바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

DC/TMD에 기반한 턱관절 장애의 영상 진단

Imaging diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders based on DC/TMD

Abstract

Proper diagnosis and management of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is essential. For this purpose, clinical examination as well as imaging examination of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), surrounding structures, and masticatory muscles are required. Confirmation of diagnosis by imaging prevents delay in diagnosis and prevents chronic progression of TMD signs and symptoms. TMJ can be imaged using a variety of modalities, including conventional radiography represented by panoramic radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), cone-beam CT (CBCT), and bone scans. The present study briefly explains the characteristics and indications of the imaging modalities used in the diagnosis of TMD according to the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD), and presents representative images. However, imaging of TMJ can be challenging due to the anatomical complexity of the TMJ area. The use of panoramic radiography for pathological changes in the TMJ area is not enough due to overlapping of anatomical structures. With CT and CBCT, bony changes can be better identified. A three-dimensional image view is required for an accurate imaging diagnosis of TMJ. CBCT provides a high-resolution multiplanar reconstruction of the TMJ with low radiation dose without overlap of bone structures. Furthermore, MRI is a non-invasive dynamic imaging modality that is considered the gold standard for imaging the soft tissue components of the TMJ. MRI can be useful in evaluating the position and shape of the articular disc, and diagnosing TMJ disc displacement. It can also determine the early signs of TMD and the presence of joint effusion. Bone scans show whether bone changes and inflammatory reactions observed on other imaging modalities are active. The diagnostic value of imaging depends to a large extent on the equipment used and the experience of the examiner. It is recommended that the results of imaging examination be interpreted in conjunction with those of clinical examination. The information presented here is of great help to clinicians and researchers who are treating and studying TMD.

keywords
‌temporomandibular disorders, temporomandibular joint, cone-beam computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, panoramic radiography, bone scan

참고문헌

1.

1. Sipilä, K. et al. Association of clinical findings of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) with self-reported musculoskeletal pains. Eur J Pain 15, 1061-1067, doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.05.001 (2011).

2.

2. Gui, M. S., Pimentel, M. J. & Rizzatti-Barbosa, C. M. Temporomandibular disorders in fibromyalgia syndrome: a short-communication. Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition) 55, 189-194, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbre.2014.07.004 (2015).

3.

3. Calixtre, L. B. et al. Effectiveness of mobilisation of the upper cervical region and craniocervical flexor training on orofacial pain, mandibular function and headache in women with TMD. A randomised, controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil 46, 109-119, doi:10.1111/joor.12733 (2019).

4.

4. Lee, Y.-H., Lee, K. M., Kim, T. & Hong, J.-P. Psychological Factors that Influence Decision-Making Regarding Trauma-Related Pain in Adolescents with Temporomandibular Disorder. Scientific Reports 9, 18728, doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55274-9 (2019).

5.

5. Lee, Y.-H., Lee, K. M., Auh, Q. S. & Hong, J.-P. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Prediction of the Relationship between Whiplash Injury and Temporomandibular Disorders. Front Neurol 8, 725-725, doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00725 (2018).

6.

6. Østensjø, V., Moen, K., Storesund, T. & Rosén, A. Prevalence of Painful Temporomandibular Disorders and Correlation to Lifestyle Factors among Adolescents in Norway. Pain Research and Management 2017, 2164825, doi:10.1155/2017/2164825 (2017).

7.

7. Ohrbach, R. et al. Clinical findings and pain symptoms as potential risk factors for chronic TMD: descriptive data and empirically identified domains from the OPPERA case-control study. J Pain 12, T27-T45, doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2011.09.001 (2011).

8.

8. Schiffman, E. et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 28, 6-27, doi:10.11607/jop.1151 (2014).

9.

9. Ahmad, M. et al. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD): development of image analysis criteria and examiner reliability for image analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107, 844-860, doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.023 (2009).

10.

10. Parikh, R., Mathai, A., Parikh, S., Chandra Sekhar, G. & Thomas, R. Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian J Ophthalmol 56, 45-50, doi:10.4103/0301-4738.37595 (2008).

11.

11. Ishak, M. H. et al. Panoramic radiography in evaluating the relationship of mandibular canal and impacted third molars in comparison with cone-beam computed tomography. Mymensingh Med J 23, 781-786 (2014).

12.

12. Lee, Y. H., Hong, I. K. & Chun, Y. H. Prediction of painful temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis in juvenile patients using bone scintigraphy. Clin Exp Dent Res 5, 225-235, doi:10.1002/cre2.175 (2019).

13.

13. Tsai, C.-M., Wu, F.-Y., Chai, J.-W., Chen, M.-H. & Kao, C.-T. The advantage of cone-beam computerized tomography over panoramic radiography and temporomandibular joint quadruple radiography in assessing temporomandibular joint osseous degenerative changes. Journal of Dental Sciences 15, 153-162, doi:https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.03.004 (2020).

14.

14. Kalladka, M. et al. Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: diagnosis and long-term conservative management: a topic review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 14, 6-15, doi:10.1007/s13191-013-0321-3 (2014).

15.

15. Lee, Y.-H. et al. Emerging Potential of Exosomes in Regenerative Medicine for Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis. Int J Mol Sci 21, 1541, doi:10.3390/ijms21041541 (2020).

16.

16. Ibi, M. Inflammation and Temporomandibular Joint Derangement. Biol Pharm Bull 42, 538-542, doi:10.1248/bpb.b18-00442 (2019).

17.

17. Ferrazzo, K. L., Osório, L. B. & Ferrazzo, V. A. CT Images of a Severe TMJ Osteoarthritis and Differential Diagnosis with Other Joint Disorders. Case Rep Dent 2013, 242685-242685, doi:10.1155/2013/242685 (2013).

18.

18. Shetty, U. S., Burde, K. N., Naikmasur, V. G. & Sattur, A. P. Assessment of condylar changes in patients with temporomandibular joint pain using digital volumetric tomography. Radiol Res Pract 2014, 106059-106059, doi:10.1155/2014/106059 (2014).

19.

19. dos Anjos Pontual, M. L., Freire, J. S. L., Barbosa, J. M. N., Frazão, M. A. G. & dos Anjos Pontual, A. Evaluation of bone changes in the temporomandibular joint using cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41, 24-29, doi:10.1259/dmfr/17815139 (2012).

20.

20. Lee, Y. H., Hong, I. K. & An, J. S. Anterior joint space narrowing in patients with temporomandibular disorder. J Orofac Orthop 80, 116-127, doi:10.1007/s00056-019-00172-y (2019).

21.

21. Al-Saleh, M. A. Q., Alsufyani, N. A., Saltaji, H., Jaremko, J. L. & Major, P. W. MRI and CBCT image registration of temporomandibular joint: a systematic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 45, 30-30, doi:10.1186/s40463-016-0144-4 (2016).

22.

22. Ottersen, M. K., Abrahamsson, A.-K., Larheim, T. A. & Arvidsson, L. Z. CBCT characteristics and interpretation challenges of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis in a hand osteoarthritis cohort. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 48, 20180245-20180245, doi:10.1259/dmfr.20180245 (2019).

23.

23. Lee, Y. H., Lee, K. M. & Auh, Q. S. MRI-Based Assessment of Masticatory Muscle Changes in TMD Patients after Whiplash Injury. J Clin Med 10, doi:10.3390/jcm10071404 (2021).

24.

24. Bladowska, J. et al. Are T2-weighted images more useful than T1-weighted contrast-enhanced images in assessment of postoperative sella and parasellar region? Med Sci Monit 17, MT83-MT90, doi:10.12659/msm.881966 (2011).

25.

25. Sharma, S., Gupta, D. S., Pal, U. S. & Jurel, S. K. Etiological factors of temporomandibular joint disorders. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2, 116-119, doi:10.4103/0975-5950.94463 (2011).

26.

26. Shen, P. et al. Yang’s Classification of Juvenile TMJ Anterior Disc Displacement Contributing to Treatment protocols. Scientific Reports 9, 5644, doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42081-5 (2019).

27.

27. Poluha, R. L. et al. Temporomandibular joint disc displacement with reduction: a review of mechanisms and clinical presentation. J Appl Oral Sci 27, e20180433-e20180433, doi:10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0433 (2019).

28.

28. Lee, S. H. & Yoon, H. J. The relationship between MRI findings and the relative signal intensity of retrodiscal tissue in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107, 113-115, doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.027 (2009).

29.

29. Epstein, J. B., Rea, A. & Chahal, O. The use of bone scintigraphy in temporomandibular joint disorders. Oral Dis 8, 47-53, doi:10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.10753.x (2002).

30.

30. Hughes, D. et al. Gaucher Disease in Bone: From Pathophysiology to Practice. J Bone Miner Res 34, 996-1013, doi:10.1002/jbmr.3734 (2019).

logo