바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

A Study on Factors which affect Immediacy Indexes for Biology Journals

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management / Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, (P)1013-0799; (E)2586-2073
2009, v.26 no.4, pp.169-186
https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.4.169

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This paper examined what factors affect the immediacy index showing the average number of times an article is cited in the year it is published. Not only Seventy-one immediacy indexes for subject field biology on JCR 2008 edition were gathered, but also many characteristics of scholarly journals that may influence the indexes directly or indirectly were aggregated. Simple correlation coefficient analysis, factor analysis, and regression analysis were performed on the paper. Therefore factors such as physical volume, availability, forthcoming issue, age and language explaining 67.64% of total variance were identified. After regression analysis using these factors as independent variables, the results were statistically significant. The results showed physical volumes, the total pages of publication, have an influence upon immediacy indexes obviously, although it is expected that journal reputations may affect immediacy indexes. Generally open access journals had high immediacy indexes. High ranked journals on immediacy index were apt to be issued frequently, uploaded very often on PMC, and published in major countries including United States and United Kingdom.

keywords
journal, immediacy index, factor, physical volume, availability, open access, biology, 학술지, 즉시성지수, 요인, 외형, 수집가능성, 오픈액세스, 생물학, journal, immediacy index, factor, physical volume, availability, open access, biology

Reference

1.

유완석. (2001). 국내 기계관련 저널의 KSCI(Korean Science Citation Index) 분석 (259-264). 대한기계학회 2001년도 춘계학술대회논문집 B.

2.

장환석. (2006). 기계공학분야 연구자의 문헌인용 행태 연구.

3.

허만형. (2002). 통계분석론:법문사.

4.

Brody, T. (2007). The effect of open access on citation impact. http://www.iam.ecs.soton.ac.uk.

5.

Craig, Iain D. (2007). Do open access articles have greater citation impact?. Journal of Informatrics, 1(3), 239-248.

6.

Hitchcock, S. (2007). The effect of open access and downloads(‘hits') on citation impact: a bibliography of studies. http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html.

7.

Ingwersen, P. (2006). Webometrics: ten years of expansion. http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00006263/01/ingwersen.pdf.

8.

Kousha, K. (2006). Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: a multi-discipline exploratory analysis. http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00006416/01/google.pdf.

9.

Leydesdorff, Loet. (2009). How are new citationbased journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1327-1336.

10.

Maharana, B. (2006). Scholarly use of web resources in LIS research: a citation analysis. Library Review, 55(9), 598-607.

11.

McVeigh, Marie E. (2004a). Open Access jour nals in the ISI citation databases: Ana lysis of Impact Factors and Citation Pat terns. http://scientific.thomson.com …, 2005-scientific.thomsonreuters.com.

12.

McVeigh, Marie E. (2004b). Beyond Impact Factors: understanding the data in the Journal Citation Reports. The Physiologist, 47(6), 458-460.

13.

McVeigh, Marie E. (2005). Open access to the medical literature: How much content is available in published journals?. Serials, 18(1), 45-50.

14.

Metcalfe, Travis S. (2005). The rise and citation impact of astro-ph in major journals. http://arXiv.org/archive/astro-ph.

15.

Metcalfe, Travis S. (2008). The citation impact of digital preprint archives for solar physics papers. http://arXiv.org/archive/astro-ph.

16.

Mukherjee, Bhaskar. (2009). Do open-access journals in library and information Science have any scholarly impact? A Bibliometric study of selected openaccess journals using Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 581-594.

17.

Narin, F. Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity.

18.

Satyanarayana, K. (1999). The Relevance of short communication in scholarly journals: an Empirical study. Scientometrics, 44(1), 47-58.

19.

Schwarz, Greg. (2004). Demographic and citation trends in astrophysical journal papers and preprints. http://arXiv.org/archive/astro-ph.

20.

Tenopir, C. (2009). Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patters. Aslib Proceedings, 61(1), 5-32.

21.

Tomer, Christinger. (1986). A Statistical assessment of two measures of citation: The Impact Factor and the Immediacy Index. Information Processing & Management, 22(2), 251-258.

22.

Tonta, Y., Y. Ünal. (2007). The citation impact of open access journals articles. http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00009619.

23.

Turk, N. (2008). Citation impact of open access journals. New Library World, 109(1), 65-74.

24.

Vaughan, L. (2005). Web citation data for impact assessment: a comparison of four science discipline. Journal of the American Society for Inforamtion Science and Technology, 56(10), 1075-1087.

25.

Weiping, Y. (2004). The Immediacy Index and the journal Impact Factor: Two highly correlated derived measures. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 28(1), 33-48.

26.

JCR(Journal Citation Reports). JCR(Journal Citation Reports). http://admin-apps.isiknowledge.com/JCR/.

27.

NDSL(National Digital Science Links). NDSL(National Digital Science Links). http://scholar.ndsl.kr/index.do.

28.

PMC(PubMed Central). PMC(PubMed Central). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/.

29.

Ulrich's Periodicals Directory. Ulrich's Periodicals Directory. http://www.ulrichsweb.com/ulrichsweb/.

Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management