바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of School Psychology

메뉴

The Constructs of the Marlowe Crowne 13 Items Social Desirability Scale in Korean Adolescence

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the constructs of 13 items Marlowe-Crowne social desirability(SD) scale in korean adolescence. 507 adolescent students conducted this scale with a confidence inventory and self-rated daily life satisfaction scale. The results showed 1 factor model was superior to 2 factors model which assumed self-deception and other-deception(impression management) in confirmatory factor analysis with AMOS 7.0. SD showed significant correlation with confidence . 19, and daily satisfaction .23 on each. Adolescents who scored upper 3% SD score showed higher results in confidence and daily satisfaction significantly compared to the other 97% students. It means MC-13 SD score had somewhat different interpretation in relation to positive personality traits or response bias tendency. It showed the meaning of SD were changeable with its' measurement devices. If the SD scale have few items and somewhat nonobvious item contents, it would be likely to show 1 factor construct compared to the SD scales have a few items and more obvious items. Lastly we discussed the limits of this study and the suggestions for facilitating more studies for the SD.

keywords
사회적 바람직성, Marlowe-Crowne, 긍정적 성격특성, 응답 편향, social desirability, Marlowe-Crowne, positive personality traits, response bias

Reference

1.

김용석, 전수미, 이평순 (2008). 한국어판 사회적 바람직성척도의 신뢰도와 타당도 평가-가정폭력 가해 남성을 대상으로-. 사회복지연구, 38, 5-32.

2.

김재은 (1998). 심리검사의 활용. 서울: 중앙적성출판사; 45.

3.

박중규 (1999). 아동의 방해적 문제행동에 대한 인지-행동적 부모훈련과 행동적 부모훈련의 치료효과 비교. 연세대학교 박사학위 청구논문.

4.

박중규 (2002). 청소년용 사회적 바람직성 척도개발을 위한 예비 연구, 인제의학, 23(4), 493-500.

5.

정보라 (2005). 사회적 바람직성의 구인 탐색. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

6.

홍대우 (2008). 청소년 웰니스 척도 개발 및 웰니스 프로그램의 효과. 경북대학교 박사학위 청구논문.

7.

Bell, K. M., & A. E. Naugle. (2007). Effects of social desirability on students self-reporting of partner abuse perpetration and victimization. Violence and Victims, 22(2), 243-256.

8.

Brody, S., Wagnera, D., Heinrichsb, M., Jamesec, A., Hellhammera, D., & Ehlertb, U. (2000). Social desirability scores are associated with higher morning cortisol levels in firefighters. Journal of Psychosomatic research, 49, 227-228.

9.

Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 24, 349-454.

10.

Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

11.

Furnham, A., Petrides, K. V., Sarah Spencer -Bowdage. (2002). The effects of different types of social desirability on the identification of repressors. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 119-130.

12.

Helmes, E., & Holdne, R. R. (2003). The construct of social desirability: one or two dimensions? Personality and Individual Differences; in press.

13.

Johnson, T., & M. Fendrich. (2005). Modeling sources of self-report bias in a survey of drug use epidemiology. Annual Epidemiology, 15, 381-389.

14.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1983). Social desirability scales: more substance than style. Journal Con Clinical Psychology, 51, 882-888.

15.

Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: a review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263-80.

16.

Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.

17.

Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver., & L. S. Wrightsman. (Eds.). Measurement of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes(pp.17-59). New York: Academic Press.

18.

Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The revolution of a Construct In H. I. Braum, D. N. Jackson, & D. E. Wiley. (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement(pp.49-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

19.

Reber. (1995). Dictionary of Psychology. (2nd Eds.). Penguin: London; p.730-731.

20.

Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119-125.

21.

Sackeim, H. A., & Gur, R. (1978). Self-deception, self-confrontation, and consciousness. In G.E. Schwartz, & D. Sharirom. (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: advances in research, Vol 2, New York: Plenum: p.139-197.

22.

Scheier, C. A., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectations. Heath Psychology, 4, 219-247.

23.

Stober, J. (2001). The social desirability scale-17 (SDS-17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 222-232.

24.

Sugarman, D. B., & G. T. Hotaling. (1997). Intimate violence and social desirability: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(2), 275-290.

25.

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social-psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.

Korean Journal of School Psychology