바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

The Mediation Effect of Self-Concept and Defense Mechanisms on the Relationship between Early Object Relationships and Borderline Personality Traits

Abstract

This study investigated the correlation between borderline personality trait, early object relationship experience, self-concept, and defense mechanisms. For this research, 474 male and female university students were asked to answer the early object relationship scale, self-concept scale, Korea-defense style questionnaire, and Korea-personality disorder scale. Subsequently, we studied the mediating effects of self-concept and defense mechanism on the association of early object relationship experience and borderline personality traits. The results were as follows; early object relationship experience with parents accounted for 22% of borderline personalities, self-concept in a controled state where early object relationship experience was restricted contributed a further 6%, defense mechanisms in a state that those two variables was restricted accounted for 22% of the results from a hierarchical multiple regression analyses of the variables. Additionally, there was a difference in the way negative early object relationship concerning the mother and father affected borderline personalities through self-concept and defense mechanism. In particular, a negative early object relationship with the mother created borderline personalities directly or indirectly, through self-concept and immature defense mechanisms; however, only the indirect path through self-concept and immature defense mechanism was meaningful in early object relationships with the father. Further, the mediating effect of self-concept and defense mechanism, which was introduced from the path model, was significant as a result of the Sobel test. This research demonstrated that negative self-concept, immaturity, and self-restrictive defense mechanisms serve to mediate the progress in the relationship between negative early object relationships and borderline personality traits. Further, the mediating effect of these variables was variable with respect to each parent. Finally, the limitations and suggestion for further research were discussed.

keywords
early object relation, self-concept, object concept, defense mechanism, borderline personality, mediating effect, 초기대상관계, 자기개념, 방어유형, 경계선 성격, 매개효과

Reference

1.

권석만 (2002). 자기 및 타인 표상과 대인관계 문제의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 임상. 21(4), 705-726.

2.

김사훈 (1998). 대학생의 초기 대상관계와 공감능력간의 관계. 계명대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

3.

김상선, 신민섭, 이훈진 (2007). 경계선 성격장애 성향자의 자기 및 타인 표상과 지각된 부모 양육행동. 한국심리학회지: 임상. 26(3). 703-715.

4.

김순천 (1994). 가족의 경계선증후군에 대한 대상중심 가족치료. 대구대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

5.

김유심, 채준호, 박영숙 (1999). MBTI 성격유형과 이화방어기제 상관관계 연구. 한국심리유형학회지. 6(1), 67-88.

6.

김진숙, 김창대, 이지연 (2007). 대상관계 이론과 실제, 자기와 타자. 학지사; 서울

7.

김창대, 이명우 (1996). 한국 청소년의 관계유형 분류를 위한 기초 연구. 청소년 상담 연구. 4. 7-54.

8.

김창대, 김진숙, 이지연, 유성경 (2008). 대상관계이론 입문. 학지사; 서울.

9.

문성호 (2001). 대상관계에 따른 자아방어기제와 자아분화수준. 부산대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

10.

서재삼, 황순택 (2006). 한국형 성격장애 진단검사의 개발과 타당화. 한국심리학회: 임상. 25(1), 273-288.

11.

양은주, 류인균 (2000). 경계선 성격장애의 생물유전적 기질, 현상적 성격 및 방어기제적 특성과 정신병리와의 연관성 연구. 정신병리학. 9(1). 3-15.

12.

유영달 (2003). 남녀 간 정신장애 유병률 차이에 관한 소고. 여성연구논집. 14, 127-160

13.

이훈진 (1997). 편집증과 자기개념 및 귀인양식. 미발표 박사학위 청구논문. 서울대학교.

14.

조성호 (1999). 한국판 방어유형질문지 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회: 상담 및 심리치료. 11(2), 115-137.

15.

American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(4th ed.), text revision, Washington, DC. American psychiatric Association.

16.

Arnow, D. (1991). affect in early memories of borderline patients. journal of personality assessment, 56(1), 75-83.

17.

Bornstein, R. F. & O'neill, R. M. (1992) parental perception and psychopathology, journal of nervious mental disorder, 180.

18.

Boschen, M, J., & Warner, J. C. (2009). Publication trends in individual DSM personality disorders. 1971-2015. Australian Psychologist. 44(2), 136-142.

19.

Clarkin, J. F. (2006). Conceptualization and treatment of personality disorders. psychotherapy research, 16, 1-11.

20.

Clarkin, J. F., & Levy, K. N. (2006). psychotherapy for patients with borderline personality disorder: focusing on the mechanism of change. special issue of journal of clinical psychology. 62, 405-516.

21.

Clarkin, J. F., Lenzenweger, M. F., Yeomans, F., Levy, K. N. Kernberg. O. F. (2007). An object relations model of borderline pathology. journal of personality disorders, 21(5), 474-499.

22.

Fairbairn, R. (1946). Object Relations and Dynamic Structure, in Psycho Analytic Studies of the Personality.

23.

Gabbard, G. O. (2005). Psychodynamic Psychiatry in Clinical Practice. fifth Edition. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.

24.

Gacono, C. B. (1992). Object relations, defensive operations, and affective states in narcissistic, borderline, and antisocial personality disorder. journal of personality assessment, 59(1), 32-49.

25.

Greene, L. R. (1996). Primitive defenses, object relations, and symptom clusters in borderline psychopathology. journal of personality assessment. 67(2), 294-304

26.

Grilo, C. M. (2004) Two-year stability and change in schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, and obsessive-compulsive personality disorders. journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 72, 767-775.

27.

Grinker, R. R., Werble, B., & Drye, R. C. (1968). The borderline syndrome: A behavioral study of ego functions. New York: Basic Books.

28.

Johnson, J. G. (1999). childhood maltreatment increases risk for personality disorders during early adulthood. Archives of General psychiatry. 56, 600-606.

29.

Kernberg, O. F. (1967). borderline personality organization. journal of american psychoanalysis association. 15, 641-685.

30.

Kernberg, O. F. (1973). psychoanalytic object -relations theory, group processes and administration: toward an integrative theory of hospital treatment. annual of psychoanalysis 1, 363-388.

31.

Kernberg O. F. (1975). borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York, Jason Aronson.

32.

Kohut H. (1979). The Two Analysis of Mr. Z. International journal of Psychoanalysis. 60. 3-27.

33.

Links, P. S. & Mitton, J. E. & Steiner, M. (1993). stability of borderline personality disorder. canada journal of psychiatry. 38, 255-259.

34.

Looper, K. J & Paris, J, (2000). What Dimensions Underlie Cluster B personality Disorders? Comprehensive psychiatry, 41(6), 432-437.

35.

Lynum, L. I. & Wilberg, T. & Karterud, S. (2008). self-esteem in patients with borderline and avoidant personality disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(5), 469-477.

36.

MacKinnon, R. A., & Michels, R. (1971). The psychiatric interview in clinical practice. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunder.

37.

Mahler, M. S., & Pine, f., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological Birth of the Human Infant: Symbiosis and Individuation. New York, Basic Books.

38.

MacKinnon R. A., Michels, R. (1971). The Psychiatric Interview in clinical Practice. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders.

39.

Marziali, E., Munroe-Blum, H., & Links, P. (1994). Severity as a diagnostic dimension of borderline personality disorder. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 540-544.

40.

Newnan, L. & Stevenson, C. (2005). parenting and borderline personality disorder: ghosts int the nursery. Clinical Child Psychology & Psychiatry, Vol. 10(3), 385-394.

41.

Phebe, C. (1999). Personality, Personality Disorders, and Defense Mechanisms. Journal of Personality, Vol. 67(3), 535-554.

42.

Schrafft, D. E. & Fairbairn, B. E., (1997). From instinct to self: the evolution and implications of W. R. D. Fairbairn's theory of object relations. The international journal of psycho -analysis, 78(6), 1085-1104.

43.

Winnicott, D.(1963). The Development of the Capacity for Concern, in the Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment.

44.

Zanarini, Zanarini, M. C., Gunderson, J. G., Marino, M. F., Schwartz, E. O., & Frankenburg, F. R. (1989). Childhood experiences of borderline patients. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 30, 18–25.

45.

Zanarini, M. C. (1990). discriminating borderline personality disorder from other Axis Ⅱ disorders. American J Psychiatry. 147. 161-167.

46.

Zanarini, M. C. & Frankenburg, F. R. (1997). pathways to the development of borderline personality disorder. Journal of personality disorder. 11, 93-104.

47.

Zanarini, M. C. & Weingeroff, J. L., Frankenburg, F. R. (2009). defense mechani는 associated with borderline personality disorder. journal of personality disorders. 20(2), 11-121.

48.

Zodan, J. (2009). rorschach assessment of reality testing, affect and object representation of borderline pathology: A comparison of clinical samples. Bulletin of th menninger clinic, 73(2), 121-142.

logo