바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A study of Malingering Discrimination of Korean-California Verbal Learning Test: K-CVLT

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the effectiveness of Korean-California Verbal Learning Test (K-CVLT) for detecting malingering. The K-CVLT was administrated to three groups: malingering group(n=28) and effortful group(n=28) with mild traumatic brain injury which were classified according to the criteria for probable Malingering of Neurocognitive Dysfunction(MND) by Click, Sherman, and Iverson(1999), and patient group without brain injury(n=27). Comparison of the z-score and the raw score among the three groups showed that the malingering group performed significantly worse than the effortful group and the patient group without brain injury across a majority of K-CVLT variables and six composite K-CVLT malingering indicators. In contrast, no statistically significant differences between the effortful and the patient groups over all the variables of K-CVLT. Therefore, the study finalized into two groups: the malingering, and the non-malingering which includes the effortful and the patient groups. As a result, for examining the sensitivity, specificity, and classification accuracy between the malingering and the non-malingering groups, the recognition discriminability (.61), total intrusion(.54), short-delay free recall(.50), long-delay free & cued recall(.50), Millis formula(.64), and six malingering indicators(.54∼.57) by Mills & Volinsky(2001) showed good sensitivity while maintaining a specificity of at least .91. Especially, the examination had significant diagnostic validity when classified between the malingering and the non-malingering groups with recognition discriminability(≤80), total intrusion(≥14), short-delay free recall(≤4), long-delay free recall(≤5), long-delay cued recall(≤6), and Millis formula(≤.52). The clinical implications and the limitations of this study are also discussed.

keywords
Korean-California Verbal Learning Test, malingering discrimination index, mild traumatic brain injury, malingered neurocognitive dysfunction, 한국판 캘리포니아 언어학습검사(K-CVLT), 사병변별지표, 외상 후 경도 뇌손상, 사병의 신경인지적 역기능

Reference

1.

고승희 (2009). 레이 15-항목 기억검사(Rey 15-Item Memory Test)의 사병변별지표 개발 및 타당화 연구. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

2.

고승희, 이영호, 김석주, 임선영 (2008). 레이복합도형검사(Rey Complex Figure Test)의 사병변별지표에 대한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 27, 653-667.

3.

김은경, 박병관, 정영조, 신동균, 배형섭, 고병희 (1995). 벤튼신경심리검사의 임상적 활용. -질적 분석을 중심으로-. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 14, 219-234.

4.

김정기, 강연욱 (1999). K-CVLT 신경심리학적 기억검사(성인용). 서울: 도서출판 특수교육.

5.

김진아, 이현수, 박병관 (2003). 한국판 벤튼 신경심리검사(K-BNA)에서 외상성 뇌손상 환자와 사병모사 집단의 수행비교. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 22, 231-245.

6.

김홍근 (2003). K-사병진단검사 해설서. 대구: 도서출판 신경심리.

7.

박유정, 박병관, 이현수, 염태호 (1997). 사병(Malingering) 집단의 벤튼신경심리검사 수행패턴. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 16, 405- 422.

8.

Curtis, K. L., Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., & Brennan, A. (2006). California Verbal Learning Test indicators of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: sensitivity and specificity in traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 13, 46-61.

9.

Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test(2nd ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation.

10.

Demakis, G. J. (2004). Application of clinically- derived malingering cutoffs on the California Verbal Learning Test and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Test-Revised to an analog malingering study. Applied Neuropsychology, 11, 220-226.

11.

Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., Love, J. M., Brennan, A., & Heinly, M. T. (2006). Sensitivity and specificity of MMPI-2 validity scales and indicators to malingered neurocognitive dysfunction in traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 291-512.

12.

Greve, K. W., Curtis, K. L., Bianchini, K. J., & Ord, J. S. (2009). Are the original and second edition of the California Verbal Learning Test equally accurate in detecting malingering? Assessment, 237-248.

13.

Heinly, M. T., Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., Love, J. M., & Brennan, A. (2005). WAIS digit span-based indicators of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: classification accuracy in traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 12, 429-444.

14.

Holmes, W. C. (1998). A short, psychiatric, case-finding measure for HIV seropositive outpatients: Performance characteristics of the 5-item mental health subscale of the SF-20 in a male, seropositive sample. Medical Care, 36, 237-243.

15.

Iverson, G. L., & Binder, L. M. (2000). Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15, 829-858.

16.

Larrabee, G. J. (2003). Detection of symptom exaggeration with the MMPI-2 in litigants with malingered neurocognitive dysfunction. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 54-68.

17.

Lu, P. H., Boone, K. B., Cozolino, L., & Mitchell, C. (2003). Effectiveness of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test and the Meyers and Meyers recognition trial in the detection of suspect effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 426-440.

18.

Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee of the Head Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (1993). Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 86-87.

19.

Millis, S. R., Putnam, S. H., Adams, K. M., & Ricker, J. J. (1995). The California Verbal Learning Test in the detection of incomplete effort in neuropsychological evaluation. Psychological Assessment, 7, 463-471.

20.

Millis, S. R., & Volinsky, C. T. (2001). Assessment of response bias in mild head injury: beyond malingering tests. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 809-828.

21.

Mittenberg, W., Theroux-Fichera, S., Zielinski, R. E., & Heilbronner, R. L. (1995). Identification of malingered head injury on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 491-498.

22.

Ponsford, J., Willmot, C., Rothwell, A., Cameron, P., Kelly, A., Nelms, R., Curran, C., & Ng, K. (2000). Factors influencing outcome following mild traumatic brain injury in adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 568-570.

23.

Rabin, L. A., Barr, W. B., & Burton, L. A. (2005). Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 33-65.

24.

Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingering neurocognitive dysfunction: proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 545-561.

25.

Sweet, J. J., Wolfe, P., Sattlberger, E., Numan, B., Rosenfeld, J. P., Clingerman, S., & Nies, K. J. (2000). Further investigation of traumatic brain injury versus insufficient effort with the California Verbal Learning Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 105-113.

26.

Trueblood, W. (1994). Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of malingered and other invalid WAIS-R and clinical memory data. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 597-607.

27.

Wolfe, P. L., Millis, S. R., Hanks, R., Fichtenberg, N., Larrabee, G. J., & Sweet, J. J. (2010). Effort indicators within the California Verbal Learning Test-Ⅱ. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24, 153-168.

logo