바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

Korea Journal

  • P-ISSN0023-3900
  • E-ISSN2733-9343
  • A&HCI, SCOPUS, KCI

ISSN : 0023-3900

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.59 No.3

Citation Share

Yi Hwang’s and Yi I’s Interpretations of the Taijitushuo: Focusing on Their Theories of Li-Qi

Korea Journal / Korea Journal, (P)0023-3900; (E)2733-9343
2019, v.59 no.3, pp.27-52
https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2019.59.3.27
이현선 (서울대학교)
이현선. (2019). . Korea Journal, 59(3), 27-52, https://doi.org/10.25024/kj.2019.59.3.27

Abstract

This paper aims to bring clarity to the different views on li and qi of Yi Hwang 李滉 and Yi I 李珥, more specifically following their respective interpretations of the Taijitushuo 太極圖說. While the two agreed that Zhuzixue 朱子學 should maintain its firm place as the national ideology of Joseon, they differed in their views concerning post-Zhuzixue trends in Ming China, especially concerning the thoughts of Luo Qinshun 羅欽順. Yi Hwang based his interpretation of the Taijitushuo on that of Zhu Xi, emphasizing the priority of li over qi. Yi Hwang inherited Zhu Xi’s claim that the activity-tranquility was the taiji’s function, and sought to specify what the function was in his interpretation of sheng 生. For Yi Hwang, should li be without function, it is a “dead thing” that has no capacity or role, and cannot be the foundation on which Confucian ethics are grounded. Yi I never dealt with li as the cause of qi’s movement or being; his point of emphasis was that the taiji and yin-yang, or li and qi, were inseparable; and there was no chronological priority or posteriority between the two. Unlike Zhu Xi, he refused the priority of the taiji, claiming that the taiji was within the movement of qi, which was akin to Luo’s view.

keywords
Yi Hwang, Yi I, Zhu Xi, Luo Qinshun, Taijitushuo, taiji, yin-yang, activity and tranquility (dong-jing)

참고문헌

1.

Bloom, Irene. 1987. Knowledge Painfully Acquired: The K’un-Chih Chi of Lo Ch’in-Shun. New York: Columbia University Press.

2.

Chu, Hsi (Zhu Xi) and Lü Tsu-Ch’ien. 1967. Reflections on Things at Hand: The Neo-Confucian Anthology. Translated by Wing-tsit Chan. New York: Columbia University Press.

3.

Luo, Qinshun 羅欽順. 1985. Kunzhiji 困知記 (Knowledge Painfully Acquired). Beijing: Zhonghuashuju.

4.

Yi, Hwang 李滉. 1988. Toegyejip 退溪集 (Complete Works of Toegye Yi Hwang). Translated by Kikeun Jang. Seoul: Yangudang.

5.

Yi, I 李珥. 2007. “Yulgok jeonseo 栗谷全書.” In Yulgokhak yeongu chongseo 栗谷學硏究叢書, translated by Jinyoung Lee, et al. 10 vols. Gangneung: Yulgok hakhoe.

6.

Yi, T’oegye 李退溪 (Yi Hwang 李滉). 1988. To Become a Sage: The Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning. Translated and edited by Michael C. Kalton. New York:Columbia University Press.

7.

Zhou, Dunyi 周敦頤. 1990. Zhou Dunyiji 周敦頤集 (Works of Zhou Dunyi). Beijing:Zhonghua shuju.

8.

Zhu, Xi 朱熹. 1994. Zhuzi yulei 朱子語類 (Zhu Xi’s Classified Conversations). Edited by Li Jingde 黎靖德. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.

9.

Zhu, Xi 朱熹. 2002. Zhuzi quanshu 朱子全書 (Complete Works of Zhu Xi). Shanghai:Shanghai guji chubanshe; Hefei: Anhui jiaoyu chubanshe.

10.

Adler, Joseph A. 2014. Reconstructing the Confucian Dao: Zhu Xi’s Appropriation of Zhou Dunyi. Albany: State University of New York Press.

11.

Chen, Lai 陳來. 2004. Song-Ming lixue 宋明理學 (Neo-Confucianism of the Song-Ming Period). 2nd ed. Shanghai: Huadong shifan daxue chubanshe.

12.

Chung, Edward Y. J. 1995. The Korean Neo-Confucianism of Yi T’oegye and Yi Yulgok:A Reappraisal of the “Four-Seven Thesis” and Its Practical Implications for Self-Cultivation. Albany: State University of New York Press.

13.

Jeong, Sang-bong. 2012. “Juja hyeongisanghak-ui simcheunggujo—taegeuk-e daehan ihae—” (The Deep Structure of Zhuzi’s Metaphysics—Understanding Taiji). Hanguk cheolhak nonjip (Journal of Korean Philosophy) 33: 255–278.

14.

Kim, Yung Sik. 2017. “Another Look at Yi Hwang’s Views about Li and Qi: A Case of Time-lag in the Transmission of Chinese Originals to Korea.” In Traditional Korean Philosophy: Problems and Debates, edited by Youngsun Back and Philip J. Ivanhoe, 25–67. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

15.

Korean National Commission for UNESCO, ed. 2004. Korean Philosophy: Its Tradition and Modern Transformation. Vol. 6 of Anthology of Korean Studies. Carlsbad: Hollym International Corp.

16.

Mou, Zongsan 牟宗三. 1987. Xinti yu xingti 心體與性體 (Substance of Mind and Substance of Human Nature). Taipei: Zheng Zhong.

17.

Ro, Young-chan. 1989. The Korean Neo-Confucianism of Yi Yulgok. Albany: State University of New York Press.

18.

Tu, Wei-ming. 1982. “T’oegye’s Creative Interpretation of Chu His’s Philosophy of Principle.” Korea Journal 22.2: 4–15.

19.

Youn, Sa-soon. 2017. Confucian Thought in Korea: A Study Based on the Cardinal Principles of Confucianism. Seoul: Korea University Press.

Korea Journal

논문 투고 OA 정책