- P-ISSN1013-0799
- E-ISSN2586-2073
- KCI
Analysis of Factors Influencing Patent Citations: Focused on Korea Medical Device Patents
Abstract
The valuation of patented technology has been recently emphasized, and the patent citation is known as an important factor. This study performed a generalized linear model to find variables that effect the patent citation. We classified 13 variables as morphological, technological and conceptual factors and used them to find out effective variables in 14 medical devices classification. Through the empirical study, we found seven effective variables (assignee nationality, assignee character, the number of inventors, the number of application countries, the number of IPC, the number of references, the strength of bibliographic coupling). In order to apply to Korean industry, this study has significance that provides basic research to citation analysis model.
- keywords
- 특허인용분석, 특허 피인용횟수, 특허인용 영향요인, 의료기기, patent citation analysis, patent citation counts, factors influencing patent citation, medical device
Reference
권오진. (2006). 특허 인용 정보를 이용한 과학-기술-산업 지식 흐름에 관한 연구 (706-710). 한국콘텐츠학회 2006 추계 종합학술대회 논문집.
김지은. (2013). 특허정보를 활용한 산업융합성 평가 방법론 : 기술연관분석. 대한산업공학회지, 39(3), 212-221.
박종용. (2008). 특허인용 관계를 이용한 기술지식 흐름의 실증분석 : 산업수준의 네트워크 분석과 클러스터 분석.
박준형. (2013). 기업 간 특허인용 관계 결정요인에 관한 연구 : MR-QAP분석. 지능정보연구, 19(4), 21-37.
엄대호. (2010). 한국특허정보의 통계분석에 관한 연구. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 41(3), 27-44.
유재복. (2010). 특허 인용의 영향요인 분석을 통한 예측모형 구축에 관한 연구.
유재복. (2010). 특허 인용에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석. 정보관리학회지, 27(1), 103-118.
유재복. (2010). 특허인용 예측모형 구축에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(4), 239-258.
이민정. (2016). 특허 인용 네트워크 분석.
이유아. (2015). 우리나라 의료기기산업의 대중국 경쟁력 연구. 통상정보연구, 17(3), 93-114.
이창영. (2015). 기술로드맵 작성을 위한 새로운 접근 방법: 특허패밀리와 피인용건수를 기반으로.
정영미. (2012). 정보검색연구:연세대학교출판문화원.
정유진. (2011). Technology Planning through Technology Roadmap: Application of Patent Citation Network. 한국산학기술학회논문지, 12(11), 5227-5237.
최병돈. (2012). 의료서비스 품질 측정 요인: 의료서비스 인증 평가지표를 중심으로. 품질경영학회지, 40(3), 381-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.3.381.
Dutta, S.. (1997). The relationship between a firm's level of technological innovativeness and its pattern of partnership agreements. Management Science, 43(3), 343-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.3.343.
Griliches, Z.. (2007). R&D, patents and productivity:University of Chicago Press.
Ham, R. M.. (1998). The evolving role of semiconductor consortia in the United States and Japan. California Management Review, 41(1), 137-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41165979.
Han, Y. J.. (2006). Patent network analysis of inter-industrial knowledge flows: The case of Korea between traditional and emerging industries. World Patent Information, 28(3), 235-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2006.01.015.
Hu, A. G.. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: The cases of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(6), 849-880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7187(03)00035-3.
Jaffe, A. B.. (1999). Privatizing R&D: Patent policy and the commercialization of national laboratory technologies. Rand Journal of Economics, 32(1), 167-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2696403.
Jaffe, A. B.. (1996). Flows of knowledge from universities and federal labs:Modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries. National Academy of Sciences, 93(23), 12671-12677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.23.12671.
Jaffe, A. B.. (1999). International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1-2), 105-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10438599900000006.
Jaffe, A. B.. (2000). Knowledge spillovers and patent citations:Evidence from a survey of inventors. The American Economic Review, 90(2), 215-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2.215.
Lai, K. K.. (2005). Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system. Information Processing & Management, 41(2), 313-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2003.11.004.
Lanjouw, J. O.. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. The Economic Journal, 114(495), 441-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x.
이용길. (2006). An Analysis of Citation Counts of ETRI-Invented US Patents. ETRI Journal, 28(4), 541-544.
Lin, B. W.. (2007). Predicting citations to biotechnology patents based on the information from the patent documents. International Journal of Technology Management, 40(1-3), 87-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2007.013528.
Moorman, C.. (1999). The contingency value of complementary capabilities in product development. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 239-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3152096.
Mowery, D. C.. (1998). Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27(5), 507-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00066-3.
Narin, F.. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00013-9.
Park, Y.. (2005). The idiosyncrasy and dynamism of technological innovation across industries: Patent citation analysis. Technology in Society, 27(4), 471-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.08.003.
Shin, J.. (2007). Building the national ICT frontier: The case of Korea. Information Economics and Policy, 19(2), 249-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.01.003.
Sorenson, O.. (2006). Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy, 35(7), 994-1017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.002.
Trajtenberg, M.. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2555502.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations