바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

논문 상세

제품의 추가기능 수에 따른 소비자의 제품가용성 지각: 자기조절초점과 프리어나운싱의 시간적 거리에 따른조절효과를 중심으로

The Effect of Adding New Features in Convergence Products on Consumer's Perceived Product Usability: Moderating Effect of Self-Regulatory Focus and Temporal Distance of Preannouncement

초록

본 연구는 컨버전스 제품의 추가기능 수에 따른 소비자의 제품가용성 지각에 영향을 미치는 소비자의 자기조절초점 유형과 프리어나운싱의 시간적 거리 효과를 집단 간 실험설계(between subjects design)를 통하여 검증하였다. 연구 결과, 제품의 추가기능 수가 많을수록 소비자의 제품가용성 지각은 더 높게 나타났으며 예방초점의 소비자보다 향상초점의 소비자들이 컨버전스 제품의 추가기능 수에 따른 제품가용성을 더 높게 지각하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 프리어나운싱의 시간적 거리에 따른 제품가용성 지각효과는 향상초점의 소비자보다 예방초점의 소비자에게서 유의미하게 나타났다. 즉 예방초점의 소비자는 컨버전스 제품의 추가기능 수가 많은 경우 프리어나운싱의 시간적 거리가 가까운 미래일 때 제품가용성을 더 높게 지각하였다. 본 연구는 컨버전스 제품에 있어 자기조절초점과 프리어나운싱의 시간적 거리간의 상호작용이 소비자의 가용성 지각에 중요한 변수임을 보여 주었다는데 의의가 있다. 또한 본 연구의 결과는 기업에게 타겟 소비자의 조절 초점에 따른 신제품 프리어나운싱의 적절한 시점을 선정하는데 유용한 시사점을 제공해 줄 수 있다.

keywords
product usability, self-regulatory focus, preannouncement, temporal distance, 컨버전스 제품, 제품가용성, 자기조절초점, 프리어나운싱, 시간적 거리

Abstract

Digital convergent products are omnipresent. Do consumers always evaluate convergent products with lots of new features positively? This study investigates how adding new features in convergent product affect on consumers' perceived product usability. This study also examines moderating effect of self-regulatory focus and new product preannouncement type. This study has a 2 (number of features: low/high) x 2 (regulatory focus: prevention vs. promotion) x 2 (temporal distance of preannouncement: near future vs. distance future) between subject design. The results demonstrated that consumers were more likely to perceive product usability higher when number of new features added was high. The moderating effect of self-regulatory focus was also significant. Compared to the prevention-focused consumers, promotion-focused consumers were more likely to perceive product usability higher when added new features were high. Lastly, it was found that three way effect was significant. When the number of new features added was high and preannouncement is near future, perceived product usability was higher for prevention-focused consumers compared to promotion-focused consumers. The implication of these findings were discussed.

keywords
product usability, self-regulatory focus, preannouncement, temporal distance

참고문헌

1.

김영호, 최자영, 성정환 (2011), “조절초점에 따른 IT 제품에서 새로운 기능의 추가가 제품평가에 미치는 영향, 한국심리학회지:소비자․광고, 12(1), 127-147.

2.

나준희, 이용학, 김인구 (2007), “브랜드 확장에있어서 시간적 거리를 이용한 프리어나운싱의 효과,” 마케팅연구, 22(3), 1-17.

3.

이병관, 조은현 (2009), “신제품 수용에 미치는소비자의 혁신성과 조절초점의 효과연구,”광고학연구, 20(1), 127-143.

4.

Aaker, Jennifer L. and Angela Y. Lee (2001), “‘I’Seek Pleasure and ‘We’ Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 33-49.

5.

Becker-Olsen, Karen L., B. Andrew Cudmore, and Ronald P. Hill (2006), “The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46-53.

6.

Brown, Christina L. and Gregory S. Carpenter (2000), “Why Is the Trivial Important? A Reason-Based Account for the Effects of Trivial Attributes on Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 372-385.

7.

Calantone, Roger J. and Kim E. Schatzel (2000), “Strategic Foretelling: Communication-Based Antecedents of a Firm’s Propensity to Preannounce.” Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 17-30.

8.

Carpenter, Gregory S., Rashi Glazer, and Kent Nakamoto (1994), “Meaningful Brands from Meaningless Differentiation: The Dependence on Irrelevant Attributes,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31(3), 339-350.

9.

Carver, Charle S., an Michael F. Scheier (1999), Themes and Issues in the Self-regulation of Behavior. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), Advances in Social Cognition 12, 1-106. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.

10.

Castaňo, Raquel, Mita Sujan, Manish Kacker, and Harish Sujan (2008), “Managing Consumer Uncertainty in the Adoption of New Products: Temporal Distance and Mental Simulation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 320-336.

11.

Chin, John P., Virginia A. Diehl, and Kent L. Norman (1988), “Development of an Instrument Measuring User Satisfaction of the Human-Computer Interface,” in Human Factors in Computer Systems, CHI'88 Conference Proceedings. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 213-28.

12.

Computerworld (1994), Announce, 9(July), 14.

13.

Crowe, Ellen and E. Tory Higgins (1997), “Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations:Promotion and Prevention in Decision Making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117-132.

14.

Eliashberg, Jehoshua and Thomas S. Robertson (1988), “New Product Preannouncing Behavior:A Market Signaling Study,” Journal of Marketing Research. 25(3). 282-292.

15.

Forster, Jens, Higgins E. Tory, and Lorraine C. Idson (1998), “Approach and Avoidance Strength as a Function of Regulatory Focus:Revisiting the ‘Goal Looms Larger’ effect,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1115-1131.

16.

Goldenberg, Jacob, Roni Horowitz, Amnon Levav, and David Mazursky (2003), “Finding Your Innovation Sweet Spot,” Harvard Business Review, 81 (March), 120-129.

17.

Goldsmith, Ronald E. (2001), “Using the Domain Specific Innovativeness Scale to identify innovative Internet consumers,” Internet Research, 11(2), 149-158.

18.

Han, Sung H., Myung H. Yun, Kwang J. Kim, and Jiyoung Kwahk (2000), “Evaluation of Product Usability: Development and Validation of Usability Dimensions and Design Elements Based on Empirical Models,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 26, 477-488.

19.

Herzenstein, Michal, Steven S. Posavac, and J. Jośko Brakus (2007), “Adoption of New and Really New Products: The Effects of Self-Regulation Systems and Risk Salience,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 251-260.

20.

Higgins, E. Tory (1997), “Beyond Pleasure and Pain.” American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.

21.

Higgins, E. Tory, Scott Spiegel, Eric J. Johnson, and Raghu Iyengar (2003), “Self-Regulation Influences in Risky Choice,” paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Consumer Research, Toronto (October 8-10).

22.

Huffman, Cynthia, S. Ratneshwar, and David G. Mick (2000), “Consumer Goal Structures and Goal Determination Processes,” in The Why of Consumption: Contemporary Perspectives on Consumer Motives, Goals and Desires, S. Ratneshwar, David Glen Mick, and Cynthia Huffman, eds. New York: Routledge, 9-35.

23.

Kluger, Avraham M., Ilan Yaniv, and Anton Kűhberger (2000), “Needs, Self-Regulation, and Risk Preference,” working paper, Jerusalem School of Business Administration, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.

24.

Kohli Chiranjeev (1999), “Signaling New Product Introductions: A Framework Explaining the Timing of Preannouncements,” Journal of Business Research, 46(1), 45-56.

25.

Lee, Angela Y., and Jennifer L. Aaker (2004), “Bringing the Frame into Focus: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205-218.

26.

Lee, Angela Y., Punam A. Keller, and Brain Sternthal (2010), “Value from Regulatory Construal Fit: The Persuasive Impact of Fit between Consumer Goals and Message Concreteness,” Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 735-747.

27.

Liberman, Nira, Lorraine C. Idson, Christopher J. Camacho, and E. Tory Higgins (1999), “Promotion and Prevention Choices Between Stability and Change,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1135-1145.

28.

Lilly, Bryan and Rockney Walters (1997). “Toward a Model of New Product Preannouncement Timing,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(1), 4-20.

29.

McLaughlin, Janice and David Skinner (2000), “Developing Usability and Utility: A Comparative Study of the Users of New IT,”Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 12(3), 413-23.

30.

Mick, David G. and Susan Fournier (1998), “Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizances, Emotions, and Coping Strategies,”Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 123-143.

31.

Mukherjee, Ashesh and Wayne D. Hoyer (2001), “The Effect of Novel Attributes on Product Evaluation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 462-472.

32.

Nielsen, Jacob, and Jonathan Levy (1994), “Measuring Usability: Preference vs. Performance,” Communications of the ACM, 37(4).

33.

Olson, Jerry C. and Thomas J. Reynolds (1983), “Understanding Consumers' Cognitive Structures: Implications for Advertising Strategy,” in Advertising and Consumer Psychology, L. Percy and A. G. Woodside, eds. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 77-90.

34.

Porter. Michael E. (1980), Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free Press.

35.

Ram, Sundaresan and Jagdish N. Sheth (1989), “Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and Its Solutions,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(2), 5-14.

36.

Shackel, Brian (1984) “The Concept of Usability,”In: Bennet, J., Case, D., Sandelin, J., Smith, M. (Eds.), Visual Display Terminals. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 45-87.

37.

Srinivasan, V., William S. Lovejoy, and David Beach (1997), “Integrated Product Design for Marketability and Manufacturing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1) 154-163.

38.

Swaminathan, Vanitha, Karen L. Page, and Zeynep Gürhan-Canli (2007), “My Brand or Our Brand: The Effects of Brand Relationship Dimensions and Self-Construal on Brand Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 248-259.

39.

Thompson, Debora V., Rebecca W. Hamilton, and Roland T. Rust (2005), “Feature Fatigue:When Product Capabilities Become Too Much of a Good Thing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 431-442.

40.

Trope, Yaacov and Nira Liberman (2003), “Temporal Construal,” Psychological Review, 110(3) 403-421.

41.

Werth, Lioba and Jens Főrster (2007), “The Effects of Regulatory Focus on Braking Speed,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(12), 2764-2787.

42.

Wright, Peter and Barton Weitz (1977), “Time Horizon Effects on Product Evaluation Strategies,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14(4), 429-443.

43.

Ziamou, Lilia and Robert W. Veryzer (2005), “The Influence of Temporal Distance on Consumer Preferences for Technology-Based Innovations,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(4), 336-346.

logo