis, R.. (2010). Changing AACR2 records to RDA records. http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/staffweb/depts/cat/rda/ChangingAACR2recordstoRDArecords.pdf.

5.

Dyla, J.. (2012). Report: RDA at Standford. http://lib.stanford.edu/metadata-department/metadata-developmet-unit/see-whats-new/rda-stanford_report26June2012.

6.

El-Sherbini, M.. (2013). RDA : strategies for implementation:ALA.

7.

Library of Congress. (2012). LC RDA core elements. http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/core_elements.pdf.

8.

North Carolina State University. (2010). Rule of 3. https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/Rule+of+3.

9.

North Carolina State University. (2012). Relationship designators (Relator Terms). https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/Relationship+Designators+%28Relator+Terms%29.

10.

North Carolina State University. (2013). 336-338 fields. https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/336-338+fields.

11.

North Carolina State University. (2013). 264 field. https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/264+Field.

12.

North Carolina State University. (2013). Policy on RDA monographic cataloging. https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/Policy+on+RDA+Monographic+Cataloging.

13.

OCLC. (2013). OCLC RDA policy statement. http://oclc.org/rda/new-policy.en.html.

14.

Stanford University. (2011). Standford - RDA post-test: Stanford vs. LC decisions. https://lib.stanford.edu/metadata-department/stanford-rda-post-test-stanford-vs-lc-decisions-upd-22011.

15.

U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. (2011). Report and recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/source/rdatesting-finalreport-20june2011.pdf.

16.

University of Chicago. (2010). Library timeline for RDA testing. http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/staffweb/depts/cat/rda/uofctimeline.pdf.

17.

University of Chicago. (2010). Policies & Decisions on Choices in RDA. http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/staffweb/depts/cat/rda/policiesandchoicesinrda.pdf.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

e-Submission OA Policy