바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Survey of Actual Condition on Improvement and Point at Issue of Currently Book Numbers in Korean University Libraries

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2004, v.21 no.4, pp.233-249
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2004.21.4.233

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Book numbers can be defined as the device for providing a unique self location for each book. They should include main entry which consists of author, title, the date of publication. Now, the university libraries are using eleven different methods on book numbers, in other words, nine eastern methods and two western methods. The aim of this study is to investigate problems that the present book number system has and some concerns that should be taken into account in case of the modification of the book number system and change into a new one. This study is based on the survey in that the librarian gave to 110 university libraries throughout the nation. As a result, the survey indicates that the crucial concerns of the participathing libraries are ineffective book management and the duplication of book numbers. In addition, the survey indicates that the priorities of the libraries is removing duplicated numbers, adhering to the current system, and keeping the same book arrangement system. Therefore, this study suggests the components for the expansion of the book number system and the necessity of standardization of diverse book numbers.

keywords
도서기호법, 대학도서관, 도서기호체계, 실태조사Book Numbers, University Library, Book Number System, Survey of Actual conditaion

Reference

1.

金南碩. (1988). ꡔ圖書記號:명대학교 출판부.

2.

김성원. (1997). 새 연대순 도서기호법에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회, 31(2), 79-93.

3.

김치우. (1987). 資料組織의 效率性 考察: 特히 圖書記號를 中心으로:부산여대.

4.

리재철. (1970). 구조론에 입각한 한국 저자기호표의 연구; 한글의 구조상의 특색, 기입의 형식, 배열, 표기법 문제 등과 관련한 고찰. 圖書館學, 1, 1-57.

5.

리재철. (1971). 저자기호법에 있어서 한글의 기호 삼기 문제에 대하여. 人文科學, 24, 221-245.

6.

리재철. (1972). 한글, 숫자 기호법의 도서기호로서의 문제점: 張一世氏의 논박에 대한 반박. 人文科學, 27, 183-212.

7.

리재철. (1985). 새 연대순 도서기호법의 연구. 圖書館學, 12, 7-37.

8.

박준식. (1991). 英美 著者記號法 硏究.

9.

李丙洙. (1968). 圖書記號의 여러 가지 방법(I). 국회도서관보, 5(10), 13-28.

10.

李丙洙. (1969). 圖書記號의 여러 가지 방법 (2). 국회도서관보, 6(1), 19-28.

11.

이양숙. (1995). 우리나라 도서관에서 사용하고 있는 도서기호법에 관한 실태조사. 한국문헌정보학회, 28(29), 23-70.

12.

장일세. (1971). 우리 나라에 있어서 저자기호표에 관한 연구. 圖書館學, 2, 1-45.

13.

정필모. (1972). 韓國文獻記號法 硏究; 現行 列擧式 著者記號法에 대한 代案. 국회도서관보, 9(5), 5-62.

14.

ALA. A Survey of Libraries of United States:ALA.

15.

Barden, Bertha R. (1937). Book Numbers: a Manual for Students with a Basic Code of Rules:ALA.

16.

Bliss, Henry Evelyn. (1910). Simplified Book -Notation. Library Journal, 35, 455-564.

17.

Comaromi, John P. (2003). Book numbers: a historical study and practical guide to their use. Littleton: Libraries Unlimited. Denton.

18.

Lehnus, Donald J. (1980). Book unmbers: history, principles, and application:American Library Association.

19.

Mann. (1943). Margaret. Introduction to Cataloging and Classification of Books, 2nd ed:ALA.

20.

Ranganathan, S. R. (1957). Prolegomena to Library Classification, 2nd ed:Library Association.

21.

Ranganathan, S. R. (1964). Colon Classification. 6th ed:Asia Pub. Hous.

22.

Satija, Mohinder partap. (1992). Beyond Classisfication: book numbers with special reference to chronological book number:Ess.

23.

Young, Heartsill. (1983). ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science:ALA.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management