바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

Korea Journal

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343
  • A&HCI, SCOPUS, KCI

The Formation and Transformation of the Concept of the Modern "Individual" in Korea

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2005, v.45 no.3, pp.160-128
박주원 (이화여자대학교)

Abstract

This paper focuses on texts by the enlightenment group that actively introduced and accepted the concept of Western liberalism between 1895 and 1905, the year that when Korea began to loset its national sovereignty. Based on these texts, the paper explores how the concept of the individual that was represented in the as modern in Korean modernity was changed and transformed in each period, and examines the different meanings of this concept. Of the terms that were most widely used at the time such as people, commoners, and the self, the term people was used as a general and abstract term, or as the only sole object of enlightenment. But it was in fact the term individual that contained a substantial meaning. The rights of the individual essentially meant the rights to protect his or her own body and property. In Korea, the concept of a modern nation (gungmin) was unable to be born failed to appear, and after 1905 the term minjok officially took its placereplaced this empty space. In the meantimewhile, the birth of the concealed yet stable individual was lay behind these terms.In this paper, the individual and modern people are not seen as points along a linear continuation continuum but are rather mutually exclusive. In the process of its formation and transformation, the notion of the individual does not necessarily conflict or is incompatible with the notion of state, but requires and constitutes the notion of state for the protection of the individual rights of life and property. Therefore, while the concepts of the individual and the people in the formation of Korean modernity did not always have an affinity for each one another, the concepts of the individual and the state were not necessarily exclusive.

keywords
modern Korea, modernity, individual, people, state, liberalism, modern Korea, modernity, individual, people, state, liberalism

참고문헌

1.

Bak, Chan-seung, (2002Summer) 20segi hanguk gukgajuui-ui giwon (The Origin of Statism in Korea in the 20th Century),

2.

Bak, (1988) Comparative Study of the Political Thought between Yu Gil-jun and Fukuzawa Yukichi, Hongik University

3.

Bak, Myeong-gyu, (2001) Hanmal sahoe gaenyeom-ui suyong-gwa geu uimi chegye (On the Acceptance of the Concept of Society and Its System of Meaning in the Late Great Han Empire Period),

4.

Bishop, Isabella, (2000) Joseon-gwa geu iut nara-deul, Korea and Her Neighbors , Seoul: Jipmoondang, Kegan Paul

5.

Cha, Seon-hye, (1996) Daehan jegukgi gyeongchal jeodo-ui byeonhwa-wa seonggyeok (Transformations of the Police System and Its Characteristics in the Great Han Empire Period),

6.

Choe, (1981) On the Press Law in the Gwangmu Era Journal of History,

7.

(1991) On the Newspapers in the Great Han Empire Period,

8.

Choe, (1997) Hanguk geundae gyemong undong yeongu (A Study of the Modern Enlightenment Movements in Korea), Hanguk beophaksa (History of Law in Korea), Seoul: Ilchokak, Seoul: Pak Young Sa

9.

Cicero, (1928) Translated by Clinton Walker Keyes, Harvard Univ Press

10.

De Bary, William Theodore, (1998) Jungguk-ui jayu jeontong, The Liberal Tradition in China , Seoul: Yeesan

11.

Jeon,Bok-hui, (1996) Sahoe jinhwaron-gwa gukga sasangguhanmal-eul jungsim-euro (Social Darwinism and Ideas on of the StateFocusing on the Late Great Han Empire Period), Seoul: Hanul Academy

12.

Jeong, Yong-hwa, (2000) Yugyo-wa jayujuui (Confucianism and Liberalism),

13.

Jin, (1983&1984) The Power Structure of the Great Han Empire Seen from the Political History Study of the Great Han Empire,

14.

Ju, Introduction on Law,

15.

Kim, Byeong-gon, (1996) Jayujuui-wa soyugwon sasang (Liberalism and Ideas on of Proprietary Rights), Sahoe bipyeong (Critical Review of Society),

16.

Kim,Dong-chun, (1996) Hanguk-ui geundae-wa geundaeseong bipan (Criticism on of the Modern and Modernity in Korea), Seoul: The Institute for Korean Historical Studies

17.

Kim, Dong-taek, (2000) 19segi mal geundae gukga geonseol gwajeong-eseo natanan jeongchijeok gyunyeol: gabo gaehyeok-gwa gwangmu gaehyeok-eul jungsim-euro (Political Ruptures Appeared in the Process of Modern Nation-State Building in the Late Nineteenth Century: With Focus on the Gabo and Gwangmu Reforms),

18.

Kim, Ju-seong, (2000) Kim Ok-gyun, Bak Yeong-hyo-ui jayujuui jeongsin (The Liberal Spirit of Kim Ok-gyun and Bak Yeong-hyo),

19.

Kim, Hak-jun, (2000) Hanmal-ui seoyang jeongchihak suyong yeongu: Yu Gil-jun, An Guk-seon, Yi Seung-man-eul jungsim-euro (On the Acceptance of the Western Political Science in the Late Great Han Empire: Centering on Yu Gil-jun, An Guk-seon, and Syngman Rhee), Seoul National University Press

20.

Kim, Hyo-jeon, (1996) Seoyang heonbeop iron-ui chogi suyong (The Early Acceptance of the Theory of Western Constitution), Seoul: Chul Hak Gua Hyun Sil Sa

21.

(2000) Geundae hanguk-ui gukga sasang (Idea ofn the State in Modern Korea), Seoul: Chul Hak Gua Hyun Sil Sa

22.

Kim, (1984) Study of the Nationalism in the Late Great Han Empire,

23.

Maruyama, Masao, (2000) Beonyeok-gwa ilbon-ui geundae (Translation and the Modern in Japan),

24.

Seo, Jin-gyo, (1996) 1899nyeon gojong-ui daehanguk gukje banpo-wa jeonje hwangjegwon-ui chugu (Proclamation of the Constitution of the Great Han Empire in 1899 and the Pursuit of the Absolute Imperial Authority),

25.

Seo, Yeong-hui, (1997) Gwangmu jeonggwon-ui hyeongseong-gwa gaehyeok jeongchaek chujin (Establishment of the Gwangmu Era and the Drive for Its Reform Policies),

26.

(2003) Daehan jeguk jeongchisa yeongu (On the Political History in during the Great Han Empire), Seoul National University Press

27.

Wallerstein, Immanuel, (1996) Jayujuui ihu, After Liberalism , Seoul: Dangdae, New York: New Press

28.

Yi, Gwang-rin, (1982) Introduction of the Elements of International Law to Korea and Its Influence,

29.

Yi, Hong-gu, (1986) The 100 Years of the Modern Korean Political Science Reflectxion for Overcoming Its Limitations Bulletin of the Korean Political Science Association,

30.

Yi, Jong-eun, (2002May) Yu Gil-jun-ege isseoseoui gaein-iraneun gaenyeom (The Concept of the Individual to Yu Gil-jun), first joint meeting of the Korean Society of Political Thought and the Japanese Society of Political Thought, Seoul

31.

Yi, Na-mi, (2000) Dongnip sinmun-e natanan jayujuui sasang-e gwanhan yeongu (Study of the Liberal Thought Appeared in The Independent),

32.

Yi, Seung-hwan, (2002) Hanguk mit dongyang-ui gongsagwan-gwa geundaejeok byeonyong (The Concept of Public/Private in Korea and East Asia and Its Modern Transformations),

33.

Yu, (1895) Observations on a Journey to the West,

34.

Yu Gil-jun jeonseo, (1971) Complete Works of Yu Gil-jun,

35.

Han Seok-tae, (1998) Jeongchihak (Political Science), Kyungnam University Press

36.

Yu,Seong-jun, (1907/1981) Beophak tongnon(Introduction on to Law, The Asian Culture Press

37.

Yun, (1987) Theory of the Constitutional Monarchy of Yu Gil-jun Focusing on the Unfinished Manuscript,

Korea Journal