바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1013-0799
  • E-ISSN2586-2073
  • KCI

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.31 No.3

Citation Share

오픈액세스 확산을 위한 APC 지원 정책에 관한 연구

A Study on APC Subsidy Policies to Encourage OA Publishing

정보관리학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2014, v.31 no.3, pp.249-270
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.249
신은자 (세종대학교)
신은자. (2014). 오픈액세스 확산을 위한 APC 지원 정책에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(3), 249-270, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.249

초록

전체 학술지 논문 가운데 오픈액세스(Open Access, OA)가 차지하는 비중은 현재 20%-30%에 이르고 있고, 최근에는 출판 즉시 오픈액세스가 가능한 골드 OA에 대한 관심이 높다. 이 연구는 골드 OA를 출판하기 위한 선결 조건인 ‘논문 처리 수수료(Article Processing Charges, APC)’ 지원에 관한 것으로 연구후원기관과 저자의 재직대학에서 어떠한 정책을 수립하여 실천하고 있는지를 알아보았다. 영국을 비롯한 유럽에서는 수년 동안 연구후원기관의 APC 부담에 관한 타당성 검토와 시범사업을 진행하여 왔고, 현재 본격적으로 시행하고 있는 단계이다. 미국을 비롯한 북미에서는 주요 대학도서관을 중심으로 OA 펀드를 조성하여 APC를 지원하고 있다. 반면에 한국은 연구후원기관과 대학에서 논문의 그린 OA를 추진할 뿐, APC를 지원하여 골드 OA를 출판하는 단계에 이르지 못하고 있다. 주제 분야에 따라 다르지만 국제 학술지에 논문을 출판하는 국내 연구자도 적지 않아 이들의 논문이 골드 OA로 출판된다면 국제적인 파급력은 크게 증진될 전망이다. 이에 국내 연구후원기관과 대학도 골드 OA에 관심을 갖고 OA 전문 학술지와 하이브리드 학술지에서 요구하는 APC를 지원하는 방향으로 정책의 기본 틀을 세우려는 노력을 경주해야 할 것으로 보인다.

keywords
open access, OA, Gold OA, Article Processing Charge, APC, author pay model, funder, 오픈액세스, 골드오픈액세스, 논문처리수수료, 저자지불모델, 연구후원기관

Abstract

OA journal publishing has steadily increased its relative share of all scholarly journal articles by about 20%-30%. The ‘Gold’ OA, often preferred by readers, refers to journal articles which are more widely available through the journal’s web site immediately. This study analyzed funder and university’s policy for paying APCs in implementing a Gold OA. In recent years there have been a number of attempts in the UK and Europe to stimulate more systematic arrangements for paying APCs, leading funders have clearly established arrangements in place. Also OA fund made by major universities in North America provides publisher with APCs. On the other hand, it is still in early stages in paying with gold OA requirements from Korean funders and universities. The funders have a ‘Green’ OA policy, such as upload the article accepted version to their online platform. Although it varies by field, many Korean authors are publishing in international journals. Their articles’ impacts would rise when they are published as gold OA. Therefore, funders and universities need to pay attention to gold OA　publishing and set up subsidies for APCs which are required by OA or hybrid journal publishers.

keywords
open access, OA, Gold OA, Article Processing Charge, APC, author pay model, funder, 오픈액세스, 골드오픈액세스, 논문처리수수료, 저자지불모델, 연구후원기관

참고문헌

1.

정경희. (2012). 오픈액세스 학술지 출판에서 대학도서관의 역할에 대한 고찰 - COPE 참가 대학도서관을 중심으로 -. 한국비블리아학회지, 23(4), 45-69.

2.

질병관리본부. 공공저작물 자유이용. http://www.kogl.or.kr/open/info/character.do.

3.

한국연구재단. 인문사회분야 학술연구지원사업 처리규정. http://www.nrf.re.kr/nrf_tot_cms/board/notice/view.jsp?show_no=177&c_now_tab=0&check_no=176&c_relation=bizmenu&c_relation2=10&c_relation3=0&c_relation4=0&page=2&NTS_NO=43714.

4.

Björk, B. C.. (2012). The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: A failed experiment?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1496-1504.

5.

Björk, B. C.. (2010). Open access to the scientific journal literature : Situation 2009. PLoS One, 5(6), 1-9.

6.

Björk, B. C.. (2012). Pricing principles used by scholarly open access publishers. Learned Publishing, 25(2), 132-137.

7.

Björk, B. C.. (2014). How research funders can finance APCs in full OA and hybrid journals. Learned Publishing, 27(2), 93-103.

8.

Björk, B.C.. (2014). Developing an effective market for open access article processing charges. Wellcome Trust Report. http://www.wellcome,ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlight-issues/Open-access/Guides/WTP054773.htm.

9.

Cheng, W.. (2008). Evolution of open access publishing in Chinese scientific journals. Learned Publishing, 21(2), 140-152.

10.

COPE. Compact for open-access publishing equity. http://www.oacompact.org/compact/.

11.

Dallmeier-Tiessen, S.. Highlights from the SOAP project survey.

12.

Eckman, C. D.. (2010). Institutional open access funds : Now is the time. PLoS Biology, 8(5), 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000375.

13.

Eysenbach, G.. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), 692-698.

14.

Fernandez, L.. (2011). Open access funds : a Canadian library survey. Partnership:the Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 6(1), 1-24.

15.

Gargouri, Y.. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), 1-12.

16.

Harnad, S.. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access(OA)vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-lib Magazine, 10(6), -.

17.

Harnad, S.. (2011). Open access to research : changing researcher behavior through university and funder mandates. JEDEM Journal of Democracy and Open Government, 3(1), 33-41.

18.

Hindson, K. J.. (2013). Editorial: Show me the money! How, as a chemist, can I find funding for open-access publishing?. ChemistryOpen, 2(1), 3-5.

19.

JISC. (2013). Implementing open access APCs: the role of academic libraries. http://www.uk.sagepub.com/repository/binaries/pdf/apc.pdf.

20.

Krause, K.. Open access mandates. http://works.bepress.com/kate_krause/10.

21.

Laakso, M.. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6), 1-10.

22.

Laakso, M.. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing: A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine, 10, 1-9.

23.

Lawrence, S.. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact. Nature, 411(6837), 521-521.

24.

Nariani, R.. (2012). Open access publishing: what authors want. College & Research Libraries, 73(2), 182-195.

25.

Pinfield, S.. (2013). Is scholarly publishing going from crisis to crisis?. Learned Publishing, 26(2), 85-88.

26.

RCUK. (2013). RCUK policy on open access and supporting guidance. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/openaccess/policy/.

27.

Shieber, S. M.. (2009). Equity for open-access journal publishing. PLoS Biology, 7(8), 1-3.

28.

Solomon, D. J.. (2012). Publication fees in open access publishing : Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1), 98-107.

29.

Solomon, D. J.. (2012). A study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1485-1495.

30.

Suber, P.. (2012). Open access overview: Focusing on open access to peer-reviewed research articles and their preprints. http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm.

31.

Swan, A.. The open access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/268516.

32.

Verhagen, N.. (2013). Hybrid OA - a way to go?. Insights, 26(1), 51-54.

33.

Wellcome Trust. (2013). Business, innovation and skills committee: Inquiry into open access. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@policy_communications/documents/web_document/wtp052232.pdf.

34.

Wellcome Trust. (2014). Open access policy: Position statement in support of open and unrestricted access to published research. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Policy-and-position-statements/WTD002766.htm.

정보관리학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책