바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study on the Intellectual Structure Networks of International Collaboration in Psychiatry

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2016, v.33 no.1, pp.53-84
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.1.053



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study clarified the intellectual structure of international collaboration in psychiatry based on analyzing networks in order to vitalize for international collaboration in psychiatry in South Korea. The data set was collected from Web of Science citation database during the period from 2009 to 2013. SU=“psychiatry” search formulary (means field of psychiatric medical research) was used through advanced retrieval function and a total of 18,590 articles were selected among international collaborations. A total of 85 different keywords were selected from the 18,590 articles, and the results of analysis were as follows. First, this study examined 8 sub-subject areas focusing on disorders, and found that major subject areas could be divided into a total of 8 sub-subject areas. Second, this study examined 6 keywords that have a strong impact, and extend subject areas by promoting intermediation between other keywords Third, this study examined sub-subject areas by using the Knowledge Classification Scheme of the National Research Foundation of Korea through community analysis, and found a total of 15 clusters and a total of 12 sub-subject areas.

keywords
국제공동연구, 키워드 네트워크 분석, 지적구조, 커뮤니티 분석, 정신의학, international collaboration, keyword networks analysis, intellectual structure, community analysis, psychiatry

Reference

1.

김은주. (2015). 정신의학 분야 국제공동연구의 지식구조 네트워크에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 32(3), 317-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.3.317.

2.

남궁현. (2014). 마리화나 정책 변화의 고찰: 콜로라도 마리화나 합법화의 경우. 형사정책연구, 25(3), 1-28.

3.

대한신경정신의학회. (2005). 신경정신의학:중앙문화사.

4.

(2014). 대한의학회 의학용어 검색 사이트. http://www.kams.or.kr/word_new/index.php.

5.

(2015). 메디컬 업저버: 대한정신약물학회 (-). 2014 추계학술대회.

6.

미래창조과학부. 국가연구개발사업 표준성과지표 -성과목표․지표 설정 가이드라인.

7.

민성길. (2006). 최신정신의학:일조각.

8.

보건복지부. 정신건강정책 설명 자료집.

10.

서선경. (2013). 동시출현단어 분석 기반 오픈 액세스 분야 지적구조에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 24(1), 207-228.

12.

송민선. (2015). 국내 한국학 분야의 연구 영역 식별을 위한 거시적 지식구조 분석 연구. 정보관리학회지, 32(3), 221-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.3.221.

13.

송후림. (2013). 염증질환으로서의 우울증. 대한정신약물학회지, 24(1), 5-10.

15.

이수상. (2012). 네트워크 분석 방법론:논형.

16.

이재윤. (2011). 계량서지적 기법을 활용한 LED 핵심 주제영역의 연구 동향 분석. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 42(3), 1-26.

17.

이재윤. (2011). 연구지원 서비스를 위한 계량서지적 분석- 국제백신연구소 연구동향을 대상으로 (11-16). 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집.

18.

임지영. (2011). 경계선과 반사회성 성격병리에서의 충동성과 공격성 비교. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30(1), 71-92.

19.

장임숙. (2011). 다문화연구의 지식구조에 관한 네트워크 분석. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 42(4), 353-374.

21.

조철현. (2014). DSM-5의 조현병 스펙트럼 장애 : 새로운 변화인가?. 대한조현병학회지, 17(1), 5-11.

22.

조현양. (2012). 국내 수의과학 분야의 지적 구조 분석에 관한 연구. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 43(2), 43-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2012.43.2.043.

24.

통계청. 2013년 사망원인통계.

26.

한국보건산업진흥원. (2011). 2011년 보건산업 기술수준조사-주요 분야별 전문가 동향분석 및 제언. 복지부.

27.

한국보건산업진흥원. (2013). 정신질환분야 R&D 동향 및 시사점. 한국보건산업진흥원.

28.

한국연구재단. 2015년 의약학 RB분야 설명 및 활용 안내.

29.

Appleton, K. M.. (2013). Depression and mortality: Artifact of measurement and analysis?. Journal of Affective Disorders, 151(2), 632-638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.07.010.

30.

Fodor, K. E.. (2014). Is traumatic stress research global? A bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5, 23269-. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v5.23269.

31.

Fanous, A. H.. (2009). Genetic variation in the serotonin 2A receptor and suicidal ideation in a sample of 270irish high-density schizophrenia families. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part BNeuropsychiatric Genetics, 150(3), 411-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30833.

32.

Girvan, M.. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(12), 7821-7826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122653799.

33.

Grigoriadis, S.. (2010). A comparison of desipramine response in younger and older women. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 30(1), 80-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181c82717.

34.

Kadushin, C.. (2012). Understanding social networks: Theories, concepts, and findings:Oxford University Press.

35.

Lariviere, V.. (2013). International comparative performance of mental health research, 1980-2011. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 23(11), 1340-1347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.01.006.

37.

Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning. Standard performance metrics of national R&D. (revision).

38.

Romera, I.. (2013). Systematic depression screening in high-risk patients attending primary care: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial. Bmc Psychiatry, 13(1), 83-. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244x-13-83.

39.

Uosukainen, H.. (2013). Mortality among clients seeking treatment for buprenorphine abuse in Finland. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 133(2), 391-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.06.022.

40.

van Gastel, W. A.. (2013). Cigarette smoking and cannabis use are equally strongly associated with psychotic-like experiences: A cross-sectional study in 1929 young adults. Psychological Medicine, 43(11), 2393-2401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0033291713000202.

41.

World Health Organization. (2008). The global burden of disease report : 2004 update. World Health Organization.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management