- P-ISSN1013-0799
- E-ISSN2586-2073
- KCI
A Study on Interdisciplinary Structure of Big Data Research with Journal-Level Bibliographic-Coupling Analysis
Abstract
Interdisciplinary approach has been recognized as one of key strategies to address various and complex research problems in modern science. The purpose of this study is to investigate the interdisciplinary characteristics and structure of the field of big data. Among the 1,083 journals related to the field of big data, multiple Subject Categories (SC) from the Web of Science were assigned to 420 journals (38.8%) and 239 journals (22.1%) were assigned with the SCs from different fields. These results show that the field of big data indicates the characteristics of interdisciplinarity. In addition, through bibliographic coupling network analysis of top 56 journals, 10 clusters in the network were recognized. Among the 10 clusters, 7 clusters were from computer science field focusing on technical aspects such as storing, processing and analyzing the data. The results of cluster analysis also identified multiple research works of analyzing and utilizing big data in various fields such as science & technology, engineering, communication, law, geography, bio-engineering and etc. Finally, with measuring three types of centrality (betweenness centrality, nearest centrality, triangle betweenness centrality) of journals, computer science journals appeared to have strong impact and subjective relations to other fields in the network.
- keywords
- 빅데이터, 학제성, 서지결합 분석, 네트워크 분석, big data, interdisciplinarity, bibliographic coupling analysis, network analysis
Reference
김대현. (2010). 고등교육에서 학제성의 개념과 유형에 관한 고찰. 교육사상연구, 24(3), 31-46.
김민지. (2011). Co-Classification 방법을 이용한 태양전지 연구의 학제간 다양성 분석. 신재생에너지, 7(1), 36-44.
김완종. (2014). 동시출현 단어분석을 활용한 빅데이터 관련 연구동향 분석 (17-20). 한국정보관리학회 학술대회논문집.
김현영. (2014). 빅 데이터에 따른 지적정보의 효율화 방안 연구. 한국지적정보학회지, 16(1), 29-48.
이재윤. COOC. (Version 0.4) [Computer Software].
이재윤. WNET. (Version 0.4.1) [Computer Software].
이재윤. (2006). 계량서지적 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 척도에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(3), 191-214.
이재윤. (2006). 연구자 소속과 표제어 분석을 통한 국내 인지과학 분야의 학제적 구조 파악 (127-134). 제13회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집.
이정미. (2013). 빅데이터의 이해와 도서관 정보서비스에의 활용. 한국비블리아학회지, 24(4), 53-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.4.053.
정은경. (2011). Interdisciplinary Collaborations in the Domain of Digital Libraries. 정보관리학회지, 28(2), 37-51.
정연경. (2012). 국내 기록관리학 분야 학술지에 나타난 학제성 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(2), 7-27.
Bartol, T.. (2014). Assessment of research fields in Scopus and Web of Science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1491-1504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1148-8.
Gartner. (2012). Gartner Identifies the Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2013. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2209615.
Hargens, L. L.. (1986). Migration patterns of U.S. Ph.D.s among disciplines and specialties. Scientometrics, 9(3-4), 145-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02017238.
Huang, Y.. (2016). How does national scientific funding support emerging interdisciplinary research: A comparison study of big data research in the US and China. PLoS ONE, 11(5), e0154509-. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154509.
Leydesdorff, L.. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303-1319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20614.
Manyika, J.. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/business-technology/our-insights/big-data-the-next-frontier-for-innovatio.
McAfee, A.. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 60-66.
Morillo, F.. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203-222.
Morillo, F.. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237-1249.
National Academies Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research:National Academies Press.
OECD. Interdisciplinarity in Science and Technology. T. Directorate for Science, and Industry.
Morillo, F.. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1237-1249.
Park, H. W.. (2013). Decomposing social and semantic networks in emerging “big data” research. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 756-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.05.004.
Qin, J.. (1997). Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 893-916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199710)48:10<893::aid-asi5>3.0.co;2-x.
Rousseau, R.. (2012). A view on big data and its relation to Informetrics. Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science, 5(3), 12-26.
Shiri, A.. (2014). Making sense of big data: A facet analysis approach. Knowledge Organization, 41(5), 357-368.
Small, H.. (2010). Maps of science as interdisciplinary discourse: Co-citation contexts and the role of analogy. Scientometrics, 83(3), 835-849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0121-z.
Steele, T. W.. (2000). The impact of interdisciplinary research in the environmental sciences: A forestry case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(5), 476-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(2000)51:5<476::aid-asi8>3.0.co;2-g.
Urata, H.. (1990). Information flows among academic disciplines in Japan. Scientometrics, 18(3-4), 309-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02017767.
Wagner, C. S.. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 14-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004.
Yang, R.. (2013). Bibliometrical analysis on the big data research in China. Journal of Digital Information Management, 11(6), 383-390.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations