바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

비파괴적 광학 장비를 이용한 치아 균열 탐지

Application of non-destructive optical devices for cracked tooth detection

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to quantify the depth of enamel cracks using Quantitative light induced fluores cence-digital (QLF-D) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), and to compare the validity of detection methods. Methods: A total of 80 extracted teeth with cracks in the coronal portion or suspected cracks were selected. First, the non destructive devices QLF-D and SS-OCT were taken, and then histological evaluation was performed. Cracks was divided into 4 types with depth of the crack: Sound, Initial crack, Moderate crack, and Dentin-enamel junction (DEJ) crack. Results: As a result of the validity of the crack depth, the SS-OCT showed the highest sensitivity for detecting initial cracks at 0.98, and the lowest sensitivity for detecting DEJ cracks at 0.70. When detected with QLF-D, the cut-off value of the maximum fluorescence loss for detecting initial cracks was 5, and showed a sensitivity and a specificity of 1.00. Conclusions: The application of SS-OCT and QLF-D in diagnosing cracked teeth will not only be effective in detecting early stage cracks, but will also help to establish an appropriate treatment plan for crack progression.

keywords
Cracked tooth, Swept source optical coherence tomography, Quantitative light induced fluorescence

참고문헌

1.

1. Cameron CE. The cracked tooth syndrome: additional findings. J Am Dent Assoc 1976;93(5):971-975.

2.

2. Hilton TJ, Funkhouser E, Ferracane JL, Gordan VV, HuffKD, Barna J, Mungia R, Marker T, Gilbert GH. Associations of types of pain with crack-level, tooth-level and patient-level characteristics in posterior teeth with visible cracks: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Dent 2018;70:67-73.

3.

3. Hilton TJ, Funkhouser E, Ferracane JL, Schultz-Robins M, Gordan VV, Bramblett BJ, Snead RM, Jr., Manning W, Remakel JR. Recommended treatment of cracked teeth: Results from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123(1):71-78.

4.

4. Kahler W. The cracked tooth conundrum: terminology, classification, diagnosis, and management. Am J Dent 2008;21(5):275-282.

5.

5. Barthel CR, Moshonov J, Shuping G, Orstavik D. Bacterial leakage versus dye leakage in obturated root canals. Int Endod J 1999;32(5):370-375.

6.

6. Ku HM, Oh YR, Lee ES, Kim E, Kim BI. Using autofluorescence to detect bacterial contamination in root fractures. J Dent 2019;86:27-32.

7.

7. de Oliveira BP, C?mara AC, Duarte DA, Gomes ASL, Heck RJ, Antonino ACD, Aguiar CM. Detection of Apical Root Cracks Using Spectral Domain and Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography. J Endod 2017;43(7):1148-1151.

8.

8. Kim JH, Eo SH, Shrestha R, Ihm JJ, Seo DG. Association between longitudinal tooth fractures and visual detection methods in diagnosis. J Dent 2020;101:103466.

9.

9. Wright HM, Jr., Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Waller J, Pashley DH. Identification of resected root-end dentinal cracks:a comparative study of transillumination and dyes. J Endod 2004;30(10):712-715.

10.

10. Layton CA, Marshall JG, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. Evaluation of cracks associated with ultrasonic root-end preparation. J Endod 1996;22(4):157-160.

11.

11. Jun MK, Ku HM, Kim E, Kim HE, Kwon HK, Kim BI. Detection and Analysis of Enamel Cracks by Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence Technology. J Endod 2016;42(3):500-504.

12.

12. Li Z, Holamoge YV, Li Z, Zaid W, Osborn ML, Ramos A, Miller JT, Li Y, Yao S, Xu J. Detection and analysis of enamel cracks by ICG-NIR fluorescence dental imaging. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2020;1475(1):52-63.

13.

13. Jun MK, Park SW, Lee ES, Kim BR, Kim BI. Diagnosis and management of cracked tooth by quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2019;26:324-326.

14.

14. Lee JY, Kim HJ, Lee ES, de Josselin de Jong E, Jung HI, Kim BI. Quantitative light-induced fluorescence as a potential tool for detection of enamel chemical composition. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2020;32:102054.

15.

15. van der Veen MH, de Josselin de Jong E. Application of quantitative light-induced fluorescence for assessing early caries lesions. Monogr Oral Sci 2000;17:144-162.

16.

16. Segarra MS, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Sumi Y, Tagami J. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Enamel Crack Behavior Using Optical Coherence Tomography. J Dent Res 2017;96(3):308-314.

17.

17. Ricucci D, Loghin S, Gon?alves LS, R??as IN, Siqueira JF, Jr. Histobacteriologic Conditions of the Apical Root Canal System and Periapical Tissues in Teeth Associated with Sinus Tracts. J Endod 2018;44(3):405-413.

18.

18. Imai K, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Sumi Y, Tagami J. Noninvasive crosssectional visualization of enamel cracks by optical coherence tomography in vitro. J Endod 2012;38(9):1269-1274.

19.

19. Hariri I, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Effects of structural orientation of enamel and dentine on light attenuation and local refractive index: an optical coherence tomography study. J Dent 2012;40(5):387-396.

logo