바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

치면열구전색치아의 미세누출 평가를 위한 Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography의 타당도 평가

Evaluation of sealant microleakage using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) for detecting sealant microleakage. Materials and Methods: A total of 31 extracted sound human molar, assigned as suitable for sealant application, were chosen and divided into two groups: (1) no microleakage group and (2) microleakage group by applying sealant using the different methods. All specimens were immersed in 1% methylene blue for 24 h and sectioned to confirm the absence or presence of sealant microleakage as a gold standard method. Subsequently, all the sectioned specimens were digitally photographed using a microscope with a magnification of 50. Presence of microleakage was evaluated on a 2-point rating scale. The association of histological method with conventional methods (visual and tactile assessment) and SS-OCT was assessed using a chi-squared test. The intra- and inter-examiner reliability was calculated using Cohen’s Kappa. Results: The SS-OCT showed a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specificity of 1.00, while visual and tactile assessment showed a sensitivity of 0.67 and a specificity of 0.86. The inter-examiner reliability of SS-OCT was 0.79, whereas that of the visual and tactile assessment was 0.53. Conclusions: SS-OCT can be used to non-invasively detect sealant microleakage and to monitor pit and fissure sealant in the clinics.

keywords
Swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), Pit and fissure sealant, Microleakage

참고문헌

1.

Cueto EI, Buonocore MG. Sealing of pits and fissures with an adhesive resin: its use in caries prevention. J Am Dent Assoc 1967;75(1):121-128

2.

Kidd EA. Microleakage in relation to amalgam and composite restorations. A laboratory study. Br Dent J 1976;141(10):305-310

3.

Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations:a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc 1972;84(6):1349-1357

4.

Futatsuki M, Kubota K, Yeh YC, et al. Early loss of pit and fissure sealant: a clinical and SEM study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1995;19(2):99-104

5.

Feigal RJ. Sealants and preventive restorations:review of effectiveness and clinical changes for improvement. Pediatr Dent 1998;20(2):85-92

6.

이상호. 치면열구전색술. 대한치과의사협회지2011;49(1):22-32

7.

Antonson SA, Antonson DE, Brener S, et al. Twentyfour month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143(2):115-122

8.

Guler C, Yilmaz Y. A two-year clinical evaluation of glass ionomer and ormocer based fissure sealants. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2013;37(3):263-267

9.

Unal M, Oznurhan F, Kapdan A, Durer S. A comparative clinical study of three fissure sealants on primary teeth: 24-month results. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;39(2):113-119

10.

이상호. 치면열구전색의 유지력. 대한소아치과학회지 2006;33(2):336-347

11.

Markowitz K, Rosenfeld D, Peikes D, et al. Effect of pit and fissure sealants on caries detection by a fluorescent camera system. J Dent 2013;41(7):590-599

12.

Sonmez IS, Oba AA, Erkmen M, Ekici S. Effects of different fissure sealant applications on laser fluorescence measurements. Int J Paediatr Dent 2011;21(1):29-34

13.

Chen X, Cuijpers V, Fan M, Frencken J. Marginal leakage of two newer glass-ionomer-based sealant materials assessed using micro-CT. journal of dentistry 2010;38(9):731-735

14.

Feldchtein F, Gelikonov V, Iksanov R, et al. In vivo OCT imaging of hard and soft tissue of the oral cavity. Opt Express 1998;3(6):239-250

15.

Wang XJ, Milner TE, de Boer JF, et al. Characterization of dentin and enamel by use of optical coherence tomography. Appl Opt 1999;38(10):2092-2096

16.

Otis LL, Everett MJ, Sathyam US, Colston BW, Jr. Optical coherence tomography: a new imaging technology for dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131(4):511-514

17.

Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991;254(5035):1178-1181

18.

Fercher AF. Optical coherence tomography -principles and applications. Reports on progress in physics 2003;66(2):239-303

19.

Oancea R, Bradu A, Sinescu C, et al. Assessment of the sealant/tooth interface using optical coherence tomography. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 2015;29(1):49-58

20.

Bakhsh TA, Sadr A, Shimada Y, et al. Noninvasive quantification of resin?dentin interfacial gaps using optical coherence tomography:validation against confocal microscopy. dental materials 2011;27(9):915-925

21.

Hevinga MA, Opdam NJ, Frencken JE, et al. Microleakage and sealant penetration in contaminated carious fissures. J Dent 2007;35(12):909-914

22.

Ovrebo RC, Raadal M. Microleakage in fissures sealed with resin or glass ionomer cement. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98(1):66-69

23.

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics 1977:159-174

24.

Ito S, Shimada Y, Sadr A, et al. Assessment of occlusal fissure depth and sealant penetration using optical coherence tomography. Dental materials journal 2016;35(3):432-439

25.

Celiberti P, Lussi A. Penetration ability and microleakage of a fissure sealant applied on artificial and natural enamel fissure caries. Journal of dentistry 2007;35(1):59-67

26.

Ishibashi K, Ozawa N, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Sweptsource optical coherence tomography as a new tool to evaluate defects of resin-based composite restorations. J Dent 2011;39(8):543-548

27.

Imai K, Shimada Y, Sadr A, et al. Noninvasive cross-sectional visualization of enamel cracks by optical coherence tomography in vitro. J Endod 2012;38(9):1269-1274

28.

Holtzman JS, Osann K, Pharar J, et al. Ability of optical coherence tomography to detect caries beneath commonly used dental sealants. Lasers Surg Med 2010;42(8):752-759

logo