바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Differences in Source Monitoring Task Performance based on Levels of Negative Automatic Thoughts

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the schema bias effect on a source monitoring task of negative self-descriptions. Our second purpose was to explore the relationship between source monitoring performance and depression-related variables. A total of 73 university students with higher and lower levels (±1SD) of negative automatic thoughts (ATQ-N) were included. In the first phase, participants were presented the statement that a man always speaks the truth and a woman always speaks falsely. In the second phase, statements intermixed with new self-descriptions were presented on the computer screen, and the participants were to classify each as “new,” “true,” or “false.” The results of this study can be summarized as follows: the group with higher ATQ-N tended to choose the “true” response more often, and had a higher accuracy rate for the “true” items than did the group with lower ATQ-N. Second, the rate of “false” responses was negatively correlated with rumination, while the accuracy rate for “false” items was negatively correlated with belief in automatic negative thoughts (ATQ-NB) in the higher group. The present findings suggest that the automatic processing of source information about maladaptive schema plays an important role in depression-related cognition. Finally, the limitations of this study were discussed along with suggestions for further research.

keywords
automatic thought, depression, schema bias, source monitoring, 자동적 사고, 우울, 도식 편향, 출처감찰

Reference

1.

Ahn, C. K., & Chae, J. H. (1997). Standardization of the Korean Version of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. [Standardization of the Korean Version of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory]. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 9, 443-472.

2.

Batchelder, W. H., Hu, X., & Riefer, D. M. (1994). Analysis of a model for source monitoring: Contributions to Mathematical Psychology, Psychometrics, and Methodology. In G. H. Fischer & D. Laming (Ed.) Contributions to Mathematical Psychology, Psychometrics, and Methodology (pp. 51-65). New York: Springer-Verlag.

3.

Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548.

4.

Bayen, U. J., & Kuhlmann, B. G. (2011). Influences of source-item contingency and schematic knowledge on source monitoring tests of the probability-matching account. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(1), 1-17.

5.

Bayen, U. J., Nakamura, G. V., Dupuis, S. E., & Yang, C. L. (2000). The use of schematic knowledge about sources in source monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 28, 480-500.

6.

Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings (pp. 1-45). Technical report C-1, the center for research in psychophysiology. Gainesville: University of Florida.

7.

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:

8.

Choi, A. Y., Hwang, S. T., Kim, J. H., Park, K. B., Choi, J. Y., & Hong, S. H. (2014). Validity of the K-WAIS-IV Short Forms. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 413-428.

9.

Chon, K. K., Choi, S. C., & Yang, B., C. (2001). Integrated Adaptation of CES - D in Korea. Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 59-76.

10.

Christianson, S. Å., & Loftus, E. F. (1991). Remembering emotional events: The fate of detailed information. Cognition & Emotion, 5, 81-108.

11.

Cook, G. I., Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2007). Source monitoring is not always enhanced for valenced material. Memory & Cognition, 35, 222-230.

12.

Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2003). Halo and devil effects demonstrate valenced-based influences on source-monitoring decisions. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 257-278.

13.

D’argembeau, A. D., Comblain, C., & Linden, M. (2005). Affective valence and the self‐reference effect: Influence of retrieval conditions. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 457-466.

14.

D’argembeau, A. D., & Van der Linden, M. (2008). Remembering pride and shame: Self-enhancement and the phenomenology of autobiographical memory. Memory, 16, 538-547.

15.

Degl’Innocenti, A., & Bäckman, L. (1999). Source memory in major depression. Journal of Affective Disorder, 54(1), 205-209.

16.

Denny, E. B., & Hunt, R. R. (1992). Affective valence and memory in depression: Dissociation of recall and fragment completion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 575.

17.

Dobbins, I. G., & Han, S. (2006). Cue-versus probe-dependent prefrontal cortex activity during contextual remembering. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1439-1452.

18.

Dobson, K. S. (Ed.). (2009). Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies. New York: Guilford Press.

19.

Doerksen, S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2001). Source memory enhancement for emotional words. Emotion, 1, 5.

20.

Durbin, K. A., Mitchell, K. J., & Johnson, M. K. (2017). Source memory that encoding was self-referential: The influence of stimulus characteristics. Memory, 25:1191-1200.

21.

Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. (1972). A theory of objective selfconsciousness. New York: Academic.

22.

El Haj, M., & Allain, P. (2012). What do we know about the relationship between source monitoring deficits and executive dysfunction? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22, 449-472.

23.

Fossati, P., Hevenor, S. J., Lepage, M., Graham, S. J., Grady, C., Keightley, M. L., & Mayberg, H. (2004). Distributed self in episodic memory: neural correlates of successful retrieval of selfencoded positive and negative personality traits. Neuroimage, 22, 1596-1604.

24.

Gotlib, I. H., Kasch, K. L., Traill, S., Joormann, J., Arnow, B. A., & Johnson, S. L. (2004). Coherence and specificity of informationprocessing biases in depression and social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 386.

25.

Gutchess, A. H., Kensinger, E. A., Yoon, C., & Schacter, D. L. (2007). Ageing and the self-reference effect in memory. Memory, 15, 822-837.

26.

Hayes, S. C. (2005). Get out of your mind and into your life: The new acceptance and commitment therapy. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.

27.

Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Grant, D. A., & Berg, E. A. (1993). Wisconsin card sorting test: Manual, revised and expanded. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources (PAR).

28.

Hess, T. M., Popham, L. E., Dennis, P. A., & Emery, L. (2013). Information content moderates positivity and negativity biases in memory. Psychology and Aging, 28, 853.

29.

Hicks, J. L., & Cockman, D. W. (2003). The effect of general knowledge on source memory and decision processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(3), 489-501.

30.

Higgans, E. T. (1999). When do self-discrepancies have specific relations to emotions? The second-generation question of Tangney, Niedenthal, Covert, and Barlow (1998). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1313-1317.

31.

Hollon, S. D., & Kendall, P. C. (1980). Cognitive self-statements in depression: Development of an automatic thoughts questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4, 383-395.

32.

Hwang, S. T., Kim, J. H., Park, K. B., Choi, J. Y., & Hong, S. H. (2012). Standardization of the K-WAIS-IV. Korean Journal of Psychology, 1, 140-140.

33.

Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & McElree, B. D. (1999). The role of cognitive control: Early selection versus late correction. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Ed.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 383-400). New York: Guilford Press.

34.

Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 24, 403-416.

35.

Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3.

36.

Kahan, T. L., & Johnson, M. K. (1992). Self effects in memory for person information. Social Cognition, 10, 30-50.

37.

Keenan, J. M., Golding, J. M., & Brown, P. (1992). Factors controlling the advantage of self-reference over other-reference. Social Cognition, 10, 79-94.

38.

Kim, K., & Johnson, M. K. (2010). Extended self: Medial prefrontal activity during transient association of self and objects. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 199-207.

39.

Kim, S. J., Kim, J. H., & Youn, S. C. (2010). Validation of the Korean-Ruminative Response Scale (K-RRS). Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 1-19.

40.

Klein, S. B. (2012). Self, memory, and the self-reference effect: An examination of conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 283-300.

41.

Klein, S. B., & Loftus, J. (1988). The nature of self-referent encoding:The contributions of elaborative and organizational processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 5.

42.

Klein, S. B., & Nelson, C. R. (2014). The effects of self-reference on memory: A conceptual and methodological review of inferences warranted by the self-reference effect. (Ed. T. J. Perfect & D. S. Lindsay). The Sage Handbook of Applied Memory. (Ch. 15)Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

43.

Kwon, S. M., & Yoon, H. K. (1994). The development study of Korean Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire. Student Rearch, 12, 10-25.

44.

Lee, J. D., & Lee, H. J. (2017). An overview of source monitoring:Concept, assessment, and schema bias. Korean Journal of Psychology:General, 36, 397-420.

45.

Leshikar, E. D., & Duarte, A. (2012). Medial prefrontal cortex supports source memory accuracy for self-referenced items. Social Neuroscience, 7, 126-145.

46.

Leshikar, E. D., & Duarte, A. (2014). Medial prefrontal cortex supports source memory for self-referenced materials in young and older adults. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 236-252.

47.

Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection theory: A user's guide. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Elbaum.

48.

Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., & Hicks, J. L. (2006). Gender and orientation stereotypes bias sourcemonitoring attributions. Memory, 14, 148-160.

49.

Mather, M. (2006). Why memories may become more positive as people age. In B. Uttl, N. Ohta, & A. L. Siegenthaler (Eds.), Memory and emotion: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 135-158). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

50.

Mather, M. (2007). Emotional arousal and memory binding: An object-based framework. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 33-52.

51.

Mather, M., Mitchell, K. J., Raye, C. L., Novak, D. L., Greene, E. J., & Johnson, M. K. (2006). Emotional arousal can impair feature binding in working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 614-625.

52.

Moon, H. M. (2006). Development and validation of the program for facilitation of psychological acceptance based on acceptance &commitment therapy model. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), The Catholic University of Seoul, Korea.

53.

Nolde, S. F., Johnson, M. K., & D’esposito, M. (1998). Left prefrontal activation during episodic remembering: An event‐related fMRI study. NeuroReport, 9, 3509-3514.

54.

Nolen-Hoeksema., S. (1991). Response styles questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript.

55.

Pauly, K., Finkelmeyer, A., Schneider, F., & Habel, U. (2012). The neural correlates of positive self-evaluation and self-related memory. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 878-886.

56.

Pyczsinski, T., & Greenberg, J. (1987). Self-regulatory perseveration and thedepressive self-focusing style: A self-awareness theory of depression. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 122-138.

57.

Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.

58.

Reisberg, D., & Heuer, F. (2004). Memory for emotional events. En D. Reisberg, & P. Hertel (Eds.), Memory and emotion (pp. 3-40):Oxford: Oxford University Press.

59.

Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2005). A comparison of attentional biases and memory biases in women with social phobia and major depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 62.

60.

Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677.

61.

Rybash, J. M., & Colilla, J. L. (1994). Source memory deficits and frontal lobe functioning in children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 10, 67-73.

62.

Sedikides, C., & Green, J. D. (2000). On the self-protective nature of inconsistency-negativity management: Using the person memory paradigm to examine self-referent memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 906.

63.

Serbun, S. J., Shih, J. Y., & Gutchess, A. H. (2011). Memory for details with self-referencing. Memory, 19, 1004-1014.

64.

Siedlecki, K. L., Salthouse, T. A., & Berish, D. E. (2005). Is there anything special about the aging of source memory? Psychology and Aging, 20, 19.

65.

Spaniol, J., & Bayen, U. J. (2002). When is schematic knowledge used in source monitoring? Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 28, 631-651.

66.

Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 121, 371.

67.

Teasdale, J. D. (1985). Psychological treatments for depression:How do they work? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 157-165.

68.

Victor, T. A., Furey, M. L., Fromm, S. J., Öhman, A., & Drevets, W. C. (2010). Relationship between amygdala responses to masked faces and mood state and treatment in major depressive disorder. Archives of general psychiatry, 67, 1128-1138.

69.

Williams, J. M. G., Ellis, N. C., Tyers, C., Healy, H., Rose, G., & Macleod, A. K. (1996). The specificity of autobiographical memory and imageability of the future. Memory & Cognition, 24, 116-125.

70.

Yang, J. W., Hong, S. D., Jung, Y. S., & Kim, J. H. (2005). The validation study of Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ-N) and the Positive Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ-P) in adolescents. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 631-646.

71.

Yang, L., Truong, L., Fuss, S., & Bislimovic, S. (2012). The effects of ageing and divided attention on the self-reference effect in emotional memory: Spontaneous or effortful mnemonic benefits? Memory, 20, 596-607.

72.

Yoshimura, S., Ueda, K., Suzuki, S. I., Onoda, K., Okamoto, Y., & Yamawaki, S. (2009). Self-referential processing of negative stimuli within the ventral anterior cingulate gyrus and right amygdala. Brain and Cognition, 69, 218-225.

73.

Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy:A practitioner's guide: New York: Guilford Press.

logo