바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 0023-3900

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.57 No.3
Citation Share

Public Diplomacy: Reappraising the South Korean Case through an Evolutionary Approach

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2017, v.57 no.3, pp.83-111
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2017.57.3.83
Muzaffar S. ABDUAZIMOV (Public sector)
Muzaffar, S. A. (2017). Public Diplomacy: Reappraising the South Korean Case through an Evolutionary Approach. Korea Journal, 57(3), 83-111, https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2017.57.3.83
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Despite a rising academic interest in South Korea’s public diplomacy, little is known about its origins and evolution. Most existing studies have focused on the modern period of South Korea’s public diplomacy, in particular the government’s new foreign policy agenda since the late 2000s. Contrary to popular belief, this article argues that the recent infiltration of public diplomacy into South Korea’s foreign policy represents de jure intensification of activities that de facto have been practiced from the second half of the 20th century. The present research divides the evolution of South Korea’s public diplomacy into four periods: origins, diversification, polycentrism, and institutionalization. Each period has its own specific patterns, ends, and means. For instance, whereas the origins period arose with cultural and sports diplomacies, diversification included specific areas of engagement with foreign publics through official development assistance, knowledge, and exchange diplomacies. In turn, polycentrism has structurally transformed public diplomacy from a solely state-led activity into a polycentric framework of public and private partnership. Lastly, the institutionalization period represents the government’s recent efforts to establish a universal coordinative authority above its public diplomacy, which represents a fragmented set of activities conducted by various governmental institutions.

keywords
public diplomacy, soft power, origins, diversification, polycentrism, in - stitutionalization

Reference

1.

Armstrong, Matthew C. 2009. “Operationalizing Public Diplomacy.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, edited by Nancy Snow and Philip M. Taylor, 63–71. London: Routledge.

2.

Cairncross, Frances. 1997. The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Is Changing Our Lives. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

3.

Cho, Hae-Joang. 2005. “Reading the ‘Korean Wave’ as a Sign of Global Shift.” Korea Journal 45.4: 147–182.

4.

Cho, Yun Young. 2012. “Public Diplomacy and South Korea’s Strategies.” Korean Journal of International Studies 10.2: 275–296.

5.

CIDC (Committee for International Development Cooperation). 2014. Korea’s Official Development Assistance White Paper 2014. Sejong: CIDC.

6.

Cowan, Geoffrey, and Amelia Arsenault. 2008. “Moving From Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration: The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (March): 10–30.

7.

Cull, Nicholas J. 2008. “Public Diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (March): 31–54.

8.

Cull, Nicholas J. 2009. “Public Diplomacy before Gullion: The Evolution of a Phrase.”In Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, edited by Nancy Snow and Philip M. Taylor, 19–23. London: Routledge.

9.

Dal, Yong Jin. 2012. “Hallyu 2.0: The New Korean Wave in Creative Industry.” International Institute Journal 2.1: 3–7.

10.

De Ceuster, Koen. 2005. “Pride and Prejudice in South Korea’s Foreign Policy.”Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 21: 64–90.

11.

d’Hooghe, Ingrid. 2015. China’s Public Diplomacy. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.

12.

Duffield, John S. 2007. “What Are International Institutions?” International Studies Review 9.1: 1–22.

13.

Fardoust, Shahrokh, Yongbeom Kim, and Claudia Sepúlveda. 2011. “Postcrisis Growth and Development: A Development Agenda for the G-20: Overview.”In Postcrisis Growth and Development: A Development Agenda for the G-20, edited by Shahrokh Fardoust, Yongbeom Kim, and Claudia Sepúlveda, 1–62. Washington: World Bank.

14.

Gregory, Bruce. 2011. “American Public Diplomacy: Enduring Characteristics, Elusive Transformation.” Hague Journal of Diplomacy 6.3/4: 351–372.

15.

Heller, Ken S., and Liza M. Persson. 2009. “The Distinction between Public Affairs and Public Diplomacy.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, edited by Nancy Snow and Philip M. Taylor, 225–232. London: Routledge.

16.

Hermanns, Heike. 2013. “National Role Conceptions in the ‘Global Korea’ Foreign Policy Strategy.” Korean Journal of International Studies 11.1: 55–82.

17.

Hong, Kiwon. 2014. “Nation Branding of Korea.” In Cultural Policies in East Asia:Dynamics between the State, Arts and Creative Industries, edited by Hye-Kyung Lee and Lorraine Lim, 69–84. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

18.

House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee. 2011. FCO Public Diplomacy: The Olympic and Paralympic Games 2012. London: Foreign Affairs Committee.

19.

Jang, Gunjoo, and Won K. Paik. 2012. “Korean Wave as Tool for Korea’s New Cultural Diplomacy.” Advances in Applied Sociology 2.3: 196–202.

20.

Kalinowski, Thomas, and Hyekyung Cho. 2012. “Korea’s Search for a Global Role between Hard Economic Interests and Soft Power.” European Journal of Development Research 24.2: 242–260.

21.

Kelley, John R. 2009. “Between ‘Take-offs’ and ‘Crash Landings’: Situational Aspects of Public Diplomacy.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, edited by Nancy Snow and Philip M. Taylor, 72–85. London: Routledge.

22.

Kelley, John R..12015. “Non-State Actors.” The Public Diplomacy Council. Last modified January 25, 2015. http://www.publicdiplomacycouncil.org/commentaries/01-25-15/non-state-actors.

23.

Kinsey, Dennis F., and Myojung Chung. 2013. “National Image of South Korea:Implications for Public Diplomacy.” Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy 4.1: 1–12.

24.

Kim, Eun Mee, and Jiwon Ryoo. 2007. “South Korean Culture Goes Global: K-Pop and the Korean Wave.” Korean Social Science Journal 34.1: 117–152.

25.

Kim, Regina. 2011. “Searchers and Planners: South Korea’s Two Approaches to Nation Branding.” In 2010 SAIS U.S.-Korea Yearbook, edited by SAIS, 147–162. Washington, DC: U.S.-Korea Institute at SAIS.

26.

Kim, Sung-han. 2012. “Global Korea: Broadening Korea’s Diplomatic Horizons.” Accessed August 7, 2017. https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/120727_KimSunghan_GlobalKorea.pdf.

27.

Kim, Taehwan. 2012. “Paradigm Shift in Diplomacy: A Conceptual Model for Korea’s ‘New Public Diplomacy.’” Korea Observer 43.4: 527–555.

28.

KF (Korea Foundation). 2013a. KF Brochure. Seoul: Korea Foundation.

29.

KF (Korea Foundation). 12013b. “The Sixth KF Global Seminar: Korea’s Role in Global Public Diplomacy.” You Tube video, 35:28. Posted December 2, 2013. https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=BEEMpkc1hKY.

30.

KF (Korea Foundation). 12013c. “Who We Are.” Accessed January 13, 2017. http://en.kf.or.kr/? menuno=3774.

31.

KF (Korea Foundation). 12014. 2014 Annual Report of the Korea Foundation. Seoul: KF.

32.

KF (Korea Foundation). 12015. 2015 Annual Report of the Korea Foundation. Seoul: KF.

33.

KCCI (Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry). 2012. “Survey on Economic Effect of Korean Wave and Its Utilization of Korean Enterprises.” Pulse, April 9. http://pulsenews.co.kr/view.php?year=2012&no=218604.

34.

KOICA (Korea International Cooperation Agency). 2011. 1991–2010: 20 Years of KOICA. Seongnam: KOICA.

35.

KITA (Korea International Trade Association). 2011. “’Korean Wave’ Shows a Way to ‘Export’.” Last modified November 22, 2011. http://www.kita.org/about/newsView.do?id=&no=914&searchWrd=&result_url=.

36.

KTO (Korea Tourism Organization). 2015. “Visitor Arrivals, Korean Departures, Int’l Tourism Receipts & Expenditures.” Accessed January 17, 2017. http://kto.visitkorea.or.kr/eng/tourismStatics/keyFacts/visitorArrivals.kto.

37.

Larson, James F., and Nancy K. Rivenburgh. 1989. “Televised Constructions of the Seoul Olympic Ceremony in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.” Accessed June 22, 2016. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED313732.pdf.

38.

Lee, Yun-Taek. 2002. “World Cup 2002: Korea and Japan Partnering for the 21st Century.” Harvard Asia Pacific Review 6.1: 66–69.

39.

Lee, Sook-jong. 2011. “South Korean Soft Power and How South Korea Views the Soft Power of Others.” In Public Diplomacy and Soft Power in East Asia, edited by Sook Jong Lee and Jan Melissen, 139–161. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

40.

Lee, Sook-jong.12012. South Korea as New Middle Power Seeking Complex Diplomacy. Seoul: East Asia Institute.

41.

Lee, Sook-jong. 2015a. “Korea’s Public Diplomacy Needs Better Coordination and Strategies.” Korea Focus, January 13. http://www.koreafocus.or.kr/DEV/politics/view.asp?volume_id=162&content_id=105736&category=A.

42.

Lee, Sook-jong.12015b. “South Korea’s Middle Power Activism and the Retooling of Its Public Diplomacy.” In Understanding Public Diplomacy in East Asia: Middle Powers in a Troubled Region, edited by Jan Melissen and Yul Sohn, 107–130. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

43.

Lee, Hye-Kyung. 2013. “Cultural Policy and the Korean Wave: From National Culture to Transnational Consumerism.” In The Korean Wave: Korean Media Go Global, edited by Youna Kim, 185–198. New York: Routledge.

44.

Leong, Melissa. 2014. “How Korea Became the World’s Coolest Brand.” Financial Post, August 2, 2014. http://business.financialpost.com/news/retail-marketing/how-korea-became-the-worlds-coolest-brand.

45.

Lim, Tania. 2008. “Renting East Asian Popular Culture for Local Television:Regional Networks of Cultural Production.” In East Asian Pop Culture: Analyzing the Korean Wave, edited by Chua Beng Huat and Koichi Iwabuchi, 33-52. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

46.

Lim, Eojin. 2016. “Understanding Transnational Korea through Hallyu: Resilience of Developmentalism in the 21st Century.” Synergy: The Journal of Contemporary Asian Studies, September 13. http://utsynergyjournal.org/2016/09/ 13/understanding-transnational-korea-through-hallyu-resilience-of-developmentalism-in-the-21st-century/.

47.

Lin, Lilian. 2014. “Korean TV Show Sparks Chicken and Beer Craze in China.” Wall Street Journal, February 26. http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/ 02/26/korean-tv-show-sparks-chicken-and-beer-craze-in-china/.

48.

Ma, Young Sam, Song Jung-he, and Dewey Moore. 2012. “Korea’s Public Diplomacy:A New Initiative for the Future.” Asan Institute for Policy Studies 39 (December):1–25.

49.

Manheim, Jarol B. 1990. “Rites of Passage: The 1988 Seoul Olympics as Public Diplomacy.” Western Political Quarterly 43.2: 279–295.

50.

Melissen, Jan. 2005. “The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice.” In The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations, edited by Jan Melissen, 3–27. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

51.

Melissen, Jan, and Yul Sohn. 2015. Leveraging Middle Power Public Diplomacy in East Asian International Relations. Seoul: East Asia Institute.

52.

MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Korea). 2014. Diplomatic White Paper 2014. Seoul: MOFA.

53.

MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Korea). 2015. “ODA/Development Cooperation.” Accessed November 13, 2015. http://www.mofa.go.kr/ENG/policy/oda/index.jsp?menu=m_20_110 2015.

54.

Nye, Joseph S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York:Public Affairs.

55.

Park, Mi Sook. 2015. “South Korea Cultural History between 1960s and 2012.”International Journal of Korean Humanities and Social Sciences 1: 171–118.

56.

Pratkanis, Anthony. 2009. “Public Diplomacy in International Conflicts: A Social Influence Analysis.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, edited by Nancy Snow and Philip M. Taylor, 111–153. London: Routledge.

57.

Rivenburgh, Nancy. 2004. The Olympic Games, Media and the Challenges of Global Image Making. Barcelona: International Chair in Olympism.

58.

Scharf, Sarah. 2016. “The Campaign to Make You Eat Kimchi.” Priceonomics. Last modified July 26, 2016. https://priceonomics.com/the-campaign-to-makeyou-eat-kimchi/.

59.

Schmuck, Alena. 2011. “Nation Branding in South Korea: A Modern Continuation of the Development State?” In Korea: Politics, Economy and Society, edited by Rüdiger Frank et al., 91–117. Leiden: Brill.

60.

Shim, Doobo. 2008. “The Growth of Korean Cultural Industries and the Korean Wave.” In East Asian Pop Culture: Analyzing the Korean Wave, edited by Chua Beng Huat and Koichi Iwabuchi, 15–32. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

61.

Snow, Nancy. 2009. “Rethinking Public Diplomacy.” In Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, edited by Nancy Snow and Philip M. Taylor, 3–11. London:Routledge.

62.

Sung, Keuk Je. 2010. “Was There an Economic Miracle in Korea?” In Development Experience of the Korean Economy, edited by Keuk Je Sung, 11–20. Seoul: Kyung Hee University Press.

63.

Szondi, Georgy. 2008. Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual Similarities and Differences. The Hague: Clingendael.

64.

Temporal, Paul. 2015. Branding for the Public Sector: Creating, Building and Managing Brands People Will Value. Cornwall: Wiley.

65.

White House. 2013. “Remarks by President Obama and President Park of South Korea in a Joint Press Conference.” Last modified May 7, 2013. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/07/remarks-president-obama-and president-park-south-korea-joint-press-confe.

66.

Watson, Iain. 2012. “South Korea’s State-led Soft Power Strategies: Limits on Inter-Korean Relations.” Asian Journal of Political Science 20.3: 304–325.

67.

Walsh, John. 2014. “Hallyu as a Government Construct: The Korean Wave in the Context of Economic and Social Development.” In The Korean Wave: Korean Popular Culture in Global Context, edited by Yasue Kuwahara, 13–32. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

68.

Yim, Haksoon. 2002. “Cultural Identity and Cultural Policy in South Korea.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 8.1: 37–48.

Korea Journal

e-Submission OA Policy